Re: linux 2.6.23-rc7 - 14 compile warnings
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 10:23:59PM -0400, Gerhard Mack wrote: >On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, WANG Cong wrote: > >> >Summary: >> > CC mm/slub.o >> >mm/slub.c: In function 'kfree': >> >mm/slub.c:2491: warning: passing argument 3 of 'slab_free' discards >> >qualifiers from pointer target type > >static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, >void *x, void *addr) >but .. > >void kfree(const void *x) > >void is not the same as const void. > >> > CC fs/autofs4/symlink.o >> >fs/autofs4/symlink.c: In function 'autofs4_follow_link': >> >fs/autofs4/symlink.c:18: warning: passing argument 2 of 'nd_set_link' >> >discards qualifiers from pointer target type > >Once again ino->u.symlink is a const char and it's dropping the const. > slab_free(s, page, (void *)x, __builtin_return_address(0)); ^ I knew these things. But the explicit casts, such as the above one, mean that we are intended to discard to qualifiers and I think gcc shouldn't warn about this. Regards. WANG Cong - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux 2.6.23-rc7 - 14 compile warnings
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, WANG Cong wrote: > >Summary: > > CC mm/slub.o > >mm/slub.c: In function 'kfree': > >mm/slub.c:2491: warning: passing argument 3 of 'slab_free' discards > >qualifiers from pointer target type static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, void *x, void *addr) but .. void kfree(const void *x) void is not the same as const void. > > CC fs/autofs4/symlink.o > >fs/autofs4/symlink.c: In function 'autofs4_follow_link': > >fs/autofs4/symlink.c:18: warning: passing argument 2 of 'nd_set_link' > >discards qualifiers from pointer target type Once again ino->u.symlink is a const char and it's dropping the const. > > These two warnings are suspicious. Explicit casts are already there, how > they come out? Or gcc bugs? > gcc is perfectly justified when warning about dropping const. Gerhard -- Gerhard Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] <>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: linux 2.6.23-rc7 - 14 compile warnings
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 10:33:56AM +0100, Dave Haywood wrote: >Contents: > ver_linux output > Summary of compile warnings > Full compile log > .config > > > >Linux s1 2.6.23-rc7-g335fb8fc #9 SMP Fri Sep 21 09:31:01 BST 2007 i686 Pentium >III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux > >Gnu C 4.2.0 >Gnu make 3.81 >binutils 2.17 >util-linux 2.12r >mount 2.12r >module-init-tools 3.2.2 >e2fsprogs 1.40.2 >PPP2.4.4 >Linux C Library2.5 >Dynamic linker (ldd) 2.5 >Procps 3.2.7 >Net-tools 1.60 >Kbd1.12 >Sh-utils 6.9 >udev 114 > > > >Summary: > CC mm/slub.o >mm/slub.c: In function 'kfree': >mm/slub.c:2491: warning: passing argument 3 of 'slab_free' discards >qualifiers from pointer target type > > CC fs/autofs4/symlink.o >fs/autofs4/symlink.c: In function 'autofs4_follow_link': >fs/autofs4/symlink.c:18: warning: passing argument 2 of 'nd_set_link' >discards qualifiers from pointer target type These two warnings are suspicious. Explicit casts are already there, how they come out? Or gcc bugs? {snip} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/