Linux-Networking Digest #463
Linux-Networking Digest #463, Volume #12 Fri, 3 Sep 99 14:13:50 EDT
Contents:
Re: windows to linux tcp/ip not working (Christopher Burrows)
minicom (Frederick Houdmont)
SIOCFIFFLAGS et al (k vranes)
Re: Maintaining 2 Networks (Tony Green)
Re: linux box vs switched hub (David C.)
Re: windows to linux tcp/ip not working (Bernd Zimmermann)
Re: Masqurading and only one NIC
Linux dynamic IP addr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: VPN and IP MASQ ("John Hardin")
Xtraceroute Configuration (James Johnson)
Question on use of ?: in the networking code ... (Ramesh Shankar)
Re: secure ftp directories (Chris Butler)
Re: Setting up Masquerading under RH6.0 (David C.)
Re: All working but root telnet (k vranes)
Re: MRTG Gives funny graphs, and incorrect statistics.. ("Tony Platt")
Re: wu_ftp problem (Chris Butler)
Trouble downloading large files on Netscape (Christian Cabal)
From: Christopher Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: windows to linux tcp/ip not working
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 17:08:01 +
hi,
if i ping myself, it works fine. but, i see no network activity on the hub
lights (am i supposed to?) i'll try compiling the 3c509 driver into the kernel,
but i don't imagine that should make much of a difference, would it? (i am
getting desperate).
one:~ ping 192.168.1.11
PING 192.168.1.11 (192.168.1.11): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.11: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=0.1 ms
--- 192.168.1.11 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.1/0.1/0.2 ms
one:~ ping 192.168.1.12
PING 192.168.1.12 (192.168.1.12): 56 data bytes
--- 192.168.1.12 ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
one:~
- cj
Sagolsem C wrote:
Can you ping to yourself on the linux box? Since you are saying that if you
boot with Win on the linux hardware you can communicate, the possibility of
any hardware and the physical part of the network problem is ruled out. The
problem is definetly with Linux. I think it has nothing to do with routing
also since they are on the same network 192.168.1.0 Hav you tried compiling
the ethernet support not as a module.
Your problem is quite interesting and obscure too. Do let me know the
solution if you get it right . Good luck !
Sagolsem C
Christopher Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
hi,
...
ppp20716 2 (autoclean) [ppp_deflate bsd_comp]
slhc4296 1 (autoclean) [ppp]
serial 18260 2 (autoclean)
3c509 5780 1
one:~
- cj
--
From: Frederick Houdmont [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.alpha,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: minicom
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 13:31:06 GMT
I've made a connection from an offline box through a null modem on an
online box in a network. I use the ascii protocol to upload the file in
the online box (what seems to be going allright) but if i try to download
in ascii it tells me READY but the specified file for download is empty.
The other protocols (xmodem, ymodem,zmodem) don't seem to work?
What is my problem? (Debian!!)
== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==
http://www.searchlinux.com
--
From: k vranes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SIOCFIFFLAGS et al
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 11:39:31 -0400
I'm running redhat 6 with a 3com509 card that has been working stable for
a while. Last night a Netscape froze GNOME so hard that I could only
telnet in from another box and reboot the machine (not even killing the
Netscape or X processes released the screen, which I found odd).
Upon rebooting, networking is now toast. All local networking runs fine,
eth0 comes up without error while running /etc/rc.d/inet.d/network start,
but trying to telnet outside gives an immediate 'Host name lookup
failure.'
although eth0 *seems* to come up, running netstat -nr shows only the lo
interface info. running
ifconfig eth0
gives good info, except the broadcast info is wrong. However, trying to
config that with:
ifconfig eth0 broadcast xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
gives SIOCFIFFLAGS: resource temporarily unavailable
I've also seen error messages with SIOCADDR in them.
