Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

2000-10-06 Thread David S. Miller

   Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:45:47 -0200 (BRST)
   From: Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   2.2.17 is broken too. 

I've fixed it in my 2.2.x sources as well.
Thanks.

Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

2000-10-06 Thread Marcelo Tosatti


On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, David S. Miller wrote:

>Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:25:38 -0300 (BRST)
>From: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
>Is this an actual bug, or am I overlooking something?
> 
> It is a bug and I'll change TCP's sendmsg to use sk->allocation as it
> should.  Thanks for pointing this out.
 

2.2.17 is broken too. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

2000-10-06 Thread David S. Miller

   Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:25:38 -0300 (BRST)
   From: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   Is this an actual bug, or am I overlooking something?

It is a bug and I'll change TCP's sendmsg to use sk->allocation as it
should.  Thanks for pointing this out.

Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

2000-10-06 Thread David S. Miller

   Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:25:38 -0300 (BRST)
   From: Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Is this an actual bug, or am I overlooking something?

It is a bug and I'll change TCP's sendmsg to use sk-allocation as it
should.  Thanks for pointing this out.

Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

2000-10-06 Thread Marcelo Tosatti


On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, David S. Miller wrote:

Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2000 19:25:38 -0300 (BRST)
From: Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Is this an actual bug, or am I overlooking something?
 
 It is a bug and I'll change TCP's sendmsg to use sk-allocation as it
 should.  Thanks for pointing this out.
 

2.2.17 is broken too. 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: BUG in tcp.c ?

2000-10-06 Thread David S. Miller

   Date:   Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:45:47 -0200 (BRST)
   From: Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   2.2.17 is broken too. 

I've fixed it in my 2.2.x sources as well.
Thanks.

Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/