Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Well, since there are commands that work on this (push and log at > least), I believe that some operations could succeed. I *know* that > remote cloning was impossible, and it *looked* like pulling too was > during my attempts to fix the problem before understanding its root > cause. It is possible that I cumulated problems though, if at least > two people could pull from it. Ah, I think I recalled something about the episode. I knew the tag was there (gitweb), and I did have some trouble to get it, but I *think* what worked out was: git fetch -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote: Well, since there are commands that work on this (push and log at least), I believe that some operations could succeed. I *know* that remote cloning was impossible, and it *looked* like pulling too was during my attempts to fix the problem before understanding its root cause. It is possible that I cumulated problems though, if at least two people could pull from it. Ah, I think I recalled something about the episode. I knew the tag was there (gitweb), and I did have some trouble to get it, but I *think* what worked out was: git fetch repo tag -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 08:02:19PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Err... I managed to do it for thinkpad-acpi's merge tree too, a lot of time > ago. So it was somehow possible to get it through the anonymous git server, > probably through the tag. What I do know is that I usually send head's up > email when I notice something like this, and I find it strange that you > didn't get one from me at that time... but I may have forgotten to send it > at that time. Well, since there are commands that work on this (push and log at least), I believe that some operations could succeed. I *know* that remote cloning was impossible, and it *looked* like pulling too was during my attempts to fix the problem before understanding its root cause. It is possible that I cumulated problems though, if at least two people could pull from it. Cheers, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:34:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > do you insist on hearing the truth ("Sorry, I forgot to push."), or can
> > > > I tell you "I just wanted to see whether anyone notices." instead? ;-)
> > >
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > I think we should intentionally do this test once in a while. Two days
> > > ago I was informed that 2.6.20.21 (the latest 2.6.20 I pushed 3 months
> > > ago) was not clonable nor pullable due to a problem with the HEAD
> > > pointing to latest tag instead of latest commit. Since the error was
> > > also present in my local tree, I'm certain that it remained there
> > > unnoticed for 3 months !
> >
> > According to git [1] Ralf merged 2.6.20.21 on 2007-10-18 into the 2.6.20
> > branch of his mips tree, so it must have been somehow possible...
>
> Maybe he did this locally (Linus showed me that local FS cloning disables
> a lot of tests). Or maybe it could work for some pulls :-/ Definitely a
> weird issue anyway!
Err... I managed to do it for thinkpad-acpi's merge tree too, a lot of time
ago. So it was somehow possible to get it through the anonymous git server,
probably through the tag. What I do know is that I usually send head's up
email when I notice something like this, and I find it strange that you
didn't get one from me at that time... but I may have forgotten to send it
at that time.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:34:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > do you insist on hearing the truth ("Sorry, I forgot to push."), or can
> > > I tell you "I just wanted to see whether anyone notices." instead? ;-)
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > I think we should intentionally do this test once in a while. Two days
> > ago I was informed that 2.6.20.21 (the latest 2.6.20 I pushed 3 months
> > ago) was not clonable nor pullable due to a problem with the HEAD
> > pointing to latest tag instead of latest commit. Since the error was
> > also present in my local tree, I'm certain that it remained there
> > unnoticed for 3 months !
>
> According to git [1] Ralf merged 2.6.20.21 on 2007-10-18 into the 2.6.20
> branch of his mips tree, so it must have been somehow possible...
Maybe he did this locally (Linus showed me that local FS cloning disables
a lot of tests). Or maybe it could work for some pulls :-/ Definitely a
weird issue anyway!
Cheers,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:34:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > do you insist on hearing the truth ("Sorry, I forgot to push."), or can
> > I tell you "I just wanted to see whether anyone notices." instead? ;-)
>
> :-)
>
> I think we should intentionally do this test once in a while. Two days
> ago I was informed that 2.6.20.21 (the latest 2.6.20 I pushed 3 months
> ago) was not clonable nor pullable due to a problem with the HEAD
> pointing to latest tag instead of latest commit. Since the error was
> also present in my local tree, I'm certain that it remained there
> unnoticed for 3 months !
According to git [1] Ralf merged 2.6.20.21 on 2007-10-18 into the 2.6.20
branch of his mips tree, so it must have been somehow possible...
