Re: RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:08:55 +0100 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - History has shown that often the dependency on EXPERIMENTAL is not > removed when the code has proven usable. Guilty as charged. Feel free to kill any references to experimental for sdhci. (I also support the general sentiment) Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman Linux kernel, MMC maintainerhttp://www.kernel.org PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:08:55 +0100 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - History has shown that often the dependency on EXPERIMENTAL is not removed when the code has proven usable. Guilty as charged. Feel free to kill any references to experimental for sdhci. (I also support the general sentiment) Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman Linux kernel, MMC maintainerhttp://www.kernel.org PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
Adrian Bunk wrote: > I'm about to send a patch that removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all > dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless. FWIW, I agree. [...] > As an example, is our NFSv4 support really still in an > "alpha-test phase" [1], or is it already ready for being used? [...] > [1] quoted from the CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL help text I don't know about NFSv4 in particular, but I think we have the whole palette, from "alpha" software which is basically ready for production, to buggy incomplete software which is heavily in production and trains users to lower their expectations. -- Stefan Richter -=-=-=== =-== = http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: RFC: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
Adrian Bunk wrote: I'm about to send a patch that removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless. FWIW, I agree. [...] As an example, is our NFSv4 support really still in an alpha-test phase [1], or is it already ready for being used? [...] [1] quoted from the CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL help text I don't know about NFSv4 in particular, but I think we have the whole palette, from alpha software which is basically ready for production, to buggy incomplete software which is heavily in production and trains users to lower their expectations. -- Stefan Richter -=-=-=== =-== = http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
