Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
>The UPX team owns all copyright in all of UPX and in each part of > UPX. Therefore, the UPX team may choose which license(s), and has > chosen two ... > This permits using UPX to pack a non-GPL executable. Stupid question time: isn't this what the LGPL was designed to do? The Library GPL, so people who compiled stuff with gcc and linked it with glibc wouldn't necessarily be gpl-ing their binary by doing so? (Or the leprosy GPL, or whatever Stallman's renamed it this month. The license text hasn't changed...) Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
The UPX team owns all copyright in all of UPX and in each part of UPX. Therefore, the UPX team may choose which license(s), and has chosen two ... This permits using UPX to pack a non-GPL executable. Stupid question time: isn't this what the LGPL was designed to do? The Library GPL, so people who compiled stuff with gcc and linked it with glibc wouldn't necessarily be gpl-ing their binary by doing so? (Or the leprosy GPL, or whatever Stallman's renamed it this month. The license text hasn't changed...) Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
> > Both source (GPLv2) and pre-compiled binary for x86 are available. >^ > That's not true. Read > http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx-license.html The UPX team owns all copyright in all of UPX and in each part of UPX. Therefore, the UPX team may choose which license(s), and has chosen two. One of them is GPLv2. The UPX team understands, and fully intends to abide by, its obligations under GPLv2 when any software that is subject to GPLv2 is contributed to UPX and re-distributed by the UPX team. The other license is detailed in the LICENSE file, but may be summarized as: free to use if unmodified, and if used only to invoke the program, and sublicensable only under the same terms. This permits using UPX to pack a non-GPL executable. Users of UPX (as distributed by the UPX team) may choose whether to use UPX according to GPLv2, or according to the other license. [I am not subscribed to this mailing list, so CC: or mail me if appropriate.] -- John Reiser, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
Both source (GPLv2) and pre-compiled binary for x86 are available. ^ That's not true. Read http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx-license.html The UPX team owns all copyright in all of UPX and in each part of UPX. Therefore, the UPX team may choose which license(s), and has chosen two. One of them is GPLv2. The UPX team understands, and fully intends to abide by, its obligations under GPLv2 when any software that is subject to GPLv2 is contributed to UPX and re-distributed by the UPX team. The other license is detailed in the LICENSE file, but may be summarized as: free to use if unmodified, and if used only to invoke the program, and sublicensable only under the same terms. This permits using UPX to pack a non-GPL executable. Users of UPX (as distributed by the UPX team) may choose whether to use UPX according to GPLv2, or according to the other license. [I am not subscribed to this mailing list, so CC: or mail me if appropriate.] -- John Reiser, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
- Original Message - From: "Frank v Waveren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Adrian Bunk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "John Reiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 12:22 AM Subject: Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels > Seems GPL2 to me. I haven't read all of the rest of the page, but > that'd either be dual licensing stuff, or further restrictions, which > would be in contradiction with the GPL. > Seems to be kind of dual licensing: "The stub which is imbedded in each UPX compressed program is part of UPX and UCL, and contains code that is under our copyright. The terms of the GNU General Public License still apply as compressing a program is a special form of linking with our stub. As a special exception we grant the free usage of UPX for all executables, including commercial programs. See below for details and restrictions." It extends the scope of the license to _linking_ with commercial software. Jens - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:15:13AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Both source (GPLv2) and pre-compiled binary for x86 are available. >^ > That's not true. Read > http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx-license.html >From that page: UPX and the UCL library are free software; you can redistribute them and/or modify them under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. Seems GPL2 to me. I haven't read all of the rest of the page, but that'd either be dual licensing stuff, or further restrictions, which would be in contradiction with the GPL. -- Frank v Waveren Fingerprint: 0EDB 8787 fvw@[var.cx|dse.nl|stack.nl|chello.nl] ICQ#10074100 09B9 6EF5 6425 B855 Public key: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7179 3036 E136 B85D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, John Reiser wrote: > Beta release v1.11 of the UPX executable compressor http://upx.tsx.org > offers new, tighter re-compression of compressed Linux kernels for x86. > Additional space savings of about 15% have been seen using > "upx --best vmlinuz" (example: 617431 ==> 525099, saving 92332 bytes). > Both source (GPLv2) and pre-compiled binary for x86 are available. ^ That's not true. Read http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx-license.html > [I'm not subscribed to this mailing list, so CC: or mail me if appropriate.] cu, Adrian -- A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a "Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble. -- Mahatma Ghandi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, John Reiser wrote: Beta release v1.11 of the UPX executable compressor http://upx.tsx.org offers new, tighter re-compression of compressed Linux kernels for x86. Additional space savings of about 15% have been seen using "upx --best vmlinuz" (example: 617431 == 525099, saving 92332 bytes). Both source (GPLv2) and pre-compiled binary for x86 are available. ^ That's not true. Read http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx-license.html [I'm not subscribed to this mailing list, so CC: or mail me if appropriate.] cu, Adrian -- A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a "Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble. -- Mahatma Ghandi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:15:13AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Both source (GPLv2) and pre-compiled binary for x86 are available. ^ That's not true. Read http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx-license.html From that page: UPX and the UCL library are free software; you can redistribute them and/or modify them under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. Seems GPL2 to me. I haven't read all of the rest of the page, but that'd either be dual licensing stuff, or further restrictions, which would be in contradiction with the GPL. -- Frank v Waveren Fingerprint: 0EDB 8787 fvw@[var.cx|dse.nl|stack.nl|chello.nl] ICQ#10074100 09B9 6EF5 6425 B855 Public key: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7179 3036 E136 B85D - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels
- Original Message - From: "Frank v Waveren" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Adrian Bunk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "John Reiser" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 12:22 AM Subject: Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels Seems GPL2 to me. I haven't read all of the rest of the page, but that'd either be dual licensing stuff, or further restrictions, which would be in contradiction with the GPL. Seems to be kind of dual licensing: "The stub which is imbedded in each UPX compressed program is part of UPX and UCL, and contains code that is under our copyright. The terms of the GNU General Public License still apply as compressing a program is a special form of linking with our stub. As a special exception we grant the free usage of UPX for all executables, including commercial programs. See below for details and restrictions." It extends the scope of the license to _linking_ with commercial software. Jens - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
