[RESEND PATCH 0/4] mmc_spi: Add support for regulator framework
Hi, resending the patchset as I missed some recipients on the first round. This patchset has the purpose of adding support for the regulator framework to the mmc_spi driver. The first three patches are preparatory cleanups to make the forth one more straightforward. Maybe the fourth patch can be improved, I am open to any suggestions about it. These changes take strong inspiration from the pxamci driver; they have been tested on a Motorola A910, which uses a regulator to powerup the MMC card connected to the SPI bus, a test from a current user of the mmc_spi driver would not hurt just to be sure no regressions have been introduced. Thanks, Antonio Antonio Ospite (4): mmc_spi.c: factor out the check for power capability mmc_spi.c: factor out the SD card shutdown sequence mmc_spi.c: factor out a mmc_spi_setpower() function mmc_spi.c: add support for the regulator framework drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c | 194 +--- 1 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-mmc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/4] mmc_spi: Add support for regulator framework
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:05:43 -0600 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:46:38 +0100 Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it wrote: Hi, this patchset has the purpose of adding support for the regulator framework to the mmc_spi driver. The first three patches are preparatory cleanups to make the fourth one more straightforward. Maybe the fourth patch can be improved, I am open to any suggestions about it. Ping. I forgot to Cc spi-devel-general on this series, should I resend it? Not a bad idea. It doesn't go via my tree since it is an mmc patch, not an spi one, but I don't mind taking a look at the spi bits. Grant you were on Cc from the start so you should have the patches somewhere; please tell me if you don't. I'd avoid resending if not strictly necessary. Regards, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? pgprBDeNkxT5Q.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH 0/4] mmc_spi: Add support for regulator framework
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 10:43:47AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:05:43 -0600 Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:46:38 +0100 Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it wrote: Hi, this patchset has the purpose of adding support for the regulator framework to the mmc_spi driver. The first three patches are preparatory cleanups to make the fourth one more straightforward. Maybe the fourth patch can be improved, I am open to any suggestions about it. Ping. I forgot to Cc spi-devel-general on this series, should I resend it? Not a bad idea. It doesn't go via my tree since it is an mmc patch, not an spi one, but I don't mind taking a look at the spi bits. Grant you were on Cc from the start so you should have the patches somewhere; please tell me if you don't. I'd avoid resending if not strictly necessary. Ah, then I probably scanned it briefly and decided I didn't need to respond to it. Don't worry about reposting. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-mmc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/4] mmc_spi: Add support for regulator framework
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:46:38 +0100 Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it wrote: Hi, this patchset has the purpose of adding support for the regulator framework to the mmc_spi driver. The first three patches are preparatory cleanups to make the fourth one more straightforward. Maybe the fourth patch can be improved, I am open to any suggestions about it. Ping. I forgot to Cc spi-devel-general on this series, should I resend it? These changes take strong inspiration from the pxamci driver; they have been tested on a Motorola A910, which uses a regulator to powerup the MMC card connected to the SPI bus, a test from a current user of the mmc_spi driver would not hurt just to be sure no regressions have been introduced. Thanks, Antonio Antonio Ospite (4): mmc_spi.c: factor out the check for power capability mmc_spi.c: factor out the SD card shutdown sequence mmc_spi.c: factor out a mmc_spi_setpower() function mmc_spi.c: add support for the regulator framework drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c | 194 +--- 1 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? pgpRx06IiCbS1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH 0/4] mmc_spi: Add support for regulator framework
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote: On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:46:38 +0100 Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it wrote: Hi, this patchset has the purpose of adding support for the regulator framework to the mmc_spi driver. The first three patches are preparatory cleanups to make the fourth one more straightforward. Maybe the fourth patch can be improved, I am open to any suggestions about it. Ping. I forgot to Cc spi-devel-general on this series, should I resend it? Not a bad idea. It doesn't go via my tree since it is an mmc patch, not an spi one, but I don't mind taking a look at the spi bits. g. These changes take strong inspiration from the pxamci driver; they have been tested on a Motorola A910, which uses a regulator to powerup the MMC card connected to the SPI bus, a test from a current user of the mmc_spi driver would not hurt just to be sure no regressions have been introduced. Thanks, Antonio Antonio Ospite (4): mmc_spi.c: factor out the check for power capability mmc_spi.c: factor out the SD card shutdown sequence mmc_spi.c: factor out a mmc_spi_setpower() function mmc_spi.c: add support for the regulator framework drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c | 194 +--- 1 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-mmc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH 0/4] mmc_spi: Add support for regulator framework
Hi, this patchset has the purpose of adding support for the regulator framework to the mmc_spi driver. The first three patches are preparatory cleanups to make the forth one more straightforward. Maybe the fourth patch can be improved, I am open to any suggestions about it. These changes take strong inspiration from the pxamci driver; they have been tested on a Motorola A910, which uses a regulator to powerup the MMC card connected to the SPI bus, a test from a current user of the mmc_spi driver would not hurt just to be sure no regressions have been introduced. Thanks, Antonio Antonio Ospite (4): mmc_spi.c: factor out the check for power capability mmc_spi.c: factor out the SD card shutdown sequence mmc_spi.c: factor out a mmc_spi_setpower() function mmc_spi.c: add support for the regulator framework drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c | 194 +--- 1 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-mmc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
