Re[2]: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-07 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
Hello Hans,

Monday, February 7, 2005, 9:19:47 PM, you wrote:

> Maciej Soltysiak wrote:

>>)
>>
>>Feb  6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady 
>>SeekComplete Error }
>>Feb  6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError 
>>BadCRC }
>>  
>>
> this means bad hard drive, or at least a bad sector on it.
Well, I have reiser4 on this drive with noncritical data which is rather
not used anyway.
But please note that, the process generating the oops (as long as I am
seeing this right) is something called swapper:

scheduling while atomic: swapper/0x00010001/0

My swap partition is not on hdc, it is on hda, which does not report
bad crc and any other dma related errors, or any for that matter.

The same machine runs on 2.6.10-ac10 + reiser-2.6.10 patch well or
at least it does not trigger these oopses.

Only some still not tracked down problems with terrible swap eating :-(
But that's a different story.

Regards,
Maciej


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re[2]: 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 bad scheduling while atomic + lockup

2005-02-07 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
Hello Hans,

Monday, February 7, 2005, 9:19:47 PM, you wrote:

 Maciej Soltysiak wrote:

)

Feb  6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady 
SeekComplete Error }
Feb  6 17:07:47 dns kernel: hdc: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError 
BadCRC }
  

 this means bad hard drive, or at least a bad sector on it.
Well, I have reiser4 on this drive with noncritical data which is rather
not used anyway.
But please note that, the process generating the oops (as long as I am
seeing this right) is something called swapper:

scheduling while atomic: swapper/0x00010001/0

My swap partition is not on hdc, it is on hda, which does not report
bad crc and any other dma related errors, or any for that matter.

The same machine runs on 2.6.10-ac10 + reiser-2.6.10 patch well or
at least it does not trigger these oopses.

Only some still not tracked down problems with terrible swap eating :-(
But that's a different story.

Regards,
Maciej


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/