Re: [RFC 06/10] thermal: samsung: Remove support for Exynos5440

2018-04-26 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:41 AM, Chanwoo Choi  wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 2018년 04월 25일 05:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The Exynos5440 is not actively developed, there are no development
>> boards available and probably there are no real products with it.
>> Remove wide-tree support for Exynos5440.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt |  14 +-
>>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c   | 155 
>> +
>>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h   |   1 -
>>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
>
>
> After applied this patch, I tested the build and found out
> 'exynos5440' keyword. There is one comment including 'exynos5440' as 
> following:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c 
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index f92f470bce21..cb525228cfe1 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct 
> exynos_tmu_data *data)
>  * Exynos3250, Exynos4412, Exynos5250 and Exynos5260 incorrectly
>  * states that INTCLEAR register has a different placing of bits
>  * responsible for FALL IRQs than INTSTAT register.  Exynos5420
> -* and Exynos5440 documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
> +* documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
>  * support FALL IRQs at all).
>  */
> writel(val_irq, data->base + tmu_intclear);
>
> After removing it, looks good to me.
> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi 

Thanks, I left this comment intentionally as it has some meaning even
when Exynos5440 is not supported.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Re: [RFC 06/10] thermal: samsung: Remove support for Exynos5440

2018-04-25 Thread Chanwoo Choi
Hi Krzysztof,

On 2018년 04월 25일 05:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Exynos5440 is not actively developed, there are no development
> boards available and probably there are no real products with it.
> Remove wide-tree support for Exynos5440.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt |  14 +-
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c   | 155 
> +
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h   |   1 -
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)


After applied this patch, I tested the build and found out
'exynos5440' keyword. There is one comment including 'exynos5440' as following:

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c 
b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index f92f470bce21..cb525228cfe1 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct 
exynos_tmu_data *data)
 * Exynos3250, Exynos4412, Exynos5250 and Exynos5260 incorrectly
 * states that INTCLEAR register has a different placing of bits
 * responsible for FALL IRQs than INTSTAT register.  Exynos5420
-* and Exynos5440 documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
+* documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
 * support FALL IRQs at all).
 */
writel(val_irq, data->base + tmu_intclear);

After removing it, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi 

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics


Re: [RFC 06/10] thermal: samsung: Remove support for Exynos5440

2018-04-25 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 10:32:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Exynos5440 is not actively developed, there are no development
> boards available and probably there are no real products with it.
> Remove wide-tree support for Exynos5440.

Thanks for doing this.

> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 

Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics