Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-07-01 Thread Pierre Etchemaite


On 28-Jun-2001 Tim Moore wrote:
>> (I wrote)
>> Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot
>> when using PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.
>> 
>> Disabling MMX optimizations in this software would "solve" the
>> problem.  Another solution found on the web (sorry, I don't have
>> the URL at hand) is to add two or three additionnal capacitors on
>> the back of the board, to solve the electric instabilities that
>> cause the reboots.
> 
> This is incorrect information.  Abit BP6 early revs suffered under load
> from a 100uF cap (EC10, between the CPU sockets) that should have been
> 1500uF.  This was compounded by a weak or otherwise inadequate power
> supply.
> 
> Having run literally 7 P3F-Fs and 6 of their P2B-F predecessors, not a
> single one had any problems.  They were the premiere overclocking boards
> of their day.

Don't get me wrong, I like ASUS boards, and BX chipset boards were a
very safe choice at the time, that's why this problem was very
disturbing when I experienced it on 2 or 3 boards (out of more than 100,
but I guess many never ran Photoshop since then).

I digged my archives.

Adobe Knowledgebase article about the problem
(http://www.adobe.com/support/techdocs/2256a.htm) mentions spontaneous
reboots with Dell Optiplex GX1, ASUS P2B-F and ASUS P3B-F.

I could not find anything about the problem on ASUS websites at the
time.

(unofficial) P2B-(L)S fixing is documented here:
http://www.turbotech.ch/articles2000/000815-p2bls_rework-01.html

(unofficial) CUBX fixing (some of those are also affected):
http://members.ams.chello.nl/mgherard/html/photoshop.html

Best regards,
Pierre.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-28 Thread Tim Moore

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of 
>the problem.  It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
> 
> I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd, 
>Sound card, video, modem, NIC, scsi card) but my last tyan was fine with that load it 
>may be a kt7a thing.
> 
> Several people said that random (keyword here) oopses are more often a hardware 
>thing.  I wonder if the kt7a is going to be able to perform  fully loaded..
> 
> is anyone running one fully loaded? 4 ide drives, 2 floppy, (5 pci and 1 isa) or 
>6pci, agp, 512MEG+ RAM?
> 
> Joe

Similar board (KA7) had non-heat related lockups with 133MHz FSB (1756
BogoM).  100MHz FSB + 4 way interleave has been fast and stable (1690
BogoM).

/dev/hda:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.00 seconds =128.00 MB/sec

Abit KA7 (VT82C686a, rev 22), Athlon 850, 2x256MB PC133@CL2, 2 ide,
CR-RW, Colorado Travan, linux 2.2.20p6+ide.2.2.19.04092001, SPI 300W
power, PCI: Firewire, Netgear FA310TX, Turtle Beach Santa Cruz audio,
AGP: 32MB TNT2.

CONFIG_M686=y
CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y
CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_TSC=y
CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y
CONFIG_1GB=y
CONFIG_MTRR=y

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-28 Thread Tim Moore

> Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot when using
> PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.
> 
> Disabling MMX optimizations in this software would "solve" the problem. Another
> solution found on the web (sorry, I don't have the URL at hand) is to add two
> or three additionnal capacitors on the back of the board, to solve the electric
> instabilities that cause the reboots.

This is incorrect information.  Abit BP6 early revs suffered under load
from a 100uF cap (EC10, between the CPU sockets) that should have been
1500uF.  This was compounded by a weak or otherwise inadequate power
supply.

Having run literally 7 P3F-Fs and 6 of their P2B-F predecessors, not a
single one had any problems.  They were the premiere overclocking boards
of their day.

rgds,
Tim.

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-28 Thread Pierre Etchemaite


Le 26-Jun-2001, Alex Deucher écrivait :
> What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
> athlon optimizations.

Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot when using
PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.

Disabling MMX optimizations in this software would "solve" the problem. Another
solution found on the web (sorry, I don't have the URL at hand) is to add two
or three additionnal capacitors on the back of the board, to solve the electric
instabilities that cause the reboots.

So yes, I can believe that that sort of "corner case" problems exist.

Best regards,
Pierre.


-- 
We are the dot in 0.2 Kb/s
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-28 Thread Tim Moore

 Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot when using
 PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.
 
 Disabling MMX optimizations in this software would solve the problem. Another
 solution found on the web (sorry, I don't have the URL at hand) is to add two
 or three additionnal capacitors on the back of the board, to solve the electric
 instabilities that cause the reboots.

This is incorrect information.  Abit BP6 early revs suffered under load
from a 100uF cap (EC10, between the CPU sockets) that should have been
1500uF.  This was compounded by a weak or otherwise inadequate power
supply.

Having run literally 7 P3F-Fs and 6 of their P2B-F predecessors, not a
single one had any problems.  They were the premiere overclocking boards
of their day.

rgds,
Tim.

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-28 Thread Tim Moore

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of 
the problem.  It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
 
 I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd, 
Sound card, video, modem, NIC, scsi card) but my last tyan was fine with that load it 
may be a kt7a thing.
 
 Several people said that random (keyword here) oopses are more often a hardware 
thing.  I wonder if the kt7a is going to be able to perform  fully loaded..
 
 is anyone running one fully loaded? 4 ide drives, 2 floppy, (5 pci and 1 isa) or 
6pci, agp, 512MEG+ RAM?
 
 Joe

Similar board (KA7) had non-heat related lockups with 133MHz FSB (1756
BogoM).  100MHz FSB + 4 way interleave has been fast and stable (1690
BogoM).

/dev/hda:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  1.00 seconds =128.00 MB/sec

Abit KA7 (VT82C686a, rev 22), Athlon 850, 2x256MB PC133@CL2, 2 ide,
CR-RW, Colorado Travan, linux 2.2.20p6+ide.2.2.19.04092001, SPI 300W
power, PCI: Firewire, Netgear FA310TX, Turtle Beach Santa Cruz audio,
AGP: 32MB TNT2.

CONFIG_M686=y
CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y
CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_TSC=y
CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y
CONFIG_1GB=y
CONFIG_MTRR=y

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-28 Thread Pierre Etchemaite


Le 26-Jun-2001, Alex Deucher écrivait :
 What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
 athlon optimizations.

Some ASUS boards (mostly P3B-F) would either freeze or self reboot when using
PhotoShop 5. Everything else would run perfectly.

Disabling MMX optimizations in this software would solve the problem. Another
solution found on the web (sorry, I don't have the URL at hand) is to add two
or three additionnal capacitors on the back of the board, to solve the electric
instabilities that cause the reboots.

So yes, I can believe that that sort of corner case problems exist.

Best regards,
Pierre.


-- 
We are the dot in 0.2 Kb/s
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-27 Thread Luigi Genoni



On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of 
>the problem.  It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
I would have bet that power supply was erogating elettricity with a
discontinous intensity.
I saw that RAM stability is the first think to be affected (together
with L2 cache stability) in those cases.
>
> I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd, 
>Sound card, video, modem, NIC, scsi card) but my last tyan was fine with that load it 
>may be a kt7a thing.
>
> Several people said that random (keyword here) oopses are more often a hardware 
>thing.  I wonder if the kt7a is going to be able to perform  fully loaded..
>
> is anyone running one fully loaded? 4 ide drives, 2 floppy, (5 pci and 1 isa) or 
>6pci, agp, 512MEG+ RAM?

yes,

1.300 Mhz

1 agp
4 pci
1 isa (I love my sound blaster 16 on ISA, could not live without)
3 disks
1 floppy
1 zip
1 dvd
5 fans

350 watt power supply.


Luigi

> Joe
>
> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
> > actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
> > some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
> > optimisation if you set the BIOS options to 'conservative' not 'optimised'
>
> Interesting, and plausable theory. It would be more interesting to see
> register dumps of the memory timing registers on both good and bad
> systems, to see if this is the case.
>
> Unfortunatly afair the register level specs of all the affected chipsets
> are not available.
>
> regards,
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> | Dave Jones.http://www.suse.de/~davej
> | SuSE Labs
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-27 Thread joeja

Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of 
the problem.  It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).  

