Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4 (net/rds/ib)

[Randy Dunlap]

On 10/3/19 10:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20191003:
> 

on i386:

../net/rds/ib.c: In function ‘rds_ib_dev_free’:
../net/rds/ib.c:111:3: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘dma_pool_destroy’; did you mean ‘mempool_destroy’? 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   dma_pool_destroy(rds_ibdev->rid_hdrs_pool);
   ^~~~
   mempool_destroy
../net/rds/ib.c: In function ‘rds_ib_add_one’:
../net/rds/ib.c:187:29: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘dma_pool_create’; did you mean ‘mempool_create’? 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  rds_ibdev->rid_hdrs_pool = dma_pool_create(device->name,
 ^~~
 mempool_create
../net/rds/ib.c:187:27: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without 
a cast [-Wint-conversion]
  rds_ibdev->rid_hdrs_pool = dma_pool_create(device->name,
   ^



-- 
~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Guenter Roeck]

On 10/04/2018 04:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi Geert,

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:21:42 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven  
wrote:


On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM Guenter Roeck  wrote:

Time for a status report.

Build results:
 total: 135 pass: 121 fail: 14
Failed builds:
 arm:allmodconfig
 i386:allyesconfig
 i386:allmodconfig
 m68k:defconfig
 m68k:allmodconfig
 m68k:sun3_defconfig
 mips:allmodconfig
 parisc:allmodconfig
 powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig
 s390:defconfig
 s390:allmodconfig
 s390:allnoconfig
 sparc32:allmodconfig
 xtensa:allmodconfig


Most (all?) 32-bit builds are broken due to commit 571ed1fd2390f74e
("SUNRPC: Replace krb5_seq_lock with a lockless scheme"), presumably fixed
by Arnd's "SUNRPC: use cmpxchg64() in gss_seq_send64_fetch_and_inc"
(https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/994909/).


I have added that patch to the nfs tree merge in linux-next today.



Most of the boot failures are hopefully fixed with
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/995254/

Guenter

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Guenter Roeck]

On 10/04/2018 04:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi Geert,

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:21:42 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven  
wrote:


On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM Guenter Roeck  wrote:

Time for a status report.

Build results:
 total: 135 pass: 121 fail: 14
Failed builds:
 arm:allmodconfig
 i386:allyesconfig
 i386:allmodconfig
 m68k:defconfig
 m68k:allmodconfig
 m68k:sun3_defconfig
 mips:allmodconfig
 parisc:allmodconfig
 powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig
 s390:defconfig
 s390:allmodconfig
 s390:allnoconfig
 sparc32:allmodconfig
 xtensa:allmodconfig


Most (all?) 32-bit builds are broken due to commit 571ed1fd2390f74e
("SUNRPC: Replace krb5_seq_lock with a lockless scheme"), presumably fixed
by Arnd's "SUNRPC: use cmpxchg64() in gss_seq_send64_fetch_and_inc"
(https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/994909/).


I have added that patch to the nfs tree merge in linux-next today.



Most of the boot failures are hopefully fixed with
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/995254/

Guenter

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Geert,

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:21:42 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven  
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM Guenter Roeck  wrote:
> > Time for a status report.
> >
> > Build results:
> > total: 135 pass: 121 fail: 14
> > Failed builds:
> > arm:allmodconfig
> > i386:allyesconfig
> > i386:allmodconfig
> > m68k:defconfig
> > m68k:allmodconfig
> > m68k:sun3_defconfig
> > mips:allmodconfig
> > parisc:allmodconfig
> > powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig
> > s390:defconfig
> > s390:allmodconfig
> > s390:allnoconfig
> > sparc32:allmodconfig
> > xtensa:allmodconfig  
> 
> Most (all?) 32-bit builds are broken due to commit 571ed1fd2390f74e
> ("SUNRPC: Replace krb5_seq_lock with a lockless scheme"), presumably fixed
> by Arnd's "SUNRPC: use cmpxchg64() in gss_seq_send64_fetch_and_inc"
> (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/994909/).

I have added that patch to the nfs tree merge in linux-next today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgphfPskzdgVM.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Geert,

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 16:21:42 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven  
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM Guenter Roeck  wrote:
> > Time for a status report.
> >
> > Build results:
> > total: 135 pass: 121 fail: 14
> > Failed builds:
> > arm:allmodconfig
> > i386:allyesconfig
> > i386:allmodconfig
> > m68k:defconfig
> > m68k:allmodconfig
> > m68k:sun3_defconfig
> > mips:allmodconfig
> > parisc:allmodconfig
> > powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig
> > s390:defconfig
> > s390:allmodconfig
> > s390:allnoconfig
> > sparc32:allmodconfig
> > xtensa:allmodconfig  
> 
> Most (all?) 32-bit builds are broken due to commit 571ed1fd2390f74e
> ("SUNRPC: Replace krb5_seq_lock with a lockless scheme"), presumably fixed
> by Arnd's "SUNRPC: use cmpxchg64() in gss_seq_send64_fetch_and_inc"
> (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/994909/).

