Re: Fw: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 UnionFS "BUG: atomic counter underflow"
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:59:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:48:35 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 04:56:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > fyi.. > > > > I got a bunch of patches queued up that should fix a few things - quite > > possibly this one too. > > > > I want to push the patches to korg, but in the mix is a fs/stack.c change & > > corresponding ecryptfs fix that should go to Linus's tree. The rest of the > > patches depend on this change. > > > > How do you want me to do this? I guess I'll just send all of them to lkml, > > and say which ones should go where in the 00/xx mail. > > Let's do that as a starting point. Alright, I'll try to spam the lists later today. > Perhaps we can fast-track the ecryptfs fix into mainline if it fixes > something there. Not necessary, they aren't bugfixes for fsstack/ecryptfs. > I don't want to kep the unionfs tree hanging around forever. We need to > work out whether we want to merge it. Agreed. Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. - Albert Einstein - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Fw: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 UnionFS "BUG: atomic counter underflow"
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:48:35 -0400 "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 04:56:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > fyi.. > > I got a bunch of patches queued up that should fix a few things - quite > possibly this one too. > > I want to push the patches to korg, but in the mix is a fs/stack.c change & > corresponding ecryptfs fix that should go to Linus's tree. The rest of the > patches depend on this change. > > How do you want me to do this? I guess I'll just send all of them to lkml, > and say which ones should go where in the 00/xx mail. Let's do that as a starting point. Perhaps we can fast-track the ecryptfs fix into mainline if it fixes something there. I don't want to kep the unionfs tree hanging around forever. We need to work out whether we want to merge it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Fw: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 UnionFS BUG: atomic counter underflow
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:48:35 -0400 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 04:56:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: fyi.. I got a bunch of patches queued up that should fix a few things - quite possibly this one too. I want to push the patches to korg, but in the mix is a fs/stack.c change corresponding ecryptfs fix that should go to Linus's tree. The rest of the patches depend on this change. How do you want me to do this? I guess I'll just send all of them to lkml, and say which ones should go where in the 00/xx mail. Let's do that as a starting point. Perhaps we can fast-track the ecryptfs fix into mainline if it fixes something there. I don't want to kep the unionfs tree hanging around forever. We need to work out whether we want to merge it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Fw: 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 UnionFS BUG: atomic counter underflow
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 01:59:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 12:48:35 -0400 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 04:56:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: fyi.. I got a bunch of patches queued up that should fix a few things - quite possibly this one too. I want to push the patches to korg, but in the mix is a fs/stack.c change corresponding ecryptfs fix that should go to Linus's tree. The rest of the patches depend on this change. How do you want me to do this? I guess I'll just send all of them to lkml, and say which ones should go where in the 00/xx mail. Let's do that as a starting point. Alright, I'll try to spam the lists later today. Perhaps we can fast-track the ecryptfs fix into mainline if it fixes something there. Not necessary, they aren't bugfixes for fsstack/ecryptfs. I don't want to kep the unionfs tree hanging around forever. We need to work out whether we want to merge it. Agreed. Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. - Albert Einstein - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