Anybody know what's going on? This happened completely out of the blue
and it's the second time. (The first time I reinstalled after 2 solid
days of hacking on --- I don't want to do that again.)
thanks
--
From: Tony Gr
Linux-Networking Digest #463
Linux-Networking Digest #463, Volume #11 Wed, 9 Jun 99 08:13:36 EDT
Contents:
Re: strange NFS messages (Michal Szymanski)
Re: Networking problem with 2.2.x kernels? (Eric LEMAITRE)
Aironet ("zz")
WSP problem ("LaTAzO")
eql and default route ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PPP problems connecting to netcom, (Ian Briggs)
Re: linux server setup w/MediaOne and Windows clients - how? (Brian Vicente)
Gnome-PPP Problems (Glenn Watson)
Re: Why is linux perfomance bad compared to windows? (Tom Bascom)
Telnet like root ("Angel")
Re: Goal: Killer Server (processor) (Robert Krawitz)
Re: Goal: Killer Server (processor) (Moritz Moeller-Herrmann)
Re: Goal: Killer Linux Server! (Moritz Moeller-Herrmann)
Re: PPP nightmare - HELP (Michael Powe)
Two NICs ("Troy Hellman")
Re: Making an ICQ server (Shice Beoney)
Re: Linux vs. 3CON Etherlink III ("Ross Vandegrift")
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michal Szymanski)
Crossposted-To: linux.dev.kernel
Subject: Re: strange NFS messages
Date: 9 Jun 1999 09:49:56 GMT
On 9 Jun 1999 07:33:21 GMT, Matthias Meixner wrote:
Michal Szymanski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have two PCs running RH 6.0 with standard (in 6.0) kernel-level NFS,
automount, kernel 2.2.5 (one SMP, one non-SMP), connected with
fastethernet in small network with 2 Suns. On both PCs, I keep getting
strange messages like:
[...]
Quite simple: the NFS server in linux is broken. You can find some patches
at http://www.fys.uio.no/~trondmy/src/ that reduce the problems, but does
not fix all problems.
Well, but those messages regard exclusively files on Solaris server, not
Linux - so it is rather NFS client complaining.
Michal.
--
Michal Szymanski ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Warsaw University Observatory, Warszawa, POLAND
--
From: Eric LEMAITRE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Networking problem with 2.2.x kernels?
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 11:08:31 +0200
Christer Olsson a écrit :
Hi,
We are having a networking problem at our company (that is all Linux
users).
It seems like something has changed in the networking support (TCP/IP)
in the newest kernels, 2.2.x, because we cannot get through our companys
proxy server anymore. All users still using the 'old' 2.0.x kernels does
not have this problem. Anyone experienced the same problem?
Inside our own network (intranet) everything works fine with the
2.2.x kernels (rlogin, telnet, e-mail, netscape, arena, ftp, etc.).
But not to the 'outside'.
/ Christer
Hi !
Beware, this looks like a transparent firewall/gateway trouble : in old
Linux Red-Hat 5.2 one had to use "ipfwadm" command to allow IP masquerading,
but in new Linux Red-Hat 6.0 "ipfwadm" is no longer valid (it should'nt be
installed at all) and must be replaced by "ipchains". So, I believe this is
an incompatibility between old "ipfwadm" and new "ipchains", but it is too
new for me to be sure of anything (some weeks old only).
Bye !
--
Responsable de formation pour les filières Internet et Linux
--
From: "zz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Aironet
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 16:01:33 -0700
Hi,
Is there anyone familiar with the Aironet PC4800 PCMCIA card. My driver
having problem to create the /proc/aironet...
Thank you very much
Franklin
--
From: "LaTAzO" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WSP problem
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 10:45:33 +0200
English
I have an internet access through a Microsoft Proxy Server on the machine
which have the direct connection to the world and I can use smtp, pop, etc.
from a Windows box on the same server LAN in a natural manner with WSP the
microsoft proxy client. Does exist a way to use these protocols through this
connection from a Linux box?
Thanks, Valentín
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: eql and default route
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 22:30:36 GMT
I would like to setup a connection between two offices using eql.
I would also like to use our internet gateway as the machine for
the local ppp server since it isn't being used as much else. Anyway,
I set the default route of this machine as the ppp link outbound to
the internet. The eql howto by Simon Janes mentions that the eql
link must be made the default route. Is this going to be a problem or
is there a way around this?
