Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 16 (AD9467 & ADI_AXI_ADC)
On 3/17/21 1:16 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> On 3/15/21 9:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week. >>> >>> Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1, >>> so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug. >>> >>> News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag >>> v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please >>> consider rebasing it onto v5.12-rc2. Also, please check any branches >>> merged into your branch. >>> >>> Changes since 20210315: >> >> >> on i386 or x86_64: >> >> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ADI_AXI_ADC >> Depends on [n]: IIO [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && OF [=n] >> Selected by [y]: >> - AD9467 [=y] && IIO [=y] && SPI [=y] >> >> >> AD9467 should not select ADI_AXI_ADC when OF is not enabled, >> so possibly AD9467 should depend on OF. > > Hmm, this becomes a bit complicated. > We got here because we needed to add a depends on HAS_IOMEM for the > ADI_AXI_ADC (due to the s390 arch). > Maybe a better fix would be for AD9467 to depend on ADI_AXI_ADC. > The AD9467 driver can't function without the ADI_AXI_ADC driver. Yes, "depends on" works here. Please go ahead with that change. Thanks. > It is a little early to move this to a "high-speed ADC" subgroup. > >> >> >> Full randconfig file is attached. >> >> >> -- >> ~Randy >> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap -- ~Randy
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 16 (AD9467 & ADI_AXI_ADC)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 3/15/21 9:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week. > > > > Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1, > > so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug. > > > > News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag > > v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please > > consider rebasing it onto v5.12-rc2. Also, please check any branches > > merged into your branch. > > > > Changes since 20210315: > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ADI_AXI_ADC > Depends on [n]: IIO [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && OF [=n] > Selected by [y]: > - AD9467 [=y] && IIO [=y] && SPI [=y] > > > AD9467 should not select ADI_AXI_ADC when OF is not enabled, > so possibly AD9467 should depend on OF. Hmm, this becomes a bit complicated. We got here because we needed to add a depends on HAS_IOMEM for the ADI_AXI_ADC (due to the s390 arch). Maybe a better fix would be for AD9467 to depend on ADI_AXI_ADC. The AD9467 driver can't function without the ADI_AXI_ADC driver. It is a little early to move this to a "high-speed ADC" subgroup. > > > Full randconfig file is attached. > > > -- > ~Randy > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 16 (AD9467 & ADI_AXI_ADC)
On 3/15/21 9:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week. > > Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1, > so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug. > > News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag > v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please > consider rebasing it onto v5.12-rc2. Also, please check any branches > merged into your branch. > > Changes since 20210315: on i386 or x86_64: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ADI_AXI_ADC Depends on [n]: IIO [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && OF [=n] Selected by [y]: - AD9467 [=y] && IIO [=y] && SPI [=y] AD9467 should not select ADI_AXI_ADC when OF is not enabled, so possibly AD9467 should depend on OF. Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy Reported-by: Randy Dunlap config-r8272.gz Description: application/gzip