I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd, 
Sound card, video, modem, NIC, scsi card) but my last tyan was fine with that load it 
may be a kt7a thing. 

Several people said that random (keyword here) oopses are more often a hardware thing. 
 I wonder if the kt7a is going to be able to perform  fully loaded.. 

is anyone running one fully loaded? 4 ide drives, 2 floppy, (5 pci and 1 isa) or 6pci, 
agp, 512MEG+ RAM?

Joe 

Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
> actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
> some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
> optimisation if you set the BIOS options to 'conservative' not 'optimised'

Interesting, and plausable theory. It would be more interesting to see
register dumps of the memory timing registers on both good and bad
systems, to see if this is the case.

Unfortunatly afair the register level specs of all the affected chipsets
are not available.

regards,

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.http://www.suse.de/~davej
| SuSE Labs


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-27 Thread joeja

Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of 
the problem.  It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).  

I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd, 
Sound card, video, modem, NIC, scsi card) but my last tyan was fine with that load it 
may be a kt7a thing. 

Several people said that random (keyword here) oopses are more often a hardware thing. 
 I wonder if the kt7a is going to be able to perform  fully loaded.. 

is anyone running one fully loaded? 4 ide drives, 2 floppy, (5 pci and 1 isa) or 6pci, 
agp, 512MEG+ RAM?

Joe 

Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
 My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
 actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
 some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
 optimisation if you set the BIOS options to 'conservative' not 'optimised'

Interesting, and plausable theory. It would be more interesting to see
register dumps of the memory timing registers on both good and bad
systems, to see if this is the case.

Unfortunatly afair the register level specs of all the affected chipsets
are not available.

regards,

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.http://www.suse.de/~davej
| SuSE Labs


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-27 Thread Luigi Genoni



On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Well considering the other night the power supply went dead, I think that is part of 
the problem.  It is brand new, and I am being sent another one (free of course).
I would have bet that power supply was erogating elettricity with a
discontinous intensity.
I saw that RAM stability is the first think to be affected (together
with L2 cache stability) in those cases.

 I also had my mb loaded at the time (scsi cd-rw, cdrom, internal zip, floppy, 1 hd, 
Sound card, video, modem, NIC, scsi card) but my last tyan was fine with that load it 
may be a kt7a thing.

 Several people said that random (keyword here) oopses are more often a hardware 
thing.  I wonder if the kt7a is going to be able to perform  fully loaded..

 is anyone running one fully loaded? 4 ide drives, 2 floppy, (5 pci and 1 isa) or 
6pci, agp, 512MEG+ RAM?

yes,

1.300 Mhz

1 agp
4 pci
1 isa (I love my sound blaster 16 on ISA, could not live without)
3 disks
1 floppy
1 zip
1 dvd
5 fans

350 watt power supply.


Luigi

 Joe

 Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
  My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
  actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
  some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
  optimisation if you set the BIOS options to 'conservative' not 'optimised'

 Interesting, and plausable theory. It would be more interesting to see
 register dumps of the memory timing registers on both good and bad
 systems, to see if this is the case.

 Unfortunatly afair the register level specs of all the affected chipsets
 are not available.

 regards,

 Dave.

 --
 | Dave Jones.http://www.suse.de/~davej
 | SuSE Labs


 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Dave Jones

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

> My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
> actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
> some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
> optimisation if you set the BIOS options to 'conservative' not 'optimised'

Interesting, and plausable theory. It would be more interesting to see
register dumps of the memory timing registers on both good and bad
systems, to see if this is the case.

Unfortunatly afair the register level specs of all the affected chipsets
are not available.

regards,

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.http://www.suse.de/~davej
| SuSE Labs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alan Cox

> What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
> athlon optimizations.  I'm not sure how much of a speed improvement they

That fits the pattern beautifully. 

