Re: [PATCH 00/16] sleep_on removal, second try
Am 26.02.2014 12:01, schrieb Arnd Bergmann: > It's been a while since the first submission of these patches, > but a lot of them have made it into linux-next already, so here > is the stuff that is not merged yet, hopefully addressing all > the comments. > > Geert and Michael: the I was expecting the ataflop and atari_scsi > patches to be merged already, based on earlier discussion. > Can you apply them to the linux-m68k tree, or do you prefer > them to go through the scsi and block maintainers? > > Jens: I did not get any comments for the DAC960 and swim3 patches, > I assume they are good to go in. Please merge. > > Hans and Mauro: As I commented on the old thread, I thought the > four media patches were on their way. I have addressed the one > comment that I missed earlier now, and used Hans' version for > the two patches he changed. Please merge or let me know the status > if you have already put them in some tree, but not yet into linux-next > > Greg or Andrew: The parport subsystem is orphaned unfortunately, > can one of you pick up that patch? > > Davem: The two ATM patches got acks, but I did not hear back from > Karsten regarding the ISDN patches. Can you pick up all six, or > should we wait for comments about the ISDN patches? > Ack on the ISDN stuff (12,13,14,15) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 00/16] sleep_on removal, second try
Hi Michael, Arnd, On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Michael Schmitz wrote: >> It's been a while since the first submission of these patches, >> but a lot of them have made it into linux-next already, so here >> is the stuff that is not merged yet, hopefully addressing all >> the comments. >> >> Geert and Michael: the I was expecting the ataflop and atari_scsi >> patches to be merged already, based on earlier discussion. >> Can you apply them to the linux-m68k tree, or do you prefer >> them to go through the scsi and block maintainers? > > Not sure what we decided to do - I'd prefer to double-check the latest ones > first, but I'd be OK with these to go via m68k. > > Maybe Geert waits for acks from linux-scsi and linux-block? (The rest of my > patches to Atari SCSI still awaits comment there.) I was waiting for a final confirmation. I was under the impression some rework was needed, and seeing Michael's NAK confirms that. I'd be glad to take them through the m68k tree (for 3.15), once they have received testing and Michael's ACK. Or the block resp. SCSI maintainers can take them if they prefer, which apparently already happened for 01/16. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 00/16] sleep_on removal, second try
Arnd, It's been a while since the first submission of these patches, but a lot of them have made it into linux-next already, so here is the stuff that is not merged yet, hopefully addressing all the comments. Geert and Michael: the I was expecting the ataflop and atari_scsi patches to be merged already, based on earlier discussion. Can you apply them to the linux-m68k tree, or do you prefer them to go through the scsi and block maintainers? Not sure what we decided to do - I'd prefer to double-check the latest ones first, but I'd be OK with these to go via m68k. Maybe Geert waits for acks from linux-scsi and linux-block? (The rest of my patches to Atari SCSI still awaits comment there.) Geert? Regards, Michael Jens: I did not get any comments for the DAC960 and swim3 patches, I assume they are good to go in. Please merge. Hans and Mauro: As I commented on the old thread, I thought the four media patches were on their way. I have addressed the one comment that I missed earlier now, and used Hans' version for the two patches he changed. Please merge or let me know the status if you have already put them in some tree, but not yet into linux-next Greg or Andrew: The parport subsystem is orphaned unfortunately, can one of you pick up that patch? Davem: The two ATM patches got acks, but I did not hear back from Karsten regarding the ISDN patches. Can you pick up all six, or should we wait for comments about the ISDN patches? Arnd Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: David S. Miller Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Karsten Keil Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Michael Schmitz Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-atm-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org Arnd Bergmann (16): ataflop: fix sleep_on races scsi: atari_scsi: fix sleep_on race DAC960: remove sleep_on usage swim3: fix interruptible_sleep_on race [media] omap_vout: avoid sleep_on race [media] usbvision: drop unused define USBVISION_SAY_AND_WAIT [media] radio-cadet: avoid interruptible_sleep_on race [media] arv: fix sleep_on race parport: fix interruptible_sleep_on race atm: nicstar: remove interruptible_sleep_on_timeout atm: firestream: fix interruptible_sleep_on race isdn: pcbit: fix interruptible_sleep_on race isdn: hisax/elsa: fix sleep_on race in elsa FSM isdn: divert, hysdn: fix interruptible_sleep_on race isdn: fix multiple sleep_on races sched: remove sleep_on() and friends Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl| 10 -- drivers/atm/firestream.c | 4 +-- drivers/atm/nicstar.c| 13 drivers/block/DAC960.c | 34 ++-- drivers/block/ataflop.c | 16 +- drivers/block/swim3.c| 18 ++- drivers/isdn/divert/divert_procfs.c | 7 +++-- drivers/isdn/hisax/elsa.c| 9 -- drivers/isdn/hisax/elsa_ser.c| 3 +- drivers/isdn/hysdn/hysdn_proclog.c | 7 +++-- drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_common.c | 13 +--- drivers/isdn/pcbit/drv.c | 6 ++-- drivers/media/platform/arv.c | 6 ++-- drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout_vrfb.c | 3 +- drivers/media/radio/radio-cadet.c| 46 drivers/media/usb/usbvision/usbvision.h | 8 - drivers/parport/share.c | 3 +- drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c| 12 ++-- include/linux/wait.h | 11 --- kernel/sched/core.c | 46 20 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 00/16] sleep_on removal, second try
On Wed, Feb 26 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > It's been a while since the first submission of these patches, > but a lot of them have made it into linux-next already, so here > is the stuff that is not merged yet, hopefully addressing all > the comments. > > Geert and Michael: the I was expecting the ataflop and atari_scsi > patches to be merged already, based on earlier discussion. > Can you apply them to the linux-m68k tree, or do you prefer > them to go through the scsi and block maintainers? > > Jens: I did not get any comments for the DAC960 and swim3 patches, > I assume they are good to go in. Please merge. Picked up 1, 3, 4 of the patches. Thanks Arnd. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html