Re: Remarks about sigtestsetmask()
Alan Cox wrote: > > > 1. This function is only used in the poorly maintained ftape driver. > >The usage there isn't appriopriate for modern kernels. > > The ftape driver isnt exactly poorly maintained. Its just not integrated into > 2.3/2.4. Ftape 4.0 is still elsewhere This is wrong, since last time I checked the maintainer stepped back from the tast. And I understand reintegration into the mainstream kernel proper maintainance as well. (The two versions are *VERY* different). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Remarks about sigtestsetmask()
> 1. This function is only used in the poorly maintained ftape driver. >The usage there isn't appriopriate for modern kernels. The ftape driver isnt exactly poorly maintained. Its just not integrated into 2.3/2.4. Ftape 4.0 is still elsewhere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Remarks about sigtestsetmask()
1. This function is only used in the poorly maintained ftape driver. The usage there isn't appriopriate for modern kernels. 2. This function acts only on the sig set of the current process, so the first parameter should be just a porinter to current, instead of currgen->sigset. So it should be presumably removed all-together. -- - phone: +49 214 8656 283 - job: STOCK-WORLD Media AG, LEV .de (MY OPPINNIONS ARE MY OWN!) - langs: de_DE.ISO8859-1, en_US, pl_PL.ISO8859-2, last ressort: ru_RU.KOI8-R - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