> provide, but everything's fine with i686, so I can't complain, besides I
> doubt I can return the board at this point anyway.  BTW, which would be
> better with an athlon, k6 or i686 optimization?  I've heard i686 is
> faster, but I've never really looked into it too much myself.

The optimisations are worth several %age points on some benchmarks - the
prefetching memory copier it uses basically hits the full bus bandwidth on
memory copies which rep movs will not do.

My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
optimisation if you set the BIOS options to 'conservative' not 'optimised'

Equally we don't see the problem on AMD chipset boards and we don't know if
that indicates a bug in the kernel not tripped on such boards or a chipset
problem (even BIOS setuo maybe) on the VIA.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alex Deucher

What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
athlon optimizations.  I'm not sure how much of a speed improvement they
provide, but everything's fine with i686, so I can't complain, besides I
doubt I can return the board at this point anyway.  BTW, which would be
better with an athlon, k6 or i686 optimization?  I've heard i686 is
faster, but I've never really looked into it too much myself.

Thanks,

Alex

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
> > 7.1, athlon 850 system.  runs rock solid when I compile for i686.  I
> > assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
> > athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
> > while back on the LKML.
> 
> Most IWILL K266 people report this. Those who swapped them for other boards
> mostly report the problem then going away. Yes it could be a bug we trigger
> that by chance the IWILL boards show up more than others but I'm sceptical
> 
> Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alan Cox

> I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
> 7.1, athlon 850 system.  runs rock solid when I compile for i686.  I
> assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
> athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
> while back on the LKML.

Most IWILL K266 people report this. Those who swapped them for other boards
mostly report the problem then going away. Yes it could be a bug we trigger
that by chance the IWILL boards show up more than others but I'm sceptical

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alex Deucher

I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
7.1, athlon 850 system.  runs rock solid when I compile for i686.  I
assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
while back on the LKML.

athlon 850 (200 FSB)
512 MB RAM
IWILL KK266

Alex



I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz
FSB) processor / 512Meg of RAM, and an
Asus kt7a motherboard. 

It is oppsing left and right. I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as
the CPU but keep getting these oopses.. 

I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1 

Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these
problems? 

Joe please cc me as I am not on this list. 
- 
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
in 
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alan Cox

> With 2.2.x Kernel my System runs stable, but when i'm using whatever 2.4.x kernel i 
>like,
> i get the oopses and processcrashes (but only when i'm NOT root!)

That bit is fascinating. Do you do different things as non root ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Thomas Foerster

Hi,

> I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).

> Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
> be at less 300 Watt).
> If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
> is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.

I have a 400 Watt power supply.
With 2.2.x Kernel my System runs stable, but when i'm using whatever 2.4.x kernel i 
like,
i get the oopses and processcrashes (but only when i'm NOT root!)

Thomas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Luigi Genoni

I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).

Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
be at less 300 Watt).
If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.

I usually do a little overvolt of the vcore to 3.4, and this makes things
more stable. For what i know, the Athlon optimizzation does stress
the memory I/O at best, and does use the Athlon FSB with all its power.

Using the pentiumII/III stuff, you loose this memory performance boost.

If a little overvolt of the VCORE does not solve the things,
(someone also does a little overvolt of the CPU core to 1.78)
then check if your power supply if working well, and the signal strenght
setting inside of your bios (should be 2).

This is just my experience with Athlon processors.

Luigi


On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Thomas Foerster wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > as i've said before - i have the same problem too
>
> Me too
>
> > the memory is OK! - have run memtest86 for hours ... - no errors ... -
> > heatsink - CPU@45°C - Case @ 25°C
>
> > after changing the kernel compile to PentiumII (nearly) everything worked
> > fine 
>
> I HAD a Asus K7M with a 650 MHz Athlon, 256 MB RAM (Infineon, Ram is OK).
> Using 2.4.2 AND 2.4.4 didn't work.
> Whenever i started KDE2, the crashes startet, even oopses in ext2-code appeared.
>
> The strange thing is : If i startet KDE2 as root, the crashes didn't happen!
>
> I don't know why, my distribution is RedHat 7.1
>
> Now i have a Epox 8kta3+ with an 1,333 MHz Athlon, FSB266, 256 MB RAM (Infineon)
> and the crashes still appear.
>
> Changing the Kernel from Athlon to Pentium-II/III makes the system stable again.
>
> Thomas
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Thomas Foerster

