Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Arnd Hannemann wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Arnd Hannemann wrote: >>> This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: >>> I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output >>> of the guest. >>> >> I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only >> gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it a while ago, >> but I don't know that its had any real attention since. I've been >> making sure non-PAE compiles, but I've been lax about testing it. >> This is the first usermode exec, I guess? The backtrace is a bit odd; >> I've never seen a problem in move_page_tables before. > > Yes its trying to execute the first script in initramfs, I also tried with > initramdisk > and got a similar error. (move_page_tables also involved) > >> Does "xm dmesg" tell you what Xen is complaining about? You may need to >> compile with debug=y in Config.mk. > > (XEN) mm.c:645:d44 Non-privileged (44) attempt to map I/O space > > I will recompile with debug=y and post the output. I recompiled with debug=y but no more information than above message... [snip] Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Arnd Hannemann wrote: Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Arnd Hannemann wrote: This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the guest. I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it a while ago, but I don't know that its had any real attention since. I've been making sure non-PAE compiles, but I've been lax about testing it. This is the first usermode exec, I guess? The backtrace is a bit odd; I've never seen a problem in move_page_tables before. Yes its trying to execute the first script in initramfs, I also tried with initramdisk and got a similar error. (move_page_tables also involved) Does xm dmesg tell you what Xen is complaining about? You may need to compile with debug=y in Config.mk. (XEN) mm.c:645:d44 Non-privileged (44) attempt to map I/O space I will recompile with debug=y and post the output. I recompiled with debug=y but no more information than above message... [snip] Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Arnd Hannemann wrote: Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Arnd Hannemann wrote: This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the guest. I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it a while ago, but I don't know that its had any real attention since. I've been making sure non-PAE compiles, but I've been lax about testing it. This is the first usermode exec, I guess? The backtrace is a bit odd; I've never seen a problem in move_page_tables before. Yes its trying to execute the first script in initramfs, I also tried with initramdisk and got a similar error. (move_page_tables also involved) Does "xm dmesg" tell you what Xen is complaining about? You may need to compile with debug=y in Config.mk. (XEN) mm.c:645:d44 Non-privileged (44) attempt to map I/O space I will recompile with debug=y and post the output. If I reduce the dom0 memory with dom0_mem=20 I see something like 0080 with dom0_mem=80 I always see . That's helpful. Looks like the mfn is getting mushed to 0. J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Arnd Hannemann wrote: >> This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: >> I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output >> of the guest. >> > > I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only > gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it a while ago, > but I don't know that its had any real attention since. I've been > making sure non-PAE compiles, but I've been lax about testing it. > This is the first usermode exec, I guess? The backtrace is a bit odd; > I've never seen a problem in move_page_tables before. Yes its trying to execute the first script in initramfs, I also tried with initramdisk and got a similar error. (move_page_tables also involved) > > Does "xm dmesg" tell you what Xen is