Re: kernel-doc: what is the purpose of ""?
On Jan 6 2007 10:00, Randy Dunlap wrote: >On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:44:39 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> according to the kernel-doc HOWTO, the following should be >> "highlighted" in some way if found in the extractable documentation of >> your source file: >> >> '_name' - name of a structure (up to two words including 'struct') >> >> but examples of that, at least in the HTML, are simply printed in >> regular font prefixed with '&' -- i don't see that any "highlighting" >> is being done. > >The struct name is highlighted in 'man' output mode. >Not done in text or html output modes. is quite ambiguous when it comes near C code. So far, I have only used e.g. %NULL (%CONSTANT) since % is not an unary operator in C. On the other side, no marking up of any "struct". -`J' -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: kernel-doc: what is the purpose of ""?
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:44:39 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > according to the kernel-doc HOWTO, the following should be > "highlighted" in some way if found in the extractable documentation of > your source file: > > '_name' - name of a structure (up to two words including 'struct') > > but examples of that, at least in the HTML, are simply printed in > regular font prefixed with '&' -- i don't see that any "highlighting" > is being done. The struct name is highlighted in 'man' output mode. Not done in text or html output modes. > the intermediate XML contains simply "struct", which certainly > doesn't suggest any special processing or highlighting. > > am i missing something? --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
kernel-doc: what is the purpose of ""?
according to the kernel-doc HOWTO, the following should be "highlighted" in some way if found in the extractable documentation of your source file: '_name' - name of a structure (up to two words including 'struct') but examples of that, at least in the HTML, are simply printed in regular font prefixed with '&' -- i don't see that any "highlighting" is being done. the intermediate XML contains simply "struct", which certainly doesn't suggest any special processing or highlighting. am i missing something? rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
kernel-doc: what is the purpose of struct?
according to the kernel-doc HOWTO, the following should be highlighted in some way if found in the extractable documentation of your source file: 'struct_name' - name of a structure (up to two words including 'struct') but examples of that, at least in the HTML, are simply printed in regular font prefixed with '' -- i don't see that any highlighting is being done. the intermediate XML contains simply amp;struct, which certainly doesn't suggest any special processing or highlighting. am i missing something? rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: kernel-doc: what is the purpose of struct?
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:44:39 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote: according to the kernel-doc HOWTO, the following should be highlighted in some way if found in the extractable documentation of your source file: 'struct_name' - name of a structure (up to two words including 'struct') but examples of that, at least in the HTML, are simply printed in regular font prefixed with '' -- i don't see that any highlighting is being done. The struct name is highlighted in 'man' output mode. Not done in text or html output modes. the intermediate XML contains simply amp;struct, which certainly doesn't suggest any special processing or highlighting. am i missing something? --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: kernel-doc: what is the purpose of struct?
On Jan 6 2007 10:00, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:44:39 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote: according to the kernel-doc HOWTO, the following should be highlighted in some way if found in the extractable documentation of your source file: 'struct_name' - name of a structure (up to two words including 'struct') but examples of that, at least in the HTML, are simply printed in regular font prefixed with '' -- i don't see that any highlighting is being done. The struct name is highlighted in 'man' output mode. Not done in text or html output modes. something is quite ambiguous when it comes near C code. So far, I have only used e.g. %NULL (%CONSTANT) since % is not an unary operator in C. On the other side, no marking up of any struct. -`J' -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
