Re: mutex and rcu list traversal idiosyncrasy
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 05:55:44AM -0600, Håkon Bugge wrote: > Hi Faisal, > > > In commit f27b4746f378 ("i40iw: add connection management code") you have in > i40iw_add_mqh_6(): > > rtnl_lock(); > for_each_netdev_rcu(...) { > [] > } > rtnl_unlock(); > > Shouldn't this read: > rtnl_lock(); > for_each_netdev(...) { > [] > } > rtnl_unlock(); > Yes.
mutex and rcu list traversal idiosyncrasy
Hi Faisal, In commit f27b4746f378 ("i40iw: add connection management code") you have in i40iw_add_mqh_6(): rtnl_lock(); for_each_netdev_rcu(...) { [] } rtnl_unlock(); Shouldn't this read: rtnl_lock(); for_each_netdev(...) { [] } rtnl_unlock(); or rcu_read_lock(); for_each_netdev_rcu(...) { [] } rcu_read_unlock(); ? Thx, Håkon