Re: [PATCH] v4l: rcar-fcp: Don't force users to check for disabled FCP support

2016-08-18 Thread Niklas Söderlund
On 2016-08-17 16:32:08 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The rcar_fcp_enable() function immediately returns successfully when the
> FCP device pointer is NULL to avoid forcing the users to check the FCP
> device manually before every call. However, the stub version of the
> function used when the FCP driver is disabled returns -ENOSYS
> unconditionally, resulting in a different API contract for the two
> versions of the function.
> 
> As a user that requires FCP support will fail at probe time when calling
> rcar_fcp_get() if the FCP driver is disabled, the stub version of the
> rcar_fcp_enable() function will only be called with a NULL FCP device.
> We can thus return 0 unconditionally to align the behaviour with the
> normal version of the function.
> 
> Reported-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart 

Works on Koelsch with shmobile_defconfig.

Tested-by: Niklas Söderlund 

> ---
>  include/media/rcar-fcp.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/media/rcar-fcp.h b/include/media/rcar-fcp.h
> index 4c7fc77eaf29..8723f05c6321 100644
> --- a/include/media/rcar-fcp.h
> +++ b/include/media/rcar-fcp.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static inline struct rcar_fcp_device *rcar_fcp_get(const 
> struct device_node *np)
>  static inline void rcar_fcp_put(struct rcar_fcp_device *fcp) { }
>  static inline int rcar_fcp_enable(struct rcar_fcp_device *fcp)
>  {
> - return -ENOSYS;
> + return 0;
>  }
>  static inline void rcar_fcp_disable(struct rcar_fcp_device *fcp) { }
>  #endif
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart
> 

-- 
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] v4l: rcar-fcp: Don't force users to check for disabled FCP support

2016-08-17 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Laurent Pinchart
 wrote:
> The rcar_fcp_enable() function immediately returns successfully when the
> FCP device pointer is NULL to avoid forcing the users to check the FCP
> device manually before every call. However, the stub version of the
> function used when the FCP driver is disabled returns -ENOSYS
> unconditionally, resulting in a different API contract for the two
> versions of the function.
>
> As a user that requires FCP support will fail at probe time when calling
> rcar_fcp_get() if the FCP driver is disabled, the stub version of the
> rcar_fcp_enable() function will only be called with a NULL FCP device.
> We can thus return 0 unconditionally to align the behaviour with the
> normal version of the function.
>
> Reported-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart 

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html