Re: [RFC 0/4] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

2017-07-18 Thread Arun Kalyanasundaram
Thank you for taking a look into it. I don't see the garbled output.
Can you please send me the  perf.data file or a way to reproduce it?

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Jiri Olsa  wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:10:36PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote:
>> The process_event python hook receives a dict with all perf_sample entries.
>>
>> Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate the 
>> introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series adds the 
>> dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to them.
>>
>> This change adds an additional argument to the affected handlers. To keep 
>> backwards compatibility (and avoid unnecessary work), do not pass the 
>> aforementioned dict if the number of arguments signals that handler version 
>> predates this change.
>>
>> Initial Discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/1/108
>>
>> Arun Kalyanasundaram (4):
>>   perf script python: Allocate memory only if handler exists
>>   perf script python: Refactor creation of perf sample dict
>>   perf script python: Add perf_sample dict to tracepoint handlers
>>   perf script python: Generate hooks with additional argument
>>
>>  .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c| 189 
>> ++---
>>  1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> looks good, but any idea the perf-script.py output gives
> some trash at the end of 'comm' args? like:
>
> sched__sched_stat_runtime 1 199971.01018286921999 perf
>   comm=perf^@^@-x86_64-l^@, pid=21999
>
>
> thanks,
> jirka


Re: [RFC 0/4] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

2017-07-18 Thread Arun Kalyanasundaram
Thank you for taking a look into it. I don't see the garbled output.
Can you please send me the  perf.data file or a way to reproduce it?

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Jiri Olsa  wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:10:36PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote:
>> The process_event python hook receives a dict with all perf_sample entries.
>>
>> Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate the 
>> introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series adds the 
>> dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to them.
>>
>> This change adds an additional argument to the affected handlers. To keep 
>> backwards compatibility (and avoid unnecessary work), do not pass the 
>> aforementioned dict if the number of arguments signals that handler version 
>> predates this change.
>>
>> Initial Discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/1/108
>>
>> Arun Kalyanasundaram (4):
>>   perf script python: Allocate memory only if handler exists
>>   perf script python: Refactor creation of perf sample dict
>>   perf script python: Add perf_sample dict to tracepoint handlers
>>   perf script python: Generate hooks with additional argument
>>
>>  .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c| 189 
>> ++---
>>  1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> looks good, but any idea the perf-script.py output gives
> some trash at the end of 'comm' args? like:
>
> sched__sched_stat_runtime 1 199971.01018286921999 perf
>   comm=perf^@^@-x86_64-l^@, pid=21999
>
>
> thanks,
> jirka


Re: [RFC 0/4] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

2017-07-18 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:10:36PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote:
> The process_event python hook receives a dict with all perf_sample entries.
> 
> Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate the 
> introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series adds the 
> dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to them.
> 
> This change adds an additional argument to the affected handlers. To keep 
> backwards compatibility (and avoid unnecessary work), do not pass the 
> aforementioned dict if the number of arguments signals that handler version 
> predates this change.
> 
> Initial Discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/1/108
> 
> Arun Kalyanasundaram (4):
>   perf script python: Allocate memory only if handler exists
>   perf script python: Refactor creation of perf sample dict
>   perf script python: Add perf_sample dict to tracepoint handlers
>   perf script python: Generate hooks with additional argument
> 
>  .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c| 189 
> ++---
>  1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

looks good, but any idea the perf-script.py output gives
some trash at the end of 'comm' args? like:

sched__sched_stat_runtime 1 199971.01018286921999 perf  
comm=perf^@^@-x86_64-l^@, pid=21999


thanks,
jirka


Re: [RFC 0/4] perf script python: Provide perf_sample dict to all handlers

2017-07-18 Thread Jiri Olsa
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:10:36PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram wrote:
> The process_event python hook receives a dict with all perf_sample entries.
> 
> Other handlers (e.g. trace_unhandled, python_process_tracepoint) predate the 
> introduction of this dict and do not receive it. This patch series adds the 
> dict to all handlers, aiming to unify the information passed to them.
> 
> This change adds an additional argument to the affected handlers. To keep 
> backwards compatibility (and avoid unnecessary work), do not pass the 
> aforementioned dict if the number of arguments signals that handler version 
> predates this change.
> 
> Initial Discussion: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/1/108
> 
> Arun Kalyanasundaram (4):
>   perf script python: Allocate memory only if handler exists
>   perf script python: Refactor creation of perf sample dict
>   perf script python: Add perf_sample dict to tracepoint handlers
>   perf script python: Generate hooks with additional argument
> 
>  .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c| 189 
> ++---
>  1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

looks good, but any idea the perf-script.py output gives
some trash at the end of 'comm' args? like:

sched__sched_stat_runtime 1 199971.01018286921999 perf  
comm=perf^@^@-x86_64-l^@, pid=21999


thanks,
jirka