> Cheers,
> Willy
cu
Adrian
[1] http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=shortlog;h=linux-2.6.20-stable
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
Hi Adrian,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:34:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> do you insist on hearing the truth ("Sorry, I forgot to push."), or can
> I tell you "I just wanted to see whether anyone notices." instead? ;-)
:-)
I think we should intentionally do this test once in a while. Two days
ago I was informed that 2.6.20.21 (the latest 2.6.20 I pushed 3 months
ago) was not clonable nor pullable due to a problem with the HEAD
pointing to latest tag instead of latest commit. Since the error was
also present in my local tree, I'm certain that it remained there
unnoticed for 3 months !
Cheers,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:04:17PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > RSS feed of the git tree:
> > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=rss
> > Changes since 2.6.16.57:
> > Adrian Bunk (3):
> > ipv4/arp.c:arp_process(): remove bogus #ifdef mess
> > Linux 2.6.16.58-rc1
> > Linux 2.6.16.58
>
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Jiri,
> I don't seem to see v2.6.16.58 tag in your git repository -- the HEAD
> (a8d648b74) is tagged v2.6.16.58-rc1. Is that intended?
do you insist on hearing the truth ("Sorry, I forgot to push."), or can
I tell you "I just wanted to see whether anyone notices." instead? ;-)
> Jiri Kosina
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
Hi Adrian, On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:34:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: do you insist on hearing the truth (Sorry, I forgot to push.), or can I tell you I just wanted to see whether anyone notices. instead? ;-) :-) I think we should intentionally do this test once in a while. Two days ago I was informed that 2.6.20.21 (the latest 2.6.20 I pushed 3 months ago) was not clonable nor pullable due to a problem with the HEAD pointing to latest tag instead of latest commit. Since the error was also present in my local tree, I'm certain that it remained there unnoticed for 3 months ! Cheers, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:04:17PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: RSS feed of the git tree: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=rss Changes since 2.6.16.57: Adrian Bunk (3): ipv4/arp.c:arp_process(): remove bogus #ifdef mess Linux 2.6.16.58-rc1 Linux 2.6.16.58 Hi Adrian, Hi Jiri, I don't seem to see v2.6.16.58 tag in your git repository -- the HEAD (a8d648b74) is tagged v2.6.16.58-rc1. Is that intended? do you insist on hearing the truth (Sorry, I forgot to push.), or can I tell you I just wanted to see whether anyone notices. instead? ;-) Jiri Kosina cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Adrian, On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:34:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: do you insist on hearing the truth (Sorry, I forgot to push.), or can I tell you I just wanted to see whether anyone notices. instead? ;-) :-) I think we should intentionally do this test once in a while. Two days ago I was informed that 2.6.20.21 (the latest 2.6.20 I pushed 3 months ago) was not clonable nor pullable due to a problem with the HEAD pointing to latest tag instead of latest commit. Since the error was also present in my local tree, I'm certain that it remained there unnoticed for 3 months ! According to git [1] Ralf merged 2.6.20.21 on 2007-10-18 into the 2.6.20 branch of his mips tree, so it must have been somehow possible... Cheers, Willy cu Adrian [1] http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=shortlog;h=linux-2.6.20-stable -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. Only a promise, Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 08:02:19PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: Err... I managed to do it for thinkpad-acpi's merge tree too, a lot of time ago. So it was somehow possible to get it through the anonymous git server, probably through the tag. What I do know is that I usually send head's up email when I notice something like this, and I find it strange that you didn't get one from me at that time... but I may have forgotten to send it at that time. Well, since there are commands that work on this (push and log at least), I believe that some operations could succeed. I *know* that remote cloning was impossible, and it *looked* like pulling too was during my attempts to fix the problem before understanding its root cause. It is possible that I cumulated problems though, if at least two people could pull from it. Cheers, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Adrian, On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:34:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: do you insist on