Re: union mounting file systems... retry #1

2001-06-02 Thread Remi Turk

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 05:11:54PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Q: Is it possible to union mount file systems in linux 2.4 (currently
>using 2.4.5)?
> 
> Q: Should I just go home and start doing my homework?
> 
> Best regards
> 
> roy

AFAIK Al Viro is working on a patch, but it's not in 2.4.5

Happy Hacking.

-- 
Linux 2.4.5-ac6 #1 Fri Jun 1 17:12:42 CEST 2001
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: union mounting file systems... retry #1

2001-06-02 Thread Remi Turk

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 05:11:54PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
 Q: Is it possible to union mount file systems in linux 2.4 (currently
using 2.4.5)?
 
 Q: Should I just go home and start doing my homework?
 
 Best regards
 
 roy

AFAIK Al Viro is working on a patch, but it's not in 2.4.5

Happy Hacking.

-- 
Linux 2.4.5-ac6 #1 Fri Jun 1 17:12:42 CEST 2001
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



union mounting file systems... retry #1

2001-06-01 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

Hi all

After reading "Wonderful World of Linux 2.4" (Penguin Wizard) at
http://www.linuxdevices.com/files/misc/WWOL2.4.html, I found
somthing about union mounting file systems under "Linux internals",
(seventh paragraph).

I've been trying to find out how to do this, but I just fail. Some places
I get the expression that I just have to mount the first file system, and
afterwards, just use the option "-o union" to mount, but still, the
originally mounted file system will disappear as soon as I mount another
on top of it.

Q: Is it possible to union mount file systems in linux 2.4 (currently
   using 2.4.5)?

Q: Should I just go home and start doing my homework?

Best regards

roy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



union mounting file systems... retry #1

2001-06-01 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

Hi all

After reading Wonderful World of Linux 2.4 (Penguin Wizard) at
http://www.linuxdevices.com/files/misc/WWOL2.4.html, I found
somthing about union mounting file systems under Linux internals,
(seventh paragraph).

I've been trying to find out how to do this, but I just fail. Some places
I get the expression that I just have to mount the first file system, and
afterwards, just use the option -o union to mount, but still, the
originally mounted file system will disappear as soon as I mount another
on top of it.

Q: Is it possible to union mount file systems in linux 2.4 (currently
   using 2.4.5)?

Q: Should I just go home and start doing my homework?

Best regards

roy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



RE: union mounting file systems...

2001-05-31 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

well...

I just wondered how to (if possible) union mount two or more filesystems
on a single mount point. The point that I want to bypass a bug/weakness in
RedHat's installer is not really the case. I've tried to search the kernel
mailing list archive, and find it's possible with mount -o union ...
Problem is that I still can't see nothing but the last file system mounted
on the mount point, so what is wrong?

It may be an issue for other forums than lkml, but I really don't think
RedHat is the place to go.

Best regards

roy

On Thu, 31 May 2001, Vibol Hou wrote:

> This sounds more like a RedHat issue than a LKML issue.  Take it up with
> RedHat.
>
> --
> Vibol Hou
> KhmerConnection, http://khmer.cc
> "Stay Connected."
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roy Sigurd
> Karlsbakk
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: union mounting file systems...
>
>
> Hi all
>
> I just read the "Wonderful world of linux (2.4)", where it's said that the
> Linux kernel 2.4 supports so-called union mounted file systems. I recently
> downloaded the RedHat 7.1 distribution and loop-back mounted the CD's to
> be able to install over ftp, but no... RedHat's install script reminds me
> of all the flexibility you can get from an installer delivered from
> Microsoft. After installing the stuff from CD #1, you're _not_ asked where
> CD #2 is supposed to be; you just get loads of error messages on the
> console. So - I can copy all the files from the two CD's - or - union
> mount them (the .iso's) on a common directory.
>
> Does anyone know where I can find a mount program that actually does this?
>
> Please cc: to me, as I'm not on the list
>
> regards
>
> roy
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



union mounting file systems...

