Re: nvidia fb 0.9.0 (0.9.2?)

2001-02-08 Thread Louis Garcia

Bakonyi Ferenc wrote:

> /me wrote:
> 
>> Louis Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm using XFree86-4.0.1 with the nv driver. You are right, it's ver 
>>> 0.9.2 for the fb.
>>> 
>>> Where can I get the patch? Should I upgrade to XFree86-4.0.2?
>> 
>> Not yet, we have to write that patch first... :) I'll grab an XFree 
>> source soon.
>> Please test other color depths too: 15bpp and 32bpp.
> 
> 
>   Hi!
> 
> I've tried to reproduce your problem, but I failed. Rivafb 0.9.2 on 
> Asus V3000 (Riva 128) with nv driver (from XFree-4.0.1g, Debian 
> Woody) works fine for me. Would you like to try out some other XFree 
> versions too?
> 
> Regards:
>   Ferenc Bakonyi
> 
> 
> 
> 
On a nvidia riva 128 and a stock rh7 with kernel-2.4.1ac4 and above 
which has rivafb-0.9.2 when I startx the desktop is dark. This is in 
16bit and 24bit modes.
I have been told the Riva hardware can be programmed to expect 8 bit or 
6 bit color registers. Rivafb < 0.7.2 used 6 bit color registers, but 
the hw was programmed to 8 bit registers on TNT/TNT2. That was causing 
the so called 'dark console' bug. Rivafb 0.9.2 begins to utilize 8 bits 
on Riva 128, but the XFree86-4.0.1 server uses only 6 bits of them so 
your desktop's brightness is 1/4.

Louis Garcia

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: nvidia fb 0.9.0 (0.9.2?)

2001-02-08 Thread Bakonyi Ferenc


/me wrote:

> Louis Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I'm using XFree86-4.0.1 with the nv driver. You are right, it's ver 
> > 0.9.2 for the fb.
> >
> > Where can I get the patch? Should I upgrade to XFree86-4.0.2?
> 
> Not yet, we have to write that patch first... :) I'll grab an XFree 
> source soon.
> Please test other color depths too: 15bpp and 32bpp.

Hi!

I've tried to reproduce your problem, but I failed. Rivafb 0.9.2 on 
Asus V3000 (Riva 128) with nv driver (from XFree-4.0.1g, Debian 
Woody) works fine for me. Would you like to try out some other XFree 
versions too?

Regards:
Ferenc Bakonyi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: nvidia fb 0.9.0 (0.9.2?)

2001-02-08 Thread Bakonyi Ferenc


/me wrote:

 Louis Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I'm using XFree86-4.0.1 with the nv driver. You are right, it's ver 
  0.9.2 for the fb.
 
  Where can I get the patch? Should I upgrade to XFree86-4.0.2?
 
 Not yet, we have to write that patch first... :) I'll grab an XFree 
 source soon.
 Please test other color depths too: 15bpp and 32bpp.

Hi!

I've tried to reproduce your problem, but I failed. Rivafb 0.9.2 on 
Asus V3000 (Riva 128) with nv driver (from XFree-4.0.1g, Debian 
Woody) works fine for me. Would you like to try out some other XFree 
versions too?

Regards:
Ferenc Bakonyi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: nvidia fb 0.9.0 (0.9.2?)

2001-02-08 Thread Louis Garcia

Bakonyi Ferenc wrote:

 /me wrote:
 
 Louis Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I'm using XFree86-4.0.1 with the nv driver. You are right, it's ver 
 0.9.2 for the fb.
 
 Where can I get the patch? Should I upgrade to XFree86-4.0.2?
 
 Not yet, we have to write that patch first... :) I'll grab an XFree 
 source soon.
 Please test other color depths too: 15bpp and 32bpp.
 
 
   Hi!
 
 I've tried to reproduce your problem, but I failed. Rivafb 0.9.2 on 
 Asus V3000 (Riva 128) with nv driver (from XFree-4.0.1g, Debian 
 Woody) works fine for me. Would you like to try out some other XFree 
 versions too?
 
 Regards:
   Ferenc Bakonyi
 
 
 
 
On a nvidia riva 128 and a stock rh7 with kernel-2.4.1ac4 and above 
which has rivafb-0.9.2 when I startx the desktop is dark. This is in 
16bit and 24bit modes.
I have been told the Riva hardware can be programmed to expect 8 bit or 
6 bit color registers. Rivafb  0.7.2 used 6 bit color registers, but 
the hw was programmed to 8 bit registers on TNT/TNT2. That was causing 
the so called 'dark console' bug. Rivafb 0.9.2 begins to utilize 8 bits 
on Riva 128, but the XFree86-4.0.1 server uses only 6 bits of them so 
your desktop's brightness is 1/4.

Louis Garcia

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: nvidia fb 0.9.0 (0.9.2?)

2001-02-05 Thread Bakonyi Ferenc


Louis Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm using XFree86-4.0.1 with the nv driver. You are right, it's ver 
> 0.9.2 for the fb.
>
> Where can I get the patch? Should I upgrade to XFree86-4.0.2?

Not yet, we have to write that patch first... :) I'll grab an XFree 
source soon.
Please test other color depths too: 15bpp and 32bpp.

Thanks!
Ferenc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: nvidia fb 0.9.0 (0.9.2?)