hearing the truth (Sorry, I forgot to push.), or can I tell you I just wanted to see whether anyone notices. instead? ;-) :-) I think we should intentionally do this test once in a while. Two days ago I was informed that 2.6.20.21 (the latest 2.6.20 I pushed 3 months ago) was not clonable nor pullable due to a problem with the HEAD pointing to latest tag instead of latest commit. Since the error was also present in my local tree, I'm certain that it remained there unnoticed for 3 months ! According to git [1] Ralf merged 2.6.20.21 on 2007-10-18 into the 2.6.20 branch of his mips tree, so it must have been somehow possible... Maybe he did this locally (Linus showed me that local FS cloning disables a lot of tests). Or maybe it could work for some pulls :-/ Definitely a weird issue anyway! Cheers, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:12:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:34:16PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: do you insist on hearing the truth (Sorry, I forgot to push.), or can I tell you I just wanted to see whether anyone notices. instead? ;-) :-) I think we should intentionally do this test once in a while. Two days ago I was informed that 2.6.20.21 (the latest 2.6.20 I pushed 3 months ago) was not clonable nor pullable due to a problem with the HEAD pointing to latest tag instead of latest commit. Since the error was also present in my local tree, I'm certain that it remained there unnoticed for 3 months ! According to git [1] Ralf merged 2.6.20.21 on 2007-10-18 into the 2.6.20 branch of his mips tree, so it must have been somehow possible... Maybe he did this locally (Linus showed me that local FS cloning disables a lot of tests). Or maybe it could work for some pulls :-/ Definitely a weird issue anyway! Err... I managed to do it for thinkpad-acpi's merge tree too, a lot of time ago. So it was somehow possible to get it through the anonymous git server, probably through the tag. What I do know is that I usually send head's up email when I notice something like this, and I find it strange that you didn't get one from me at that time... but I may have forgotten to send it at that time. -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
Hi, On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:04:17PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > RSS feed of the git tree: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=rss > > Changes since 2.6.16.57: > > Adrian Bunk (3): > > ipv4/arp.c:arp_process(): remove bogus #ifdef mess > > Linux 2.6.16.58-rc1 > > Linux 2.6.16.58 > > Hi Adrian, > > I don't seem to see v2.6.16.58 tag in your git repository -- the HEAD > (a8d648b74) is tagged v2.6.16.58-rc1. Is that intended? Not replying for Adrian, but it happened several times to me too. What sometimes happens when we push Git updates from home is that we don't push all the refs. Sometimes I forget to update the tags, sometimes the master, etc... Just looked at the git repo itself, it looks like it has not changed since 2008/01/08 :-/ Adrian, maybe your git-push did not succeed ? Regards, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: > RSS feed of the git tree: > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=rss > Changes since 2.6.16.57: > Adrian Bunk (3): > ipv4/arp.c:arp_process(): remove bogus #ifdef mess > Linux 2.6.16.58-rc1 > Linux 2.6.16.58 Hi Adrian, I don't seem to see v2.6.16.58 tag in your git repository -- the HEAD (a8d648b74) is tagged v2.6.16.58-rc1. Is that intended? -- Jiri Kosina -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: RSS feed of the git tree: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=rss Changes since 2.6.16.57: Adrian Bunk (3): ipv4/arp.c:arp_process(): remove bogus #ifdef mess Linux 2.6.16.58-rc1 Linux 2.6.16.58 Hi Adrian, I don't seem to see v2.6.16.58 tag in your git repository -- the HEAD (a8d648b74) is tagged v2.6.16.58-rc1. Is that intended? -- Jiri Kosina -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Linux 2.6.16.58
Hi, On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:04:17PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: RSS feed of the git tree: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git;a=rss Changes since 2.6.16.57: Adrian Bunk (3): ipv4/arp.c:arp_process(): remove bogus #ifdef mess Linux 2.6.16.58-rc1 Linux 2.6.16.58 Hi Adrian, I don't seem to see v2.6.16.58 tag in your git repository -- the HEAD (a8d648b74) is tagged v2.6.16.58-rc1. Is that intended? Not replying for Adrian, but it happened several times to me too. What sometimes happens when we push Git updates from home is that we don't push all the refs. Sometimes I forget to update the tags, sometimes the master, etc... Just looked at the git repo itself, it looks like it has not changed since 2008/01/08 :-/ Adrian, maybe your git-push did not succeed ? Regards, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
