Re: i8042 lockdep false positive.
On 4/13/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 4/13/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false > > positive. Didn't we add something to the code so that lockdep would > > ignore what this was doing ? Did we regress? > > > > For some reasn lockdep annotations cease to work when you reload > psmouse module. I did not have time to look further. In the case reported, psmouse was non-modular. OK, I was not precise. Every time we destroy and re-create passthrough port lockdep starts bitching. For some reason annotation works only once. I am more quirious why synaptics could not simply reconnect upon resume and went into full-blown cleanup/find driver/connect cycle... -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: i8042 lockdep false positive.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:18:32PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 4/13/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false > > positive. Didn't we add something to the code so that lockdep would > > ignore what this was doing ? Did we regress? > > > > For some reasn lockdep annotations cease to work when you reload > psmouse module. I did not have time to look further. In the case reported, psmouse was non-modular. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: i8042 lockdep false positive.
Hi Dave, On 4/13/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just had a user file the report below, which iirc, was deemed a false positive. Didn't we add something to the code so that lockdep would ignore what this was doing ? Did we regress? For some reasn lockdep annotations cease to work when you reload psmouse module. I did not have time to look further. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/