complaining about? You may need to > compile with debug=y in Config.mk. (XEN) mm.c:645:d44 Non-privileged (44) attempt to map I/O space I will recompile with debug=y and post the output. If I reduce the dom0 memory with dom0_mem=20 I see something like 0080 with dom0_mem=80 I always see . > >> [0.599806] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0 >> [0.599816] call 1/2: op=26 arg=[c1051860] result=0 >> [0.599825] call 2/2: op=14 arg=[bf9c7000] result=-22 >> [0.599841] [ cut here ] >> [0.599851] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:103! >> [0.599861] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP >> [0.599871] Modules linked in: >> [0.599879] >> [0.599885] Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted (2.6.24.2 #6) >> [0.599895] EIP: 0061:[] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 >> [0.599910] EIP is at xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 >> [0.599919] EAX: EBX: c10510a0 ECX: c1051060 EDX: c1051060 >> [0.599930] ESI: 0002 EDI: 0001 EBP: c2417c10 ESP: c2417be4 >> [0.599940] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: SS: e021 >> [0.599951] Process init (pid: 1, ti=c2417000 task=c2416ab0 >> task.ti=c2417000) >> [0.599960] Stack: c0443c98 0002 0002 000e bf9c7000 >> ffea c1051060 0200 >> [0.599984]0067 c193fffc bf9c7000 c2417c18 c0101112 >> c2417c5c c0166dfc c193ce40 >> [0.66]c193e5c0 c000 c193e5c0 1000 c000 >> c193ce40 c198e71c c10331cc >> [0.600029] Call Trace: >> [0.600036] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 >> [0.600050] [] show_stack_log_lvl+0xa9/0xd0 >> [0.600062] [] show_registers+0xca/0x1e0 >> [0.600074] [] die+0x11a/0x250 >> [0.600085] [] do_trap+0x83/0xb0 >> [0.600096] [] do_invalid_op+0x88/0xa0 >> [0.600108] [] error_code+0x72/0x80 >> [0.600121] [] xen_leave_lazy+0x12/0x20 >> [0.600134] [] move_page_tables+0x27c/0x300 >> [0.600149] [] setup_arg_pages+0x162/0x2a0 >> [0.600162] [] load_elf_binary+0x3d3/0x1bd0 >> [0.600175] [] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 >> [0.600190] [] load_script+0x1bf/0x200 >> [0.600202] [] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 >> [0.600215] [] do_execve+0x15b/0x180 >> [0.600227] [] sys_execve+0x2e/0x80 >> [0.600241] [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb >> [0.600253] === >> [0.600259] Code: 24 08 89 44 24 0c 89 74 24 04 c7 04 24 98 3c 44 >> c0 e8 c9 36 02 00 8b 45 ec 83 c3 20 8b 90 00 0b 00 00 39 d6 72 c0 e9 >> 04 ff ff ff <0f> 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe 8d b6 00 00 00 00 8d bf 00 00 00 >> 00 55 >> [0.600370] EIP: [] xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 SS:ESP >> e021:c2417be4 >> [0.600393] ---[ end trace a686db401f06e173 ]--- >> [0.600403] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! >> >> full dmesg, config here: >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-02/msg00716.html >> >> Best regards, >> Arnd Hannemann >> >> > >J > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Arnd Hannemann wrote: This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the guest. I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it a while ago, but I don't know that its had any real attention since. I've been making sure non-PAE compiles, but I've been lax about testing it. This is the first usermode exec, I guess? The backtrace is a bit odd; I've never seen a problem in move_page_tables before. Does "xm dmesg" tell you what Xen is complaining about? You may need to compile with debug=y in Config.mk. [0.599806] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0 [0.599816] call 1/2: op=26 arg=[c1051860] result=0 [0.599825] call 2/2: op=14 arg=[bf9c7000] result=-22 [0.599841] [ cut here ] [0.599851] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:103! [0.599861] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP [0.599871] Modules linked in: [0.599879] [0.599885] Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted (2.6.24.2 #6) [0.599895] EIP: 0061:[] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 [0.599910] EIP is at xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 [0.599919] EAX: EBX: c10510a0 ECX: c1051060 EDX: c1051060 [0.599930] ESI: 0002 EDI: 0001 EBP: c2417c10 ESP: c2417be4 [0.599940] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: SS: e021 [0.599951] Process init (pid: 1, ti=c2417000 task=c2416ab0 task.ti=c2417000) [0.599960] Stack: c0443c98 0002 0002 000e bf9c7000 ffea c1051060 0200 [0.599984]0067 c193fffc bf9c7000 c2417c18 c0101112 c2417c5c c0166dfc c193ce40 [0.66]c193e5c0 c000 c193e5c0 1000 c000 c193ce40 c198e71c c10331cc [0.600029] Call Trace: [0.600036] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 [0.600050] [] show_stack_log_lvl+0xa9/0xd0 [0.600062] [] show_registers+0xca/0x1e0 [0.600074] [] die+0x11a/0x250 [0.600085] [] do_trap+0x83/0xb0 [0.600096] [] do_invalid_op+0x88/0xa0 [0.600108] [] error_code+0x72/0x80 [0.600121] [] xen_leave_lazy+0x12/0x20 [0.600134] [] move_page_tables+0x27c/0x300 [0.600149] [] setup_arg_pages+0x162/0x2a0 [0.600162] [] load_elf_binary+0x3d3/0x1bd0 [0.600175] [] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600190] [] load_script+0x1bf/0x200 [0.600202] [] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600215] [] do_execve+0x15b/0x180 [0.600227] [] sys_execve+0x2e/0x80 [0.600241] [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [0.600253] === [0.600259] Code: 24 08 89 44 24 0c 89 74 24 04 c7 04 24 98 3c 44 c0 e8 c9 36 02 00 8b 45 ec 83 c3 20 8b 90 00 0b 00 00 39 d6 72 c0 e9 04 ff ff ff <0f> 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe 8d b6 00 00 00 00 8d bf 00 00 00 00 55 [0.600370] EIP: [] xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 SS:ESP e021:c2417be4 [0.600393] ---[ end trace a686db401f06e173 ]--- [0.600403] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! full dmesg, config here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-02/msg00716.html Best regards, Arnd Hannemann J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Jeremy Fitzhardinge schrieb: > Arnd Hannemann wrote: >> As paravirtualized xen guests won't work with !X86_PAE, change the >> Kconfig >> accordingly. >> > > !PAE is supposed to work, but it is a rarely used configuration. How > does it fail? > >J > This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the guest. [0.599806] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0 [0.599816] call 1/2: op=26 arg=[c1051860] result=0 [0.599825] call 2/2: op=14 arg=[bf9c7000] result=-22 [0.599841] [ cut here ] [0.599851] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:103! [0.599861] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP [0.599871] Modules linked in: [0.599879] [0.599885] Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted (2.6.24.2 #6) [0.599895] EIP: 0061:[] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 [0.599910] EIP is at xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 [0.599919] EAX: EBX: c10510a0 ECX: c1051060 EDX: c1051060 [0.599930] ESI: 0002 EDI: 0001 EBP: c2417c10 ESP: c2417be4 [0.599940] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: SS: e021 [0.599951] Process init (pid: 1, ti=c2417000 task=c2416ab0 task.ti=c2417000) [0.599960] Stack: c0443c98 0002 0002 000e bf9c7000 ffea c1051060 0200 [0.599984]0067 c193fffc bf9c7000 c2417c18 c0101112 c2417c5c c0166dfc c193ce40 [0.66]c193e5c0 c000 c193e5c0 1000 c000 c193ce40 c198e71c c10331cc [0.600029] Call Trace: [0.600036] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 [0.600050] [] show_stack_log_lvl+0xa9/0xd0 [0.600062] [] show_registers+0xca/0x1e0 [0.600074] [] die+0x11a/0x250 [0.600085] [] do_trap+0x83/0xb0 [0.600096] [] do_invalid_op+0x88/0xa0 [0.600108] [] error_code+0x72/0x80 [0.600121] [] xen_leave_lazy+0x12/0x20 [0.600134] [] move_page_tables+0x27c/0x300 [0.600149] [] setup_arg_pages+0x162/0x2a0 [0.600162] [] load_elf_binary+0x3d3/0x1bd0 [0.600175] [] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600190] [] load_script+0x1bf/0x200 [0.600202] [] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600215] [] do_execve+0x15b/0x180 [0.600227] [] sys_execve+0x2e/0x80 [0.600241] [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [0.600253] === [0.600259] Code: 24 08 89 44 24 0c 89 74 24 04 c7 04 24 98 3c 44 c0 e8 c9 36 02 00 8b 45 ec 83 c3 20 8b 90 00 0b 00 00 39 d6 72 c0 e9 04 ff ff ff <0f> 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe 8d b6 00 00 00 00 8d bf 00 00 00 00 55 [0.600370] EIP: [] xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 SS:ESP e021:c2417be4 [0.600393] ---[ end trace a686db401f06e173 ]--- [0.600403] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! full dmesg, config here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-02/msg00716.html Best regards, Arnd Hannemann -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Arnd Hannemann wrote: As paravirtualized xen guests won't work with !X86_PAE, change the Kconfig accordingly. !PAE is supposed to work, but it is a rarely used configuration. How does it fail? J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Arnd Hannemann wrote: As paravirtualized xen guests won't work with !X86_PAE, change the Kconfig accordingly. !PAE is supposed to work, but it is a rarely used configuration. How does it fail? J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Jeremy Fitzhardinge schrieb: Arnd Hannemann wrote: As paravirtualized xen guests won't work with !X86_PAE, change the Kconfig accordingly. !PAE is supposed to work, but it is a rarely used configuration. How does it fail? J This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the guest. [0.599806] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0 [0.599816] call 1/2: op=26 arg=[c1051860] result=0 [0.599825] call 2/2: op=14 arg=[bf9c7000] result=-22 [0.599841] [ cut here ] [0.599851] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:103! [0.599861] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP [0.599871] Modules linked in: [0.599879] [0.599885] Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted (2.6.24.2 #6) [0.599895] EIP: 0061:[c0101b7c] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 [0.599910] EIP is at xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 [0.599919] EAX: EBX: c10510a0 ECX: c1051060 EDX: c1051060 [0.599930] ESI: 0002 EDI: 0001 EBP: c2417c10 ESP: c2417be4 [0.599940] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: SS: e021 [0.599951] Process init (pid: 1, ti=c2417000 task=c2416ab0 task.ti=c2417000) [0.599960] Stack: c0443c98 0002 0002 000e bf9c7000 ffea c1051060 0200 [0.599984]0067 c193fffc bf9c7000 c2417c18 c0101112 c2417c5c c0166dfc c193ce40 [0.66]c193e5c0 c000 c193e5c0 1000 c000 c193ce40 c198e71c c10331cc [0.600029] Call Trace: [0.600036] [c0107a6a] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 [0.600050] [c0107b29] show_stack_log_lvl+0xa9/0xd0 [0.600062] [c0107c1a] show_registers+0xca/0x1e0 [0.600074] [c0107e4a] die+0x11a/0x250 [0.600085] [c0108003] do_trap+0x83/0xb0 [0.600096] [c0108318] do_invalid_op+0x88/0xa0 [0.600108] [c03e89d2] error_code+0x72/0x80 [0.600121] [c0101112] xen_leave_lazy+0x12/0x20 [0.600134] [c0166dfc] move_page_tables+0x27c/0x300 [0.600149] [c0174762] setup_arg_pages+0x162/0x2a0 [0.600162] [c019cad3] load_elf_binary+0x3d3/0x1bd0 [0.600175] [c0173f92] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600190] [c019b1ef] load_script+0x1bf/0x200 [0.600202] [c0173f92] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600215] [c0175bab] do_execve+0x15b/0x180 [0.600227] [c0104a2e] sys_execve+0x2e/0x80 [0.600241] [c0106342] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [0.600253] === [0.600259] Code: 24 08 89 44 24 0c 89 74 24 04 c7 04 24 98 3c 44 c0 e8 c9 36 02 00 8b 45 ec 83 c3 20 8b 90 00 0b 00 00 39 d6 72 c0 e9 04 ff ff ff 0f 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe 8d b6 00 00 00 00 8d bf 00 00 00 00 55 [0.600370] EIP: [c0101b7c] xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 SS:ESP e021:c2417be4 [0.600393] ---[ end trace a686db401f06e173 ]--- [0.600403] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! full