I have added that patch to the nfs tree merge in linux-next today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgphfPskzdgVM.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM Guenter Roeck  wrote:
> Time for a status report.
>
> Build results:
> total: 135 pass: 121 fail: 14
> Failed builds:
> arm:allmodconfig
> i386:allyesconfig
> i386:allmodconfig
> m68k:defconfig
> m68k:allmodconfig
> m68k:sun3_defconfig
> mips:allmodconfig
> parisc:allmodconfig
> powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig
> s390:defconfig
> s390:allmodconfig
> s390:allnoconfig
> sparc32:allmodconfig
> xtensa:allmodconfig

Most (all?) 32-bit builds are broken due to commit 571ed1fd2390f74e
("SUNRPC: Replace krb5_seq_lock with a lockless scheme"), presumably fixed
by Arnd's "SUNRPC: use cmpxchg64() in gss_seq_send64_fetch_and_inc"
(https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/994909/).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:47 PM Guenter Roeck  wrote:
> Time for a status report.
>
> Build results:
> total: 135 pass: 121 fail: 14
> Failed builds:
> arm:allmodconfig
> i386:allyesconfig
> i386:allmodconfig
> m68k:defconfig
> m68k:allmodconfig
> m68k:sun3_defconfig
> mips:allmodconfig
> parisc:allmodconfig
> powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig
> s390:defconfig
> s390:allmodconfig
> s390:allnoconfig
> sparc32:allmodconfig
> xtensa:allmodconfig

Most (all?) 32-bit builds are broken due to commit 571ed1fd2390f74e
("SUNRPC: Replace krb5_seq_lock with a lockless scheme"), presumably fixed
by Arnd's "SUNRPC: use cmpxchg64() in gss_seq_send64_fetch_and_inc"
(https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/994909/).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 06:34:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20181003:
> 
> The bpf-next tree still had its build failure so I used the version
> from next-20181002.
> 
> The kvm-arm tree gained conflicts against the arm64 tree.
> 
> The tty tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20181003.
> 
> The slave-dma tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20181003.
> 
> The userns tree gained a conflict against the y2038 tree.
> 
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 8120
>  7864 files changed, 365604 insertions(+), 168933 deletions(-)
> 

Time for a status report.

Build results:
total: 135 pass: 121 fail: 14
Failed builds: 
arm:allmodconfig 
i386:allyesconfig 
i386:allmodconfig 
m68k:defconfig 
m68k:allmodconfig 
m68k:sun3_defconfig 
mips:allmodconfig 
parisc:allmodconfig 
powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig 
s390:defconfig 
s390:allmodconfig 
s390:allnoconfig 
sparc32:allmodconfig 
xtensa:allmodconfig 
Qemu test results:
total: 318 pass: 249 fail: 69
Failed tests: 
m68k:q800:m68040:mac_defconfig:initrd 
m68k:q800:m68040:mac_defconfig:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-xhci:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS2]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-xhci:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS2]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-xhci:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kc:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
mipsel:34Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
mipsel:74Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
mipsel:M14Kc:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS2]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
mipsel64:64r6el_defconfig:boston:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:nvme:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:scsi:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:nosmp:usb-xhci:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:nosmp:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:nosmp:nvme:rootfs 
s390:defconfig:initrd 
s390:defconfig:virtio-blk-ccw:rootfs 
s390:defconfig:scsi[virtio-ccw]:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:nvme:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:usb-xhci:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Broadwell:defconfig:smp:ata:rootfs 
i386:q35:IvyBridge:defconfig:smp2:efi32:nvme:rootfs 
i386:q35:Conroe:defconfig:smp4:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Nehalem:defconfig:smp6:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Westmere-IBRS:defconfig:smp:efi32:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Skylake-Server:defconfig:smp2:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
i386:pc:EPYC:defconfig:smp:efi32:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 
i386:q35:EPYC-IBPB:defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS2]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Opteron_G5:defconfig:smp:efi32:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Opteron_G4:defconfig:nosmp:efi32:ata:rootfs 
i386:q35:n270:defconfig:nosmp:ata:rootfs 
i386:q35:pentium3:defconfig:pae:nosmp:nvme:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:Broadwell-noTSX:defconfig:smp:mem256:ata:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:IvyBridge:defconfig:smp2:efi:mem512:nvme:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:Conroe:defconfig:smp4:efi32:mem256:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:Nehalem:defconfig:smp:mem512:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:Westmere-IBRS:defconfig:smp2:efi:mem1G:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 

x86_64:q35:Skylake-Server:defconfig:smp4:efi32:mem2G:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs
x86_64:pc:EPYC:defconfig:smp:mem4G:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:EPYC-IBPB:defconfig:smp2:efi:mem8G:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Guenter Roeck]

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 06:34:49PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20181003:
> 
> The bpf-next tree still had its build failure so I used the version
> from next-20181002.
> 
> The kvm-arm tree gained conflicts against the arm64 tree.
> 
> The tty tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20181003.
> 
> The slave-dma tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20181003.
> 
> The userns tree gained a conflict against the y2038 tree.
> 
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 8120
>  7864 files changed, 365604 insertions(+), 168933 deletions(-)
> 

Time for a status report.

