Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/7] gpio-rockchip driver
I'm forget to send-to include Bartosz, I'll remember in next version ------ jay...@rock-chips.com >Separate gpio driver from pinctrl driver, and support v2 controller. > >Jianqun Xu (7): > pinctrl/rockchip: separate struct rockchip_pin_bank to a head file > pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.h: add pinctrl device to gpio bank struct > gpio: separate gpio driver from pinctrl-rockchip driver > gpio/rockchip: use struct rockchip_gpio_regs for gpio controller > gpio/rockchip: support next version gpio controller > gpio/rockchip: always enable clock for gpio controller > gpio/rockchip: drop irq_gc_lock/irq_gc_unlock for irq set type > > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 8 + > drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c | 758 > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 909 + > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.h | 286 + > 5 files changed, 1072 insertions(+), 890 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-rockchip.c > create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.h > >-- >2.25.1 > > >
Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: rockchip: make driver be tristate module
Dear Walleij and Heiko The patch "[PATCH] pinctrl: rockchip: populate platform device for rockchip gpio" has been remove outof the patches, since we have a new patch to move gpio related codes to a separated driver. So please ignore it for now. thanks very much. ------ jay...@rock-chips.com >On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:18 AM Heiko Stübner wrote: > >> It seems I've reviewed all patches of this series now, but I think >> you might want to resend the series a final time as v3 in a cleaned up >> state (drop patch1 and just post patches 2-5 in a full series) so that >> we don't confuse Linus too much with the reposted patches we currently >> have. > >Yes please send a v3 like that so I can apply it! > >Yours, >Linus Walleij > > >
