Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jon,

On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:27:29 -0600 Jonathan Corbet  wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell  wrote:
> 
> > jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
> 
> I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
> close...:)

Yeah, amazing innit! ;-)

> I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that
> life keeps getting in the way.  If it's not a hassle for you, I'd just
> as soon keep it around, things have *got* to clear out one of these
> days...

No worries, consider it preserved :-)
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


pgpMmNMF6WXny.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-25 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
Stephen Rothwell  wrote:

> jc_docs   2 years, 6 months ago

I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
close...:)

I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that
life keeps getting in the way.  If it's not a hassle for you, I'd just
as soon keep it around, things have *got* to clear out one of these
days...

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-25 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:

 jc_docs   2 years, 6 months ago

I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
close...:)

I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that
life keeps getting in the way.  If it's not a hassle for you, I'd just
as soon keep it around, things have *got* to clear out one of these
days...

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-25 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jon,

On Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:27:29 -0600 Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net wrote:

 On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:01:24 +1000
 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
 
  jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
 
 I was afraid it would be the oldest tree on the list, but it's not even
 close...:)

Yeah, amazing innit! ;-)

 I've been meaning to do some stuff there for a bit; the problem is that
 life keeps getting in the way.  If it's not a hassle for you, I'd just
 as soon keep it around, things have *got* to clear out one of these
 days...

No worries, consider it preserved :-)
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


pgpMmNMF6WXny.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Konrad,

On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:35:17 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
 wrote:
>
> > ibft1 year, 9 months ago
> 
> Can go away.
> 
> > swiotlb 11 months ago
> 
> Need it. Don't remove it pls.
> 
> > tmem11 months ago
> 
> Can go away.

OK, 2 removed.  Thanks.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


pgpMofHQU3CfO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Konrad,

On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:35:17 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:

  ibft1 year, 9 months ago
 
 Can go away.
 
  swiotlb 11 months ago
 
 Need it. Don't remove it pls.
 
  tmem11 months ago
 
 Can go away.

OK, 2 removed.  Thanks.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


pgpMofHQU3CfO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-20 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:01:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
> so apologies if you get two copies.
> 
> I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
> linux-next.  Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
> commited to in the past 6 months.  Please let me know if the tree is not
> longer in use.  I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
> will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
> needed.

Thank you for the prunning effort.


> ibft  1 year, 9 months ago

Can go away.

> swiotlb   11 months ago

Need it. Don't remove it pls.

> tmem  11 months ago

Can go away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-20 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 05:01:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
 so apologies if you get two copies.
 
 I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
 linux-next.  Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
 commited to in the past 6 months.  Please let me know if the tree is not
 longer in use.  I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
 will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
 needed.

Thank you for the prunning effort.


 ibft  1 year, 9 months ago

Can go away.

 swiotlb   11 months ago

Need it. Don't remove it pls.

 tmem  11 months ago

Can go away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sekhar,

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:44:32 +0530 Sekhar Nori  wrote:
>
> You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are
> now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking
> you to remove it for so long.

Done.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
s...@canb.auug.org.auhttp://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/


pgpORzhZOsCvC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Josh,

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:53:16 -0400 Josh Boyer  wrote:
>
> > 4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
> 
> This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode.  There have only
> been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year,
> and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via his tree.  The arch isn't
> dead, but it's certainly not going to have much in the way of new
> changes.  The overall powerpc tree is probably sufficient for
> linux-next.

Removed.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


pgps75UbSiVVz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> asm-generic 9 months ago

I occasionally use this tree, but in most releases all asm-generic patches tend 
to
go along with whatever patch series needs them, since asm-generic changes are
typically done whenever we add some code to the kernel elsewhere. Please keep 
this
one.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
> so apologies if you get two copies.
>
> I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
> linux-next.  Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
> commited to in the past 6 months.  Please let me know if the tree is not
> longer in use.  I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
> will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
> needed.
>
> TreeLast commit
> ---
> 4xx 1 year, 4 months ago

This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode.  There have only
been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year,
and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via his tree.  The arch isn't
dead, but it's certainly not going to have much in the way of new
changes.  The overall powerpc tree is probably sufficient for
linux-next.

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Sekhar Nori
Hi Stephen,

On Tuesday 17 September 2013 12:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
> so apologies if you get two copies.
> 
> I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
> linux-next.  Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
> commited to in the past 6 months.  Please let me know if the tree is not
> longer in use.  I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
> will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
> needed.
> 
> Tree  Last commit
>   ---

> davinci   2 years, 2 months ago

You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are
now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking
you to remove it for so long.

Regards,
Sekhar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
so apologies if you get two copies.

I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
linux-next.  Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
commited to in the past 6 months.  Please let me know if the tree is not
longer in use.  I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
needed.