dmesg, config here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-02/msg00716.html Best regards, Arnd Hannemann -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Arnd Hannemann wrote: This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the guest. I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it a while ago, but I don't know that its had any real attention since. I've been making sure non-PAE compiles, but I've been lax about testing it. This is the first usermode exec, I guess? The backtrace is a bit odd; I've never seen a problem in move_page_tables before. Does xm dmesg tell you what Xen is complaining about? You may need to compile with debug=y in Config.mk. [0.599806] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0 [0.599816] call 1/2: op=26 arg=[c1051860] result=0 [0.599825] call 2/2: op=14 arg=[bf9c7000] result=-22 [0.599841] [ cut here ] [0.599851] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:103! [0.599861] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP [0.599871] Modules linked in: [0.599879] [0.599885] Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted (2.6.24.2 #6) [0.599895] EIP: 0061:[c0101b7c] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 [0.599910] EIP is at xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 [0.599919] EAX: EBX: c10510a0 ECX: c1051060 EDX: c1051060 [0.599930] ESI: 0002 EDI: 0001 EBP: c2417c10 ESP: c2417be4 [0.599940] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: SS: e021 [0.599951] Process init (pid: 1, ti=c2417000 task=c2416ab0 task.ti=c2417000) [0.599960] Stack: c0443c98 0002 0002 000e bf9c7000 ffea c1051060 0200 [0.599984]0067 c193fffc bf9c7000 c2417c18 c0101112 c2417c5c c0166dfc c193ce40 [0.66]c193e5c0 c000 c193e5c0 1000 c000 c193ce40 c198e71c c10331cc [0.600029] Call Trace: [0.600036] [c0107a6a] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 [0.600050] [c0107b29] show_stack_log_lvl+0xa9/0xd0 [0.600062] [c0107c1a] show_registers+0xca/0x1e0 [0.600074] [c0107e4a] die+0x11a/0x250 [0.600085] [c0108003] do_trap+0x83/0xb0 [0.600096] [c0108318] do_invalid_op+0x88/0xa0 [0.600108] [c03e89d2] error_code+0x72/0x80 [0.600121] [c0101112] xen_leave_lazy+0x12/0x20 [0.600134] [c0166dfc] move_page_tables+0x27c/0x300 [0.600149] [c0174762] setup_arg_pages+0x162/0x2a0 [0.600162] [c019cad3] load_elf_binary+0x3d3/0x1bd0 [0.600175] [c0173f92] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600190] [c019b1ef] load_script+0x1bf/0x200 [0.600202] [c0173f92] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600215] [c0175bab] do_execve+0x15b/0x180 [0.600227] [c0104a2e] sys_execve+0x2e/0x80 [0.600241] [c0106342] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [0.600253] === [0.600259] Code: 24 08 89 44 24 0c 89 74 24 04 c7 04 24 98 3c 44 c0 e8 c9 36 02 00 8b 45 ec 83 c3 20 8b 90 00 0b 00 00 39 d6 72 c0 e9 04 ff ff ff 0f 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe 8d b6 00 00 00 00 8d bf 00 00 00 00 55 [0.600370] EIP: [c0101b7c] xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 SS:ESP e021:c2417be4 [0.600393] ---[ end trace a686db401f06e173 ]--- [0.600403] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! full dmesg, config here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-02/msg00716.html Best regards, Arnd Hannemann J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Arnd Hannemann wrote: This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the guest. I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it a while ago, but I don't know that its had any real attention since. I've been making sure non-PAE compiles, but I've been lax about testing it. This is the first usermode exec, I guess? The backtrace is a bit odd; I've never seen a problem in move_page_tables before. Yes its trying to execute the first script in initramfs, I also tried with initramdisk and got a similar error. (move_page_tables also involved) Does xm dmesg tell you what Xen is complaining about? You may need to compile with debug=y in Config.mk. (XEN) mm.c:645:d44 