Re: lustre: LIBCFS_ALLOC
On Jun 23, 2015, at 2:23 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: > It seems that libcfs_kvzalloc doesn't use any particular threshold or > switchingbetween kzalloc and vmalloc, so can be replaced by ths function > too? If you mean to replace all instances of LIBCFS_ALLOC with libcfs_kvzalloc (and all frees with kvfree) then yes, that could be done I think. Bye, Oleg-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
lustre: LIBCFS_ALLOC
It seems that libcfs_kvzalloc doesn't use any particular threshold or switchingbetween kzalloc and vmalloc, so can be replaced by ths function too? thanks, julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
lustre: LIBCFS_ALLOC
It seems that libcfs_kvzalloc doesn't use any particular threshold or switchingbetween kzalloc and vmalloc, so can be replaced by ths function too? thanks, julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: lustre: LIBCFS_ALLOC
On Jun 23, 2015, at 2:23 AM, Julia Lawall wrote: It seems that libcfs_kvzalloc doesn't use any particular threshold or switchingbetween kzalloc and vmalloc, so can be replaced by ths function too? If you mean to replace all instances of LIBCFS_ALLOC with libcfs_kvzalloc (and all frees with kvfree) then yes, that could be done I think. Bye, Oleg-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