Build results:
total: 135 pass: 121 fail: 14
Failed builds: 
arm:allmodconfig 
i386:allyesconfig 
i386:allmodconfig 
m68k:defconfig 
m68k:allmodconfig 
m68k:sun3_defconfig 
mips:allmodconfig 
parisc:allmodconfig 
powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig 
s390:defconfig 
s390:allmodconfig 
s390:allnoconfig 
sparc32:allmodconfig 
xtensa:allmodconfig 
Qemu test results:
total: 318 pass: 249 fail: 69
Failed tests: 
m68k:q800:m68040:mac_defconfig:initrd 
m68k:q800:m68040:mac_defconfig:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-xhci:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS2]:rootfs 
mips:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-xhci:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS2]:rootfs 
mips64:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-xhci:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kc:malta_defconfig:smp:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
mipsel:34Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
mipsel:74Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
mipsel:M14Kc:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS2]:rootfs 
mipsel:24Kf:malta_defconfig:smp:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
mipsel64:64r6el_defconfig:boston:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:nvme:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:scsi:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:smp:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:nosmp:usb-xhci:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:nosmp:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
parisc:defconfig:nosmp:nvme:rootfs 
s390:defconfig:initrd 
s390:defconfig:virtio-blk-ccw:rootfs 
s390:defconfig:scsi[virtio-ccw]:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:nvme:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:usb-xhci:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:usb-uas-xhci:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
sh:rts7751r2dplus_defconfig:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Broadwell:defconfig:smp:ata:rootfs 
i386:q35:IvyBridge:defconfig:smp2:efi32:nvme:rootfs 
i386:q35:Conroe:defconfig:smp4:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Nehalem:defconfig:smp6:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Westmere-IBRS:defconfig:smp:efi32:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Skylake-Server:defconfig:smp2:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs 
i386:pc:EPYC:defconfig:smp:efi32:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 
i386:q35:EPYC-IBPB:defconfig:smp:scsi[MEGASAS2]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Opteron_G5:defconfig:smp:efi32:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
i386:q35:Opteron_G4:defconfig:nosmp:efi32:ata:rootfs 
i386:q35:n270:defconfig:nosmp:ata:rootfs 
i386:q35:pentium3:defconfig:pae:nosmp:nvme:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:Broadwell-noTSX:defconfig:smp:mem256:ata:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:IvyBridge:defconfig:smp2:efi:mem512:nvme:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:Conroe:defconfig:smp4:efi32:mem256:scsi[DC395]:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:Nehalem:defconfig:smp:mem512:scsi[AM53C974]:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:Westmere-IBRS:defconfig:smp2:efi:mem1G:scsi[53C810]:rootfs 

x86_64:q35:Skylake-Server:defconfig:smp4:efi32:mem2G:scsi[53C895A]:rootfs
x86_64:pc:EPYC:defconfig:smp:mem4G:scsi[FUSION]:rootfs 
x86_64:q35:EPYC-IBPB:defconfig:smp2:efi:mem8G:scsi[MEGASAS]:rootfs 

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:56:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell  
wrote:
>
> There will be no linux-next release on Friday.
> 
> Changes since 20161003:

I forgot to say: Please do *not* add any v4.10 material to your
linux-next included trees until v4.9-rc1 has been released i.e. the
merge window closes.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:56:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell  
wrote:
>
> There will be no linux-next release on Friday.
> 
> Changes since 20161003:

I forgot to say: Please do *not* add any v4.10 material to your
linux-next included trees until v4.9-rc1 has been released i.e. the
merge window closes.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Guenter Roeck]

On 10/05/2013 03:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

Hi all,

Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
master branch of the repository below:

 git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git

A next-20131004 tag is also provided for convenience.

Each merge was tested with x86_664 allyesconfig.  A few new conflicts
and build test failures came up along the way - these have all been
reported.



Auto-build results:
total: 110 pass: 81 skipped: 4 fail: 25

This is worse than with the October 3 tree; reason is that all mips builds now 
fail.
Ralf, any idea what is going on ? Looks like it is caused by a couple of your 
patches.

Please see http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders for details.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 4

[Guenter Roeck]

On 10/05/2013 03:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

Hi all,

Better late than never I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the
master branch of the repository below:

 git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git

A next-20131004 tag is also provided for convenience.

Each merge was tested with x86_664 allyesconfig.  A few new conflicts
and build test failures came up along the way - these have all been
reported.



Auto-build results:
total: 110 pass: 81 skipped: 4 fail: 25

This is worse than with the October 3 tree; reason is that all mips builds now 
fail.
Ralf, any idea what is going on ? Looks like it is caused by a couple of your 
patches.

Please see http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders for details.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/