Re: smbfs in 2.6.8 SMP kernel
On Llu, 2005-01-17 at 18:13, Brian Henning wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > If I remember correctly there was some smbfs breakage a few releases back > > - 2.6.8 sounds about right. I'd suggest you try a newer kernel like 2.6.10 > > or 2.6.11-rc1 and see if that works better. > > No luck with smbfs in 2.6.10 with SMP either; however, I discovered the > existence of CIFS (which I previously did not know about), and it > appears to work smoothly in place of smbfs. 2.6.10-ac fixes several problems with the later smbfs code but cifs is probably the better choice - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: smbfs in 2.6.8 SMP kernel
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Brian Henning wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > If I remember correctly there was some smbfs breakage a few releases back - > > 2.6.8 sounds about right. I'd suggest you try a newer kernel like 2.6.10 or > > 2.6.11-rc1 and see if that works better. > > No luck with smbfs in 2.6.10 with SMP either; however, I discovered the > existence of CIFS (which I previously did not know about), and it appears to > work smoothly in place of smbfs. > Perhaps if you could provide some more details on the breakage, that would make it easier for people to help you and track down the bug. Take a look at the REPORTING-BUGS document in the kernel source dir for a sample bugreporting form that will help you get all relevant details posted (in addition to what you already posted). -- Jesper Juhl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: smbfs in 2.6.8 SMP kernel
Jesper Juhl wrote: If I remember correctly there was some smbfs breakage a few releases back - 2.6.8 sounds about right. I'd suggest you try a newer kernel like 2.6.10 or 2.6.11-rc1 and see if that works better. No luck with smbfs in 2.6.10 with SMP either; however, I discovered the existence of CIFS (which I previously did not know about), and it appears to work smoothly in place of smbfs. Thanks for the input, however; I'm sure it's better for me to be running a .10 instead of .8 anyhow. Cheers, ~Brian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
