Hi Jörn, After merging the bcon tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/block/blockconsole.c: In function 'sync_read': drivers/block/blockconsole.c:184:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_idx' bio.bi_idx = 0; ^ drivers/block/blockconsole.c:185:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_size' bio.bi_size = SECTOR_SIZE; ^ drivers/block/blockconsole.c:187:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_sector' bio.bi_sector = ofs >> SECTOR_SHIFT; ^ drivers/block/blockconsole.c: In function 'bcon_erase_segment': drivers/block/blockconsole.c:215:6: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_size' bio->bi_size = PAGE_SIZE; ^ drivers/block/blockconsole.c:218:6: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_idx' bio->bi_idx = 0; ^ drivers/block/blockconsole.c:219:6: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_sector' bio->bi_sector = (bc->write_bytes + i * PAGE_SIZE) >> 9; ^ drivers/block/blockconsole.c: In function 'bcon_writesector': drivers/block/blockconsole.c:338:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_size' bio->bi_size = SECTOR_SIZE; ^ drivers/block/blockconsole.c:343:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_idx' bio->bi_idx = 0; ^ drivers/block/blockconsole.c:344:5: error: 'struct bio' has no member named 'bi_sector' bio->bi_sector = bc->write_bytes >> 9; ^ Caused by changes in the block tree. Thierry Reding mentioned that you didn't think that the bcon tree was linux-next material any more, so I just dropped your tree. If that is incorrect, please let me know and I will reinstate it and fix this merge conflict. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpvlDXdyWcUe.pgp
Description: PGP signature