Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-09 Thread Justin T. Gibbs

>Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST318275LWRev:
> 0001

I seem to recall this being a very buggy firmware version.  You should
check with Seagate to see if they have something new.  If this is the
firmware I'm thinking of, the driver should perform correctly if you
disable write caching.  You can do this via the SCSI-Select menu for
the controller.

--
Justin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-09 Thread Justin T. Gibbs

Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST318275LWRev:
 0001

I seem to recall this being a very buggy firmware version.  You should
check with Seagate to see if they have something new.  If this is the
firmware I'm thinking of, the driver should perform correctly if you
disable write caching.  You can do this via the SCSI-Select menu for
the controller.

--
Justin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread lists

  Well my aicxxx problems continue:

  I did it again and indeed verified similar error messages as I had
  under stock 2.4.3 and 2.4.3+aic 6.1.8. This time it died during boot itself
  starting with complaints from ssh/xinet et al - then I started seeing the
  scsi errors.  (I believe I had also tried ac26 with similar problems hwhich IIRC 
  is  6.1.5).

  Anyway, it goes around in a loop with stuff like:

  SCB 1 ...
  scsi ... 
  scsi   ... recovery complete ..
  scsi   ... code aweke ..
  scsi   ... aic7xxx_abort returns 8194

  or somwething similar. The aic7xxx_abort returns 8194 i remember exactly the others 
  I'm a bit shaky on. Anyway it seems to loop with the recovery/abort thing.

  What can I do to help track down the problem? 

  Regards,


  Gene/

  

---

I enclose output of ver_linux - I note that it incorrectly reports util-linux
becuase it uses mount --version. On my redhat system mount is 2.10r while util-linux
is 2.10s-11. 


Linux snap 2.4.1-0.1.9 #1 Wed Feb 14 22:15:15 EST 2001 i686 unknown
 
Gnu C  2.96
Gnu make   3.79.1
binutils   2.10.91.0.2
util-linux 2.10r
modutils   2.4.5
e2fsprogs  1.19
reiserfsprogs  3.x.0b
pcmcia-cs  3.1.22
PPP2.4.0
Linux C Library2.2.2
Dynamic linker (ldd)   2.2.2
Procps 2.0.7
Net-tools  1.57
Console-tools  0.3.3
Sh-utils   2.0
Modules Loaded emu10k1 soundcore autofs joydev hid input 3c59x ipchains 
ide-scsi ide-cd cdrom usb-uhci usbcore aic7xxx sd_mod scsi_mod

---


On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 12:11:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> I used 5000ms. I still freeze up with 2.4.3 + 6.1.10.
> 
> ...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread lists


I used 5000ms. I still freeze up with 2.4.3 + 6.1.10.

Unfortunately i could not see any messages and nothing got logged.
This time an fsck allowed me to boot back to 2.4.1.  

The visible symptoms were the same as before (2.4.3 + 6.1.8) but this time I was
unable to flip virtual consoles before the freeze so I dont even
know 100% what is causing it - it boots fine - and the scsi driver 
makes no complaints - it all looks normal. X starts up and I can login. 
it starts ok and windows start popping up -  shortly thereafter it freezes 
- just like before. 

I will try investigate further and see if I can get any more log messages.

Is there any debug boot option or compile flag that will help me find out more 
what is going on?  

/var/log/messages says this about scsi.

Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 
6.1.10
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: 
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: aic7890/91: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: 
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Vendor: YAMAHAModel: CRW8424S  Rev: 1.0d
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Type:   CD-ROM ANSI SCSI 
revision: 02
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST318275LWRev: 0001
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Type:   Direct-Access  ANSI SCSI 
revision: 02
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: (scsi0:A:5): 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 
16bit)
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST318275LWRev: 0001
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Type:   Direct-Access  ANSI SCSI 
revision: 02
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: (scsi0:A:6): 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 
16bit)
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: scsi0:0:5:0: Tagged Queuing enabled.  Depth 253
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: scsi0:0:6:0: Tagged Queuing enabled.  Depth 253


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread Justin T. Gibbs

>NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
>__attribute__ ((NORET_AND format (printf, 1, 2)));
>^
>
>Similar cases, compare include/linux/raid/md_k.h:pers_to_level() in
>2.4.3 and 2.4.3-ac3.

Then gcc is not honoring the attribute.  The only way for that
function to not return with a value is in the panic case and that
cannot happen.

--
Justin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread J . A . Magallon


On 04.08 Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> >
> >   In file included from aic7xxx_linux.c:131:
> >   aic7xxx_osm.h: In function `ahc_pci_read_config':
> >   aic7xxx_osm.h:862: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
> 
> This is because panic() is not marked as a "no return" function.  So,

linux/include/linux/kernel.h +38:

# define NORET_TYPE/**/
# define ATTRIB_NORET  __attribute__((noreturn))
# define NORET_AND noreturn,
..
NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
__attribute__ ((NORET_AND format (printf, 1, 2)));
^

Similar cases, compare include/linux/raid/md_k.h:pers_to_level() in
2.4.3 and 2.4.3-ac3.