Hi,

> as i've said before - i have the same problem too

Me too

> the memory is OK! - have run memtest86 for hours ... - no errors ... -
> heatsink - CPU@45°C - Case @ 25°C

> after changing the kernel compile to PentiumII (nearly) everything worked
> fine 

I HAD a Asus K7M with a 650 MHz Athlon, 256 MB RAM (Infineon, Ram is OK).
Using 2.4.2 AND 2.4.4 didn't work.
Whenever i started KDE2, the crashes startet, even oopses in ext2-code appeared.

The strange thing is : If i startet KDE2 as root, the crashes didn't happen!

I don't know why, my distribution is RedHat 7.1

Now i have a Epox 8kta3+ with an 1,333 MHz Athlon, FSB266, 256 MB RAM (Infineon)
and the crashes still appear.

Changing the Kernel from Athlon to Pentium-II/III makes the system stable again.

Thomas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Thomas Kotzian

as i've said before - i have the same problem too

the memory is OK! - have run memtest86 for hours ... - no errors ... -
heatsink - CPU@45°C - Case @ 25°C

after changing the kernel compile to PentiumII (nearly) everything worked
fine 

2.4.6pre5 works as PentiumII but not as Athlon
2.4.5ac16 doesn't work at all - random oopses ..

ThomasK.

- Original Message -
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: AMD thunderbird oops


> > I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz
FSB) processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
> >
> > It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as
the CPU but keep getting these oopses..
> >
> > I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
> >
> > Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these
problems?
>
> Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
> even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
> the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a
faulty
> component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff
>
> memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Thomas Foerster

Hi,

 as i've said before - i have the same problem too

Me too

 the memory is OK! - have run memtest86 for hours ... - no errors ... -
 heatsink - CPU@45°C - Case @ 25°C

 after changing the kernel compile to PentiumII (nearly) everything worked
 fine 

I HAD a Asus K7M with a 650 MHz Athlon, 256 MB RAM (Infineon, Ram is OK).
Using 2.4.2 AND 2.4.4 didn't work.
Whenever i started KDE2, the crashes startet, even oopses in ext2-code appeared.

The strange thing is : If i startet KDE2 as root, the crashes didn't happen!

I don't know why, my distribution is RedHat 7.1

Now i have a Epox 8kta3+ with an 1,333 MHz Athlon, FSB266, 256 MB RAM (Infineon)
and the crashes still appear.

Changing the Kernel from Athlon to Pentium-II/III makes the system stable again.

Thomas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Luigi Genoni

I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).

Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
be at less 300 Watt).
If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.

I usually do a little overvolt of the vcore to 3.4, and this makes things
more stable. For what i know, the Athlon optimizzation does stress
the memory I/O at best, and does use the Athlon FSB with all its power.

Using the pentiumII/III stuff, you loose this memory performance boost.

If a little overvolt of the VCORE does not solve the things,
(someone also does a little overvolt of the CPU core to 1.78)
then check if your power supply if working well, and the signal strenght
setting inside of your bios (should be 2).

This is just my experience with Athlon processors.

Luigi


On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Thomas Foerster wrote:

 Hi,

  as i've said before - i have the same problem too

 Me too

  the memory is OK! - have run memtest86 for hours ... - no errors ... -
  heatsink - CPU@45°C - Case @ 25°C

  after changing the kernel compile to PentiumII (nearly) everything worked
  fine 

 I HAD a Asus K7M with a 650 MHz Athlon, 256 MB RAM (Infineon, Ram is OK).
 Using 2.4.2 AND 2.4.4 didn't work.
 Whenever i started KDE2, the crashes startet, even oopses in ext2-code appeared.