Non-privileged (44) attempt to map I/O space I will recompile with debug=y and post the output. If I reduce the dom0 memory with dom0_mem=20 I see something like 0080 with dom0_mem=80 I always see . [0.599806] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0 [0.599816] call 1/2: op=26 arg=[c1051860] result=0 [0.599825] call 2/2: op=14 arg=[bf9c7000] result=-22 [0.599841] [ cut here ] [0.599851] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/multicalls.c:103! [0.599861] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP [0.599871] Modules linked in: [0.599879] [0.599885] Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted (2.6.24.2 #6) [0.599895] EIP: 0061:[c0101b7c] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 [0.599910] EIP is at xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 [0.599919] EAX: EBX: c10510a0 ECX: c1051060 EDX: c1051060 [0.599930] ESI: 0002 EDI: 0001 EBP: c2417c10 ESP: c2417be4 [0.599940] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: SS: e021 [0.599951] Process init (pid: 1, ti=c2417000 task=c2416ab0 task.ti=c2417000) [0.599960] Stack: c0443c98 0002 0002 000e bf9c7000 ffea c1051060 0200 [0.599984]0067 c193fffc bf9c7000 c2417c18 c0101112 c2417c5c c0166dfc c193ce40 [0.66]c193e5c0 c000 c193e5c0 1000 c000 c193ce40 c198e71c c10331cc [0.600029] Call Trace: [0.600036] [c0107a6a] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 [0.600050] [c0107b29] show_stack_log_lvl+0xa9/0xd0 [0.600062] [c0107c1a] show_registers+0xca/0x1e0 [0.600074] [c0107e4a] die+0x11a/0x250 [0.600085] [c0108003] do_trap+0x83/0xb0 [0.600096] [c0108318] do_invalid_op+0x88/0xa0 [0.600108] [c03e89d2] error_code+0x72/0x80 [0.600121] [c0101112] xen_leave_lazy+0x12/0x20 [0.600134] [c0166dfc] move_page_tables+0x27c/0x300 [0.600149] [c0174762] setup_arg_pages+0x162/0x2a0 [0.600162] [c019cad3] load_elf_binary+0x3d3/0x1bd0 [0.600175] [c0173f92] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600190] [c019b1ef] load_script+0x1bf/0x200 [0.600202] [c0173f92] search_binary_handler+0x92/0x200 [0.600215] [c0175bab] do_execve+0x15b/0x180 [0.600227] [c0104a2e] sys_execve+0x2e/0x80 [0.600241] [c0106342] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [0.600253] === [0.600259] Code: 24 08 89 44 24 0c 89 74 24 04 c7 04 24 98 3c 44 c0 e8 c9 36 02 00 8b 45 ec 83 c3 20 8b 90 00 0b 00 00 39 d6 72 c0 e9 04 ff ff ff 0f 0b eb fe 0f 0b eb fe 8d b6 00 00 00 00 8d bf 00 00 00 00 55 [0.600370] EIP: [c0101b7c] xen_mc_flush+0x19c/0x1b0 SS:ESP e021:c2417be4 [0.600393] ---[ end trace a686db401f06e173 ]--- [0.600403] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! full dmesg, config here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-02/msg00716.html Best regards, Arnd Hannemann J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] let XEN depend on PAE
Arnd Hannemann wrote: Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: Arnd Hannemann wrote: This is with 2.6.24.2, but latest-git looks the same: I also tried with 2.6.23 which crashes instantly, without any output of the guest. I'm not too surprised. Non-PAE Xen is a bit of a rarity, and it only gets tested rarely. Chris Wright did spend some time on it a while ago, but I don't know that its had any real attention since. I've been making sure non-PAE compiles, but I've been lax about testing it. This is the first usermode exec, I guess? The backtrace is a bit odd; I've never seen a problem in move_page_tables before. Yes its trying to execute the first script in initramfs, I also tried with initramdisk and got a similar error. (move_page_tables also involved) Does xm dmesg tell you what Xen is complaining about? You may need to compile with debug=y in Config.mk. (XEN) mm.c:645:d44 Non-privileged (44) attempt to map I/O space I will recompile with debug=y and post the output. If I reduce the dom0 memory with dom0_mem=20 I see something like 0080 with dom0_mem=80 I always see . That's helpful. Looks like the mfn is getting mushed to 0. J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