-- 
J.A. Magallon  #  Let the source
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  #  be with you, Luke... 

Linux werewolf 2.4.3-ac3 #1 SMP Thu Apr 5 00:28:45 CEST 2001 i686

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread Justin T. Gibbs

>   So I started again - installed redhat 7.0.9.
>   took 2.4.4-pre1  and patched it with 
>   linux-aic7xxx-6.1.10-2.4.3.patch
>
>   Patch applied cleanly but when I compile it complains a little:
>
>   In file included from aic7xxx_linux.c:131:
>   aic7xxx_osm.h: In function `ahc_pci_read_config':
>   aic7xxx_osm.h:862: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
>   
>   (for several .c files but always refers to 'ahc_pci_read_config')

This is because panic() is not marked as a "no return" function.  So,
GCC compains that, in the panic() case, we don't return a value from
this particular function.  Since we will never return in that case,
it is, at least in the aic7xxx driver, a harmless warning.

--
Justin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread lists

   I had tried 6.1.8 + 2.4.3 and had problems which included messages like 
   'aic7xxx_abort returns 8194' and machine froze up shortly after X started.
   This on redhat 7.0. Sorry but since I was unable to even boot back the
   prev kernel (2.4.0) I cant provide any more detailed information. I have
   been following to see a few other folks have had some issues with scsi as well.

   I have 2 lvd scsi disks and one ide, AH 2940U2 - top of lilo included below -
   and bios boot order is scsi first.

   So I started again - installed redhat 7.0.9.
   took 2.4.4-pre1  and patched it with 
   linux-aic7xxx-6.1.10-2.4.3.patch

   Patch applied cleanly but when I compile it complains a little:

   In file included from aic7xxx_linux.c:131:
   aic7xxx_osm.h: In function `ahc_pci_read_config':
   aic7xxx_osm.h:862: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
   
   (for several .c files but always refers to 'ahc_pci_read_config')

   In file included from ... include/linux/raid/md.h:50,
   from init/main.c:24: ..include/linux/raid/md_k.h: In function `pers_to_level':
   raid/md_k.h:39: warning: control reaches end of non-void function

   Do I need to be concerned here?  I dont whether the presumed missing return is
   a bad thing or not. 

   I have not yet tried to boot this kernel.

   Also


# lilo.conf
boot=/dev/sda
disk=/dev/sda
 bios=0x80
disk=/dev/sdb
 bios=0x81
disk=/dev/hda
 bios=0x82
map=/boot/map
install=/boot/boot.b
prompt
timeout=50
message=/boot/message
lba32
default=linux

...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread lists

   I had tried 6.1.8 + 2.4.3 and had problems which included messages like 
   'aic7xxx_abort returns 8194' and machine froze up shortly after X started.
   This on redhat 7.0. Sorry but since I was unable to even boot back the
   prev kernel (2.4.0) I cant provide any more detailed information. I have
   been following to see a few other folks have had some issues with scsi as well.

   I have 2 lvd scsi disks and one ide, AH 2940U2 - top of lilo included below -
   and bios boot order is scsi first.

   So I started again - installed redhat 7.0.9.
   took 2.4.4-pre1  and patched it with 
   linux-aic7xxx-6.1.10-2.4.3.patch

   Patch applied cleanly but when I compile it complains a little:

   In file included from aic7xxx_linux.c:131:
   aic7xxx_osm.h: In function `ahc_pci_read_config':
   aic7xxx_osm.h:862: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
   
   (for several .c files but always refers to 'ahc_pci_read_config')

   In file included from ... include/linux/raid/md.h:50,
   from init/main.c:24: ..include/linux/raid/md_k.h: In function `pers_to_level':
   raid/md_k.h:39: warning: control reaches end of non-void function

   Do I need to be concerned here?  I dont whether the presumed missing return is
   a bad thing or not. 

   I have not yet tried to boot this kernel.

   Also


# lilo.conf
boot=/dev/sda
disk=/dev/sda
 bios=0x80
disk=/dev/sdb
 bios=0x81
disk=/dev/hda
 bios=0x82
map=/boot/map
install=/boot/boot.b
prompt
timeout=50
message=/boot/message
lba32
default=linux

...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread Justin T. Gibbs

   So I started again - installed redhat 7.0.9.
   took 2.4.4-pre1  and patched it with 
   linux-aic7xxx-6.1.10-2.4.3.patch

   Patch applied cleanly but when I compile it complains a little:

   In file included from aic7xxx_linux.c:131:
   aic7xxx_osm.h: In function `ahc_pci_read_config':
   aic7xxx_osm.h:862: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
   
   (for several .c files but always refers to 'ahc_pci_read_config')

This is because panic() is not marked as a "no return" function.  So,
GCC compains that, in the panic() case, we don't return a value from
this particular function.  Since we will never return in that case,
it is, at least in the aic7xxx driver, a harmless warning.