TreeLast commit
---
4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
apm 1 year, 5 months ago
asm-generic 9 months ago
audit   1 year, 8 months ago
audit-current   1 year, 8 months ago
configfs1 year, 10 months ago
cpupowerutils   1 year, 7 months ago
cputime 1 year, 9 months ago
davinci 2 years, 2 months ago
dwmw2   6 months ago
dwmw2-iommu 9 months ago
embedded5 years ago
firmware4 years, 4 months ago
fsnotify9 months ago
fw-nohz 10 months ago
hsi 1 year, 8 months ago
hwpoison2 years, 11 months ago
hwspinlock  2 years ago
ibft1 year, 9 months ago
isci1 year, 2 months ago
ixp4xx  7 months ago
jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
kconfig 12 months ago
kgdb7 months ago
logfs   10 months ago
lzo-update  7 months ago
ocfs2   1 year, 1 month ago
omfs1 year, 11 months ago
openrisc6 months ago
osd 9 months ago
parisc  8 months ago
pcmcia  1 year, 7 months ago
pstore  6 months ago
random  7 months ago
sh  7 months ago
sh-current  1 year, 2 months ago
swiotlb 11 months ago
sysctl  1 year, 6 months ago
tmem11 months ago
uclinux 7 months ago
unicore32   10 months ago
uprobes 1 year, 6 months ago
viafb   1 year, 6 months ago

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


pgpJBocrZ7HZw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,

This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
so apologies if you get two copies.

I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
linux-next.  Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
commited to in the past 6 months.  Please let me know if the tree is not
longer in use.  I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
needed.

TreeLast commit
---
4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
apm 1 year, 5 months ago
asm-generic 9 months ago
audit   1 year, 8 months ago
audit-current   1 year, 8 months ago
configfs1 year, 10 months ago
cpupowerutils   1 year, 7 months ago
cputime 1 year, 9 months ago
davinci 2 years, 2 months ago
dwmw2   6 months ago
dwmw2-iommu 9 months ago
embedded5 years ago
firmware4 years, 4 months ago
fsnotify9 months ago
fw-nohz 10 months ago
hsi 1 year, 8 months ago
hwpoison2 years, 11 months ago
hwspinlock  2 years ago
ibft1 year, 9 months ago
isci1 year, 2 months ago
ixp4xx  7 months ago
jc_docs 2 years, 6 months ago
kconfig 12 months ago
kgdb7 months ago
logfs   10 months ago
lzo-update  7 months ago
ocfs2   1 year, 1 month ago
omfs1 year, 11 months ago
openrisc6 months ago
osd 9 months ago
parisc  8 months ago
pcmcia  1 year, 7 months ago
pstore  6 months ago
random  7 months ago
sh  7 months ago
sh-current  1 year, 2 months ago
swiotlb 11 months ago
sysctl  1 year, 6 months ago
tmem11 months ago
uclinux 7 months ago
unicore32   10 months ago
uprobes 1 year, 6 months ago
viafb   1 year, 6 months ago

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


pgpJBocrZ7HZw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Sekhar Nori
Hi Stephen,

On Tuesday 17 September 2013 12:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
 so apologies if you get two copies.
 
 I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
 linux-next.  Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
 commited to in the past 6 months.  Please let me know if the tree is not
 longer in use.  I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
 will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
 needed.
 
 Tree  Last commit
   ---

 davinci   2 years, 2 months ago

You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are
now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking
you to remove it for so long.

Regards,
Sekhar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
 Hi all,

 This message is bcc'd to each of the contacts for the trees listed below,
 so apologies if you get two copies.

 I have been inspired to check the ages of the trees included in
 linux-next.  Below I have listed all the trees that have not been
 commited to in the past 6 months.  Please let me know if the tree is not
 longer in use.  I don't mind keeping these trees in linux-next if they
 will have continued use, but would like to remove any that are no longer
 needed.

 TreeLast commit
 ---
 4xx 1 year, 4 months ago

This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode.  There have only
been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year,
and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via his tree.  The arch isn't
dead, but it's certainly not going to have much in the way of new
changes.  The overall powerpc tree is probably sufficient for
linux-next.

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 17 September 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
 asm-generic 9 months ago

I occasionally use this tree, but in most releases all asm-generic patches tend 
to
go along with whatever patch series needs them, since asm-generic changes are
typically done whenever we add some code to the kernel elsewhere. Please keep 
this
one.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Josh,

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:53:16 -0400 Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:

  4xx 1 year, 4 months ago
 
 This is subarch is basically in maintenance mode.  There have only
 been a handful of patches that have been submitted over the past year,
 and I've ACKed them for Ben to bring in via his tree.  The arch isn't
 dead, but it's certainly not going to have much in the way of new
 changes.  The overall powerpc tree is probably sufficient for
 linux-next.

Removed.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au


pgps75UbSiVVz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: linux-next: old trees

2013-09-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Sekhar,

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:44:32 +0530 Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:

 You can remove the davinci tree from linux-next since the patches are
 now reaching linux-next through ARM-SoC tree. Apologies for not asking
 you to remove it for so long.

Done.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
s...@canb.auug.org.auhttp://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/


pgpORzhZOsCvC.pgp
Description: PGP signature