 The strange thing is : If i startet KDE2 as root, the crashes didn't happen!

 I don't know why, my distribution is RedHat 7.1

 Now i have a Epox 8kta3+ with an 1,333 MHz Athlon, FSB266, 256 MB RAM (Infineon)
 and the crashes still appear.

 Changing the Kernel from Athlon to Pentium-II/III makes the system stable again.

 Thomas

 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Thomas Foerster

Hi,

 I went trought 8 Athlon, (latest 1300 Mhz 200Mhz FSB).

 Usually those stability problems are related to power supply (it should
 be at less 300 Watt).
 If the power supply does not give enought Ampere, and the energy
 is fluttuant, the Athlon cpu really suffers.

I have a 400 Watt power supply.
With 2.2.x Kernel my System runs stable, but when i'm using whatever 2.4.x kernel i 
like,
i get the oopses and processcrashes (but only when i'm NOT root!)

Thomas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alan Cox

 With 2.2.x Kernel my System runs stable, but when i'm using whatever 2.4.x kernel i 
like,
 i get the oopses and processcrashes (but only when i'm NOT root!)

That bit is fascinating. Do you do different things as non root ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alex Deucher

I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
7.1, athlon 850 system.  runs rock solid when I compile for i686.  I
assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
while back on the LKML.

athlon 850 (200 FSB)
512 MB RAM
IWILL KK266

Alex



I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz
FSB) processor / 512Meg of RAM, and an
Asus kt7a motherboard. 

It is oppsing left and right. I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as
the CPU but keep getting these oopses.. 

I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1 

Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these
problems? 

Joe please cc me as I am not on this list. 
- 
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
in 
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Thomas Kotzian

as i've said before - i have the same problem too

the memory is OK! - have run memtest86 for hours ... - no errors ... -
heatsink - CPU@45°C - Case @ 25°C

after changing the kernel compile to PentiumII (nearly) everything worked
fine 

2.4.6pre5 works as PentiumII but not as Athlon
2.4.5ac16 doesn't work at all - random oopses ..

ThomasK.

- Original Message -
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: AMD thunderbird oops


  I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz
FSB) processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
 
  It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as
the CPU but keep getting these oopses..
 
  I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
 
  Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these
problems?

 Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
 even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
 the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a
faulty
 component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff

 memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends

 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alan Cox

 What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
 athlon optimizations.  I'm not sure how much of a speed improvement they

That fits the pattern beautifully. 

 provide, but everything's fine with i686, so I can't complain, besides I
 doubt I can return the board at this point anyway.  BTW, which would be
 better with an athlon, k6 or i686 optimization?  I've heard i686 is
 faster, but I've never really looked into it too much myself.

The optimisations are worth several %age points on some benchmarks - the
prefetching memory copier it uses basically hits the full bus bandwidth on
memory copies which rep movs will not do.

My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
optimisation if you set the BIOS options to 'conservative' not 'optimised'

Equally we don't see the problem on AMD chipset boards and we don't know if
that indicates a bug in the kernel not tripped on such boards or a chipset
problem (even BIOS setuo maybe) on the VIA.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alex Deucher

What's weird though is that it is rock solid as long as I don't use
athlon optimizations.  I'm not sure how much of a speed improvement they
provide, but everything's fine with i686, so I can't complain, besides I
doubt I can return the board at this point anyway.  BTW, which would be
better with an athlon, k6 or i686 optimization?  I've heard i686 is
faster, but I've never really looked into it too much myself.

Thanks,

Alex

Alan Cox wrote:
 
  I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
  7.1, athlon 850 system.  runs rock solid when I compile for i686.  I
  assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
  athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
  while back on the LKML.
 
 Most IWILL K266 people report this. Those who swapped them for other boards
 mostly report the problem then going away. Yes it could be a bug we trigger
 that by chance the IWILL boards show up more than others but I'm sceptical
 
 Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Dave Jones

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:

 My current speculation is that the sdram setup on some of these boards can't
 actually take the full CPU spec caused by these hand tuned routines. There is
 some evidence to support that as several other boards only work with Athlon
 optimisation if you set the BIOS options to 'conservative' not 'optimised'

Interesting, and plausable theory. It would be more interesting to see
register dumps of the memory timing registers on both good and bad
systems, to see if this is the case.

