Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the input tree

2017-03-23 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dmitry,

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:30:49 -0700 Dmitry Torokhov  
wrote:
>
> I think the fix is trivial and if it does not both Stephen to carry it
> on we'll let the other Linus resolve it in his tree when merging. I
> think he prefers to have cross-tree merges only happen when it is
> needed for development, not simply to resolve conflicts.

I have no problem carrying the merge fix.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the input tree

2017-03-23 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 2:27 AM, Linus Walleij  wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell  
> wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>>   a01cd17000a4 ("Input: soc_button_array - use NULL for GPIO connection ID")
>>
>> from the input tree and commit:
>>
>>   c5097538c86a ("Input: soc_button_array - Propagate error from 
>> gpiod_count()")
>>
>> from the gpio tree.
>
> Dmitry, I could pick the commit from the input tree and apply
> Stephen's solution and put the result in the GPIO tree if you think
> it's a good idea.

I think the fix is trivial and if it does not both Stephen to carry it
on we'll let the other Linus resolve it in his tree when merging. I
think he prefers to have cross-tree merges only happen when it is
needed for development, not simply to resolve conflicts.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the input tree

2017-03-23 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell  wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
>
>   drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   a01cd17000a4 ("Input: soc_button_array - use NULL for GPIO connection ID")
>
> from the input tree and commit:
>
>   c5097538c86a ("Input: soc_button_array - Propagate error from 
> gpiod_count()")
>
> from the gpio tree.

Dmitry, I could pick the commit from the input tree and apply
Stephen's solution and put the result in the GPIO tree if you think
it's a good idea.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the input tree

2017-03-20 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 15:03 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/input/misc/soc_button_array.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   a01cd17000a4 ("Input: soc_button_array - use NULL for GPIO
> connection ID")
> 
> from the input tree and commit:
> 
>   c5097538c86a ("Input: soc_button_array - Propagate error from
> gpiod_count()")
> 
> from the gpio tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
> tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly
> complex conflicts.

The fix is correct.
Thank you, Stephen.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko 
Intel Finland Oy