2001-02-05 Thread Louis Garcia

Bakonyi Ferenc wrote:

> Louis Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> I gave upgraded to 2.4.2pre on my RH7 box and while using riva-128 fb 
>> noticed when in X all the white parts of my desktop are to dark, it is 
>> almost unreadable. I think it might have to do with video timing, is 
>> there a way to fix this?
> 
> 
>   Hi!
> 
> Color handling on Riva 128 in 8bpp mode is a little bit confused.
> The table below summarizes the depth of color registers in 8bpp mode:
> 
> | Riva 128 | Riva TNT and higher
> +--+
> XF86| 6 bit| 8 bit
> +--+
> rivafb < 0.7.2  | 6 bit| 6 bit 'dark console'
> +--+
> rivafb 0.7.3| 6 bit| 8 bit
> +--+
> rivafb 0.9.2| 8 bit| 8 bit
> +--+
> 
> The Riva hardware can be programmed to expect 8 bit or 6 bit color 
> registers. Rivafb < 0.7.2 used 6 bit color registers, but the hw was 
> programmed to 8 bit registers on TNT/TNT2. That was causing the so 
> called 'dark console' bug.
> Rivafb 0.9.2 begins to utilize 8 bits on Riva 128, but your X server 
> uses only 6 bits of them so your desktop's brightness is 1/4. Now 
> Riva 128 has a 'dark X' bug. :)
> The X server should be patched. Which X server/version are you using?
> 
> Regards:
>   Ferenc Bakonyi
> 
> 
> 
> 
I'm using XFree86-4.0.1 with the nv driver. You are right, it's ver 
0.9.2 for the fb.

Where can I get the patch? Should I upgrade to XFree86-4.0.2?

Lou

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: nvidia fb 0.9.0 (0.9.2?)

2001-02-05 Thread Bakonyi Ferenc


Louis Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I gave upgraded to 2.4.2pre on my RH7 box and while using riva-128 fb 
> noticed when in X all the white parts of my desktop are to dark, it is 
> almost unreadable. I think it might have to do with video timing, is 
> there a way to fix this?

Hi!

Color handling on Riva 128 in 8bpp mode is a little bit confused.
The table below summarizes the depth of color registers in 8bpp mode:

| Riva 128 | Riva TNT and higher
+--+
XF86| 6 bit| 8 bit
+--+
rivafb < 0.7.2  | 6 bit| 6 bit 'dark console'
+--+
rivafb 0.7.3| 6 bit| 8 bit
+--+
rivafb 0.9.2| 8 bit| 8 bit
+--+

The Riva hardware can be programmed to expect 8 bit or 6 bit color 
registers. Rivafb < 0.7.2 used 6 bit color registers, but the hw was 
programmed to 8 bit registers on TNT/TNT2. That was causing the so 
called 'dark console' bug.
Rivafb 0.9.2 begins to utilize 8 bits on Riva 128, but your X server 
uses only 6 bits of them so your desktop's brightness is 1/4. Now 
Riva 128 has a 'dark X' bug. :)
The X server should be patched. Which X server/version are you using?

Regards:
Ferenc Bakonyi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: nvidia fb 0.9.0 (0.9.2?)

2001-02-05 Thread Louis Garcia

Bakonyi Ferenc wrote:

 Louis Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I gave upgraded to 2.4.2pre on my RH7 box and while using riva-128 fb 
 noticed when in X all the white parts of my desktop are to dark, it is 
 almost unreadable. I think it might have to do with video timing, is 
 there a way to fix this?
 
 
   Hi!
 
 Color handling on Riva 128 in 8bpp mode is a little bit confused.
 The table below summarizes the depth of color registers in 8bpp mode:
 
 | Riva 128 | Riva TNT and higher
 +--+
 XF86| 6 bit| 8 bit
 +--+
 rivafb  0.7.2  | 6 bit| 6 bit 'dark console'
 +--+
 rivafb 0.7.3| 6 bit| 8 bit
 +--+
 rivafb 0.9.2| 8 bit| 8 bit
 +--+
 
 The Riva hardware can be programmed to expect 8 bit or 6 bit color 
 registers. Rivafb  0.7.2 used 6 bit color registers, but the hw was 
 programmed to 8 bit registers on TNT/TNT2. That was causing the so 
 called 'dark console' bug.
 Rivafb 0.9.2 begins to utilize 8 bits on Riva 128, but your X server 
 uses only 6 bits of them so your desktop's brightness is 1/4. Now 
 Riva 128 has a 'dark X' bug. :)
 The X server should be patched. Which X server/version are you using?
 
 Regards:
   Ferenc Bakonyi
 
 
 
 
I'm using XFree86-4.0.1 with the nv driver. You are right, it's ver 
0.9.2 for the fb.

Where can I get the patch? Should I upgrade to XFree86-4.0.2?

Lou

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: nvidia fb 0.9.0 (0.9.2?)

2001-02-05 Thread Bakonyi Ferenc


Louis Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm using XFree86-4.0.1 with the nv driver. You are right, it's ver 
 0.9.2 for the fb.

 Where can I get the patch? Should I upgrade to XFree86-4.0.2?

Not yet, we have to write that patch first... :) I'll grab an XFree 
source soon.
Please test other color depths too: 15bpp and 32bpp.

Thanks!
Ferenc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/