--
Justin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread J . A . Magallon


On 04.08 Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
 
In file included from aic7xxx_linux.c:131:
aic7xxx_osm.h: In function `ahc_pci_read_config':
aic7xxx_osm.h:862: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
 
 This is because panic() is not marked as a "no return" function.  So,

linux/include/linux/kernel.h +38:

# define NORET_TYPE/**/
# define ATTRIB_NORET  __attribute__((noreturn))
# define NORET_AND noreturn,
..
NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
__attribute__ ((NORET_AND format (printf, 1, 2)));
^

Similar cases, compare include/linux/raid/md_k.h:pers_to_level() in
2.4.3 and 2.4.3-ac3.

-- 
J.A. Magallon  #  Let the source
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  #  be with you, Luke... 

Linux werewolf 2.4.3-ac3 #1 SMP Thu Apr 5 00:28:45 CEST 2001 i686

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread Justin T. Gibbs

NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
__attribute__ ((NORET_AND format (printf, 1, 2)));
^

Similar cases, compare include/linux/raid/md_k.h:pers_to_level() in
2.4.3 and 2.4.3-ac3.

Then gcc is not honoring the attribute.  The only way for that
function to not return with a value is in the panic case and that
cannot happen.

--
Justin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread lists


I used 5000ms. I still freeze up with 2.4.3 + 6.1.10.

Unfortunately i could not see any messages and nothing got logged.
This time an fsck allowed me to boot back to 2.4.1.  

The visible symptoms were the same as before (2.4.3 + 6.1.8) but this time I was
unable to flip virtual consoles before the freeze so I dont even
know 100% what is causing it - it boots fine - and the scsi driver 
makes no complaints - it all looks normal. X starts up and I can login. 
it starts ok and windows start popping up -  shortly thereafter it freezes 
- just like before. 

I will try investigate further and see if I can get any more log messages.

Is there any debug boot option or compile flag that will help me find out more 
what is going on?  

/var/log/messages says this about scsi.

Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 
6.1.10
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: Adaptec 2940 Ultra2 SCSI adapter
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: aic7890/91: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/255 SCBs
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: 
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Vendor: YAMAHAModel: CRW8424S  Rev: 1.0d
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Type:   CD-ROM ANSI SCSI 
revision: 02
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST318275LWRev: 0001
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Type:   Direct-Access  ANSI SCSI 
revision: 02
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: (scsi0:A:5): 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 
16bit)
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Vendor: SEAGATE   Model: ST318275LWRev: 0001
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel:   Type:   Direct-Access  ANSI SCSI 
revision: 02
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: (scsi0:A:6): 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 
16bit)
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: scsi0:0:5:0: Tagged Queuing enabled.  Depth 253
Apr  7 19:56:13 snap kernel: scsi0:0:6:0: Tagged Queuing enabled.  Depth 253


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

2001-04-07 Thread lists

  Well my aicxxx problems continue:

  I did it again and indeed verified similar error messages as I had
  under stock 2.4.3 and 2.4.3+aic 6.1.8. This time it died during boot itself
  starting with complaints from ssh/xinet et al - then I started seeing the
  scsi errors.  (I believe I had also tried ac26 with similar problems hwhich IIRC 
  is  6.1.5).

  Anyway, it goes around in a loop with stuff like:

  SCB 1 ...
  scsi ... 
  scsi   ... recovery complete ..
  scsi   ... code aweke ..
  scsi   ... aic7xxx_abort returns 8194

  or somwething similar. The aic7xxx_abort returns 8194 i remember exactly the others 
  I'm a bit shaky on. Anyway it seems to loop with the recovery/abort thing.

  What can I do to help track down the problem? 

  Regards,


  Gene/

  

---

I enclose output of ver_linux - I note that it incorrectly reports util-linux
becuase it uses mount --version. On my redhat system mount is 2.10r while util-linux
is 2.10s-11. 


Linux snap 2.4.1-0.1.9 #1 Wed Feb 14 22:15:15 EST 2001 i686 unknown
 
Gnu C  2.96
Gnu make   3.79.1
binutils   2.10.91.0.2
util-linux 2.10r
modutils   2.4.5
e2fsprogs  1.19
reiserfsprogs  3.x.0b
pcmcia-cs  3.1.22
PPP2.4.0
Linux C Library2.2.2
Dynamic linker (ldd)   2.2.2
Procps 2.0.7
Net-tools  1.57
Console-tools  0.3.3
Sh-utils   2.0
Modules Loaded emu10k1 soundcore autofs joydev hid input 3c59x ipchains 
ide-scsi ide-cd cdrom usb-uhci usbcore aic7xxx sd_mod scsi_mod

---


On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 12:11:32AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I used 5000ms. I still freeze up with 2.4.3 + 6.1.10.
 
 ...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/