Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
David Miller wrote: > >> Subject: Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are >> not propagated. via sysctl too >> Submitter : Serge van den Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> References: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 >> Handled-By: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has > existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it > doesn't belong on the regression list. I'm fairly sure that this originates with 2.6.21 as it looks very similar to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8519 which I filed at that time and which I traced to 8030f54499925d07. I've never been convinced that that change was correct, but as it now "works for me" due to changes in the Debian default configuration files, I decided to not follow up. Of course, not honoring 'all' is more obviously a bug than not honoring 'default' for existing interfaces. I've added a comment to #8519. Hope this helps, Frans Pop - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Monday, 29 October 2007 02:17, David Miller wrote: > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:51:55 +0100 > > > Subject : Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are not > > propagated. via sysctl too > > Submitter : Serge van den Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 > > Handled-By : Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has > existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it > doesn't belong on the regression list. I have removed it from the list. Thanks, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:51:55 +0100 > Subject : Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are not > propagated. via sysctl too > Submitter : Serge van den Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 > Handled-By: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it doesn't belong on the regression list. The bug reporter says something that drives me a little batty, which is probably what got this onto the regression list. He says "2.6.22 (not sure)" as the most recent kernel where the problem didn't occur. People should list no version at all if they don't know, otherwise we'll just get more bogons on the regression list. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 23:53, Alan Cox wrote: > > Subject : 2.6.24-rc1: pata_acpi fails to activate DMA for > > DVD-ROM on ALi M5229 secondary channel > > Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=119342005216716=2 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252 > > Handled-By : Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 2.6.23 did not have pata_acpi. Its also not clear this is a bug in > pata_acpi as opposed to pata_ali which knows about the ALi quirks. The > ACPI and ATA specs sort of disagree here so I'll be trying to fix it > anyway. OK, but please let me keep that on the list. It may cause some people to experience problems that were not present before functionality-wise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 23:48, Frans Pop wrote: > The regression in process CPU usage display in top is still there: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135 > > It's a regression from .22, not from .23, but I guess it should still be > listed. Well, my intention is to list the most recent regressions in these messages. Your regression is in the bugzilla, is marked as a regression and linked to the appropriate meta bug entry ... Well, perhaps I'll be able to send a "post 2.6.22 regressions" message with a longer list from time to time, but I can't promise that. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
> Subject : 2.6.24-rc1: pata_acpi fails to activate DMA for > DVD-ROM on ALi M5229 secondary channel > Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=119342005216716=2 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252 > Handled-By: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.6.23 did not have pata_acpi. Its also not clear this is a bug in pata_acpi as opposed to pata_ali which knows about the ALi quirks. The ACPI and ATA specs sort of disagree here so I'll be trying to fix it anyway. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
Subject : 2.6.24-rc1: pata_acpi fails to activate DMA for DVD-ROM on ALi M5229 secondary channel Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=119342005216716w=2 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252 Handled-By: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.6.23 did not have pata_acpi. Its also not clear this is a bug in pata_acpi as opposed to pata_ali which knows about the ALi quirks. The ACPI and ATA specs sort of disagree here so I'll be trying to fix it anyway. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 23:48, Frans Pop wrote: The regression in process CPU usage display in top is still there: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135 It's a regression from .22, not from .23, but I guess it should still be listed. Well, my intention is to list the most recent regressions in these messages. Your regression is in the bugzilla, is marked as a regression and linked to the appropriate meta bug entry ... Well, perhaps I'll be able to send a post 2.6.22 regressions message with a longer list from time to time, but I can't promise that. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 23:53, Alan Cox wrote: Subject : 2.6.24-rc1: pata_acpi fails to activate DMA for DVD-ROM on ALi M5229 secondary channel Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=119342005216716w=2 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252 Handled-By : Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.6.23 did not have pata_acpi. Its also not clear this is a bug in pata_acpi as opposed to pata_ali which knows about the ALi quirks. The ACPI and ATA specs sort of disagree here so I'll be trying to fix it anyway. OK, but please let me keep that on the list. It may cause some people to experience problems that were not present before functionality-wise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:51:55 +0100 Subject : Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are not propagated. via sysctl too Submitter : Serge van den Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 Handled-By: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it doesn't belong on the regression list. The bug reporter says something that drives me a little batty, which is probably what got this onto the regression list. He says 2.6.22 (not sure) as the most recent kernel where the problem didn't occur. People should list no version at all if they don't know, otherwise we'll just get more bogons on the regression list. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
On Monday, 29 October 2007 02:17, David Miller wrote: From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:51:55 +0100 Subject : Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are not propagated. via sysctl too Submitter : Serge van den Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 Handled-By : Hideaki YOSHIFUJI [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it doesn't belong on the regression list. I have removed it from the list. Thanks, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
David Miller wrote: Subject: Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are not propagated. via sysctl too Submitter : Serge van den Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224 Handled-By: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it doesn't belong on the regression list. I'm fairly sure that this originates with 2.6.21 as it looks very similar to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8519 which I filed at that time and which I traced to 8030f54499925d07. I've never been convinced that that change was correct, but as it now works for me due to changes in the Debian default configuration files, I decided to not follow up. Of course, not honoring 'all' is more obviously a bug than not honoring 'default' for existing interfaces. I've added a comment to #8519. Hope this helps, Frans Pop - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
