Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: selftests: Guard struct kvm_vcpu_events with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
On 20.05.19 10:08, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 20/05/2019 09.12, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> On 16.05.19 13:12, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> The struct kvm_vcpu_events code is only available on certain architectures >>> (arm, arm64 and x86). To be able to compile kvm_util.c also for other >>> architectures, we've got to fence the code with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth >> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger >> >> According to the MAINTAINERS patches, you want me to pick these patches. >> Correct? > > That would be nice, yes. But if you don't want to be responsible for > s390x-related KVM selftest patches, please let me know, then I'll drop > these hunks from the patches again. I can take care of these (as part of the normal KVM maintainership).
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: selftests: Guard struct kvm_vcpu_events with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
On 20/05/2019 09.12, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 16.05.19 13:12, Thomas Huth wrote: >> The struct kvm_vcpu_events code is only available on certain architectures >> (arm, arm64 and x86). To be able to compile kvm_util.c also for other >> architectures, we've got to fence the code with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger > > According to the MAINTAINERS patches, you want me to pick these patches. > Correct? That would be nice, yes. But if you don't want to be responsible for s390x-related KVM selftest patches, please let me know, then I'll drop these hunks from the patches again. Thomas
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: selftests: Guard struct kvm_vcpu_events with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
On 16.05.19 13:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The struct kvm_vcpu_events code is only available on certain architectures
> (arm, arm64 and x86). To be able to compile kvm_util.c also for other
> architectures, we've got to fence the code with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger
According to the MAINTAINERS patches, you want me to pick these patches.
Correct?
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 2 ++
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> index 07b71ad9734a..1e46ab205038 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> @@ -114,10 +114,12 @@ void vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> struct kvm_sregs *sregs);
> int _vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> struct kvm_sregs *sregs);
> +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
> void vcpu_events_get(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
> void vcpu_events_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
> +#endif
>
> const char *exit_reason_str(unsigned int exit_reason);
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> index 4ca96b228e46..8d63ccb93e10 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> @@ -1224,6 +1224,7 @@ void vcpu_regs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> struct kvm_regs *regs)
> ret, errno);
> }
>
> +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
> void vcpu_events_get(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
> {
> @@ -1249,6 +1250,7 @@ void vcpu_events_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, failed, rc: %i errno: %i",
> ret, errno);
> }
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * VM VCPU System Regs Get
>
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] KVM: selftests: Guard struct kvm_vcpu_events with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
On 16.05.19 13:12, Thomas Huth wrote:
> The struct kvm_vcpu_events code is only available on certain architectures
> (arm, arm64 and x86). To be able to compile kvm_util.c also for other
> architectures, we've got to fence the code with __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 2 ++
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> index 07b71ad9734a..1e46ab205038 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
> @@ -114,10 +114,12 @@ void vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> struct kvm_sregs *sregs);
> int _vcpu_sregs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> struct kvm_sregs *sregs);
> +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
> void vcpu_events_get(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
> void vcpu_events_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>struct kvm_vcpu_events *events);
> +#endif
>
> const char *exit_reason_str(unsigned int exit_reason);
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> index 4ca96b228e46..8d63ccb93e10 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> @@ -1224,6 +1224,7 @@ void vcpu_regs_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> struct kvm_regs *regs)
> ret, errno);
> }
>
> +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
> void vcpu_events_get(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
>struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
> {
> @@ -1249,6 +1250,7 @@ void vcpu_events_set(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid,
> TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS, failed, rc: %i errno: %i",
> ret, errno);
> }
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * VM VCPU System Regs Get
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