Unfortunatly afair the register level specs of all the affected chipsets
are not available.

regards,

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.http://www.suse.de/~davej
| SuSE Labs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-26 Thread Alan Cox

 I get oopses too when I use kernels compiled for athlon on my redhat
 7.1, athlon 850 system.  runs rock solid when I compile for i686.  I
 assumed the athlon optimizations in the kernel were broken, or gcc's
 athlon optimization was, as I seem to recall some discussion of this a
 while back on the LKML.

Most IWILL K266 people report this. Those who swapped them for other boards
mostly report the problem then going away. Yes it could be a bug we trigger
that by chance the IWILL boards show up more than others but I'm sceptical

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Dan Hollis

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
> even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
> the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
> component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff

Ive found a number of problems can be traced to power supply problems, the
board providing a bit of under voltage. Manually adjusting CPU voltage a
notch or two up has fixed many a board for me.

Also manually adjusting SDRAM drive strength can help, BIOS sometimes gets
this wrong.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Luigi Genoni


Have you considered to change your dimm at all?
If they are bugged they should be under warranty.

Luigi


On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Thanks,
> I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4" fan 
>in the case. (real nice case).
>
> I think it is the memory, as yesterday my gcc was bombing with 'internel 
>compiler error', which is usually a good mem tester.  So I started setting mem=64m 
>and things worked better and the install went all the way through.  I think I need to 
>slow my drams down a bit or add some delay in the bios settings.
>
>The oops says something like 'kernel null pointer at address 0x00'.  How do I 
>'catch' the output of an oops when the filesystem goes and I get ext2fs errors and am 
>forced to reboot and manually run e2fsck?
>
> Lastly with the mem=64M or mem=128M when I do a make dep, I get an error message 
>that says Error 'missing seperator'.  What does that mean?  It stops in the 
>drivers/net dir when I get this message?
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) 
>processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.  >
> > It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but 
>keep getting these oopses..
> >
> > I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
> >
> > Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these problems?
>
> Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
> even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
> the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
> component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff
>
> memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread joeja

Thanks, 
I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4" fan in 
the case. (real nice case). 

I think it is the memory, as yesterday my gcc was bombing with 'internel compiler 
error', which is usually a good mem tester.  So I started setting mem=64m and things 
worked better and the install went all the way through.  I think I need to slow my 
drams down a bit or add some delay in the bios settings.  

   The oops says something like 'kernel null pointer at address 0x00'.  How do I 
'catch' the output of an oops when the filesystem goes and I get ext2fs errors and am 
forced to reboot and manually run e2fsck?  

Lastly with the mem=64M or mem=128M when I do a make dep, I get an error message 
that says Error 'missing seperator'.  What does that mean?  It stops in the 
drivers/net dir when I get this message?

Thanks
Joe

Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) 
>processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.  > 
> It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but 
>keep getting these oopses..
> 
> I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
> 
> Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these problems?

Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may 
even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff

memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Luigi Genoni

Works well for me, Athlon 1300 (200Mhz FSB).
Did you check your ram?

Luigi

On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) 
>processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
>
> It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but 
>keep getting these oopses..
>
> I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
>
> Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these problems?
>
> Joe please cc me as I am not on this list.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Alexander V. Bilichenko

Athlon TB CPUs >= 1000mhz potentially not stable at all because of great
heat-production, without correct hardware maintence - try to check whether
Your cpu overheating or cpu cooler make mighty vibration.

Best regards,
Alexander mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: AMD thunderbird oops


> > I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz
FSB) processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
> >
> > It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as
the CPU but keep getting these oopses..
> >
> > I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
> >
> > Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these
problems?
>
> Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
> even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
> the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a
faulty
> component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff
>
> memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Alan Cox

> I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) 
>processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.  
> 
> It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but 
>keep getting these oopses..
> 
> I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
> 
> Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these problems?

Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may 
even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff

memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Alexander V. Bilichenko

Athlon TB CPUs = 1000mhz potentially not stable at all because of great
heat-production, without correct hardware maintence - try to check whether
Your cpu overheating or cpu cooler make mighty vibration.

Best regards,
Alexander mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: AMD thunderbird oops


  I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz
FSB) processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.
 
  It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as
the CPU but keep getting these oopses..
 
  I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
 
  Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these
problems?

 Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
 even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
 the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a
faulty
 component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff

 memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends

 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Luigi Genoni

Works well for me, Athlon 1300 (200Mhz FSB).
Did you check your ram?

Luigi

On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) 
processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.

 It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but 
keep getting these oopses..

 I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1

 Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these problems?

 Joe please cc me as I am not on this list.
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Luigi Genoni


Have you considered to change your dimm at all?
If they are bugged they should be under warranty.

Luigi


On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks,
 I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4 fan 
in the case. (real nice case).

 I think it is the memory, as yesterday my gcc was bombing with 'internel 
compiler error', which is usually a good mem tester.  So I started setting mem=64m 
and things worked better and the install went all the way through.  I think I need to 
slow my drams down a bit or add some delay in the bios settings.

The oops says something like 'kernel null pointer at address 0x00'.  How do I 
'catch' the output of an oops when the filesystem goes and I get ext2fs errors and am 
forced to reboot and manually run e2fsck?

 Lastly with the mem=64M or mem=128M when I do a make dep, I get an error message 
that says Error 'missing seperator'.  What does that mean?  It stops in the 
drivers/net dir when I get this message?

 Thanks
 Joe

 Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) 
processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.  
  It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but 
keep getting these oopses..
 
  I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
 
  Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these problems?

 Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
 even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
 the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
 component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff

 memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends


 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Dan Hollis

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
 Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may
 even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
 the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
 component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff

Ive found a number of problems can be traced to power supply problems, the
board providing a bit of under voltage. Manually adjusting CPU voltage a
notch or two up has fixed many a board for me.

Also manually adjusting SDRAM drive strength can help, BIOS sometimes gets
this wrong.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread Alan Cox

 I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) 
processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.  
 
 It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but 
keep getting these oopses..
 
 I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
 
 Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these problems?

Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may 
even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff

memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: Re: AMD thunderbird oops

2001-06-25 Thread joeja

Thanks, 
I have a heat sink and it is huge about 2 inches, plus fan. Plus another 4 fan in 
the case. (real nice case). 

I think it is the memory, as yesterday my gcc was bombing with 'internel compiler 
error', which is usually a good mem tester.  So I started setting mem=64m and things 
worked better and the install went all the way through.  I think I need to slow my 
drams down a bit or add some delay in the bios settings.  

   The oops says something like 'kernel null pointer at address 0x00'.  How do I 
'catch' the output of an oops when the filesystem goes and I get ext2fs errors and am 
forced to reboot and manually run e2fsck?  

Lastly with the mem=64M or mem=128M when I do a make dep, I get an error message 
that says Error 'missing seperator'.  What does that mean?  It stops in the 
drivers/net dir when I get this message?

Thanks
Joe

Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I just upgradede my system to an 1200Mhz AMD Athlon Thundirbird (266Mhz FSB) 
processor  / 512Meg of RAM, and an Asus kt7a motherboard.   
 It is oppsing left and right.  I recompiled the kernel with Athelon as the CPU but 
keep getting these oopses..
 
 I also get these same problems while trying to install RH 7.1
 
 Anyone know is this a supported processor / MB and has anyone had these problems?

Random oopses normally indicate faulty board cpu or ram (and the fault may 
even just be overheating or dimms not in the sockets cleanly). I doubt its
the board design or model that is the problem, you probably jut have a faulty
component somewhere if its oopsing randomly even during installs and stuff

memtest86, and heatsink compound may be your best friends


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/