2001-05-31 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

Hi all

I just read the "Wonderful world of linux (2.4)", where it's said that the
Linux kernel 2.4 supports so-called union mounted file systems. I recently
downloaded the RedHat 7.1 distribution and loop-back mounted the CD's to
be able to install over ftp, but no... RedHat's install script reminds me
of all the flexibility you can get from an installer delivered from
Microsoft. After installing the stuff from CD #1, you're _not_ asked where
CD #2 is supposed to be; you just get loads of error messages on the
console. So - I can copy all the files from the two CD's - or - union
mount them (the .iso's) on a common directory.

Does anyone know where I can find a mount program that actually does this?

Please cc: to me, as I'm not on the list

regards

roy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



union mounting file systems...

2001-05-31 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

Hi all

I just read the Wonderful world of linux (2.4), where it's said that the
Linux kernel 2.4 supports so-called union mounted file systems. I recently
downloaded the RedHat 7.1 distribution and loop-back mounted the CD's to
be able to install over ftp, but no... RedHat's install script reminds me
of all the flexibility you can get from an installer delivered from
Microsoft. After installing the stuff from CD #1, you're _not_ asked where
CD #2 is supposed to be; you just get loads of error messages on the
console. So - I can copy all the files from the two CD's - or - union
mount them (the .iso's) on a common directory.

Does anyone know where I can find a mount program that actually does this?

Please cc: to me, as I'm not on the list

regards

roy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



RE: union mounting file systems...

2001-05-31 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk

well...

I just wondered how to (if possible) union mount two or more filesystems
on a single mount point. The point that I want to bypass a bug/weakness in
RedHat's installer is not really the case. I've tried to search the kernel
mailing list archive, and find it's possible with mount -o union ...
Problem is that I still can't see nothing but the last file system mounted
on the mount point, so what is wrong?

It may be an issue for other forums than lkml, but I really don't think
RedHat is the place to go.

Best regards

roy

On Thu, 31 May 2001, Vibol Hou wrote:

 This sounds more like a RedHat issue than a LKML issue.  Take it up with
 RedHat.

 --
 Vibol Hou
 KhmerConnection, http://khmer.cc
 Stay Connected.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roy Sigurd
 Karlsbakk
 Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:39 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: union mounting file systems...


 Hi all

 I just read the Wonderful world of linux (2.4), where it's said that the
 Linux kernel 2.4 supports so-called union mounted file systems. I recently
 downloaded the RedHat 7.1 distribution and loop-back mounted the CD's to
 be able to install over ftp, but no... RedHat's install script reminds me
 of all the flexibility you can get from an installer delivered from
 Microsoft. After installing the stuff from CD #1, you're _not_ asked where
 CD #2 is supposed to be; you just get loads of error messages on the
 console. So - I can copy all the files from the two CD's - or - union
 mount them (the .iso's) on a common directory.

 Does anyone know where I can find a mount program that actually does this?

 Please cc: to me, as I'm not on the list

 regards

 roy

 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: union mounting?

2001-04-13 Thread Ingo Oeser

On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:31:46PM -0400, David L. Parsley wrote:
> real pretty.  If you've got union mounting patches for testing, I'd be
> interested. ;-)

/me is interested, too. And yes, I have nearly the same problem ;-)


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-- 
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
 <<<<<<<<<<<< been there and had much fun   >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Re: union mounting?

2001-04-13 Thread Ingo Oeser

On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:31:46PM -0400, David L. Parsley wrote:
 real pretty.  If you've got union mounting patches for testing, I'd be
 interested. ;-)

/me is interested, too. And yes, I have nearly the same problem ;-)


Regards

Ingo Oeser
-- 
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag
  been there and had much fun   
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



union mounting?

2001-04-12 Thread David L. Parsley

Hi Alex,

I'm working on an embedded distro, and it would be nice if I could just
mount 'packages' over the top of one another; each 'package' is a cramfs
filesystem.  I'm currently using a bunch of symlink stuff, but it's not
real pretty.  If you've got union mounting patches for testing, I'd be
interested. ;-)

regards,
David
-- 
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



union mounting?

2001-04-12 Thread David L. Parsley

Hi Alex,

I'm working on an embedded distro, and it would be nice if I could just
mount 'packages' over the top of one another; each 'package' is a cramfs
filesystem.  I'm currently using a bunch of symlink stuff, but it's not
real pretty.  If you've got union mounting patches for testing, I'd be
interested. ;-)

regards,
David
-- 
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/