---
Dustin Puryear
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Briggs)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP problems connecting to netcom,
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 00:30:17 GMT
Joe Kislo wrote:
excuse my rearranging the order of your original posting...
:rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xcc asyncmap 0xa auth pap magic 0x8f6c35b4
:p
Linux-Networking Digest #463
Linux-Networking Digest #463, Volume #10 Thu, 11 Mar 99 23:13:49 EST
Contents:
Re: Cable Modem Problems ... (Lew Pitcher)
DE-660 pcnet_reset_8390 error (Bernie Ott)
Re: Resetting modems remotely ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Stupid Netscape question. ("Ger Donners")
actiontec PCMCIA fast ethernet card (Glauco Cenciotti)
Re: How to browse the internet via ppp? (Clifford Kite)
Re: NFS With Linux, IBM RS6000 and HP 9000 (L J Bayuk)
Re: can't login to Linux from Win95 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: w98/95-linux ("bane")
Re: Cable Modem Problems ... ("Desmond Coughlan")
Re: newbie: to hub or not to hub? ("bane")
Packet Filtering with dynamic =?iso-8859-2?Q?IP=B4s?= (Folker Wendt)
Re: Can I shutdown linux remotely? ("John Hardin")
Re: Dialup access to Netware through OpenLinux remote access server (George
Tirebiter)
Slow Telnet FTP response ("Ste")
Modem sharing on Linux? ("Gary S. Mackay")
Need Linux ERPCD for Annex3 (Dave D. Cawley)
Re: help PPP script failing (Clifford Kite)
Re: hacked login (telnet) (Colin)
Win95 Group Policies ("Serge Poirier")
Tuning the network in Linux (root)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: Cable Modem Problems ...
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:14:23 GMT
On 11 Mar 1999 20:55:45 GMT, "Desmond Coughlan"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question as to how I can go about getting my new cable modem to
work.
The modem is a Motorola CyberSurfer Wave, and when I boot into Linux, I see
the following:
ne2k-pci.c:v0.99L 2/7/98 D. Becker/P. Gortmaker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/ne2k-pci.html
ne2k-pci.c: PCI NE2000 clone 'RealTek RTL-8029' at I/O 0xd800, IRQ 10.
eth0: PCI NE2000 found at 0xd800, IRQ 10, 00:00:B4:9B:20:1C.
ne2k-pci.c: PCI NE2000 clone 'RealTek RTL-8029' at I/O 0xd400, IRQ 11.
eth1: PCI NE2000 found at 0xd400, IRQ 11, 00:40:05:E2:F5:D2.
This strikes me as bizarre, seeing that I did no configuration whatsoever,
for the second card, which is the one to which my modem is connected ...
:-| In addition, the box says SN2000, but I assume that it is an NE2000
compatible.
I run ifconfig, and see the following:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:B4:9B:20:1C
inet addr:192.68.0.1 Bcast:192.68.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:49 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xd800
The second card isn't there, as you can see.
So my question is: how do I enable that card at boot?
Some drivers autodetect all cards of the same type (as you saw), and
build the devices in sequence. I'd say the driver detected your
cable-modem ethernet card and installed it as eth1.
However, this does not mean that Linux knows how to get to eth1, just
that it exists. You still have to ifconfig the eth1 device in order to
get it to work. Your ISP might require you to use DHCP, in which case
you'll have to do a little bit of research.
I can ping to the inside of my LAN, but not to the outside, and I can't
resolve hostnames either. I've read the NET-3 HOWTO, but the problem is
that I can't pass parameters to LILO when I boot, as I don't use LILO: I
boot from a diskette. I could install from scratch, and install LILO, but
my system is running just the way I want it, including my girlfriend's
thesis ... :-)
Why don't I just type:
dd if=/dev/fd0 of=/vmlinuz
I hear you ask ...
I tried: when I run LILO, it tells me the kernel is too big.
Your suggestions would be welcome, as I have 2 Mb/s just waiting to be used
here ... :-)
Thanks.
D.Coughlan.
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Development Services
Toronto Dominion Bank
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employers')
--
From: Bernie Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: DE-660 pcnet_reset_8390 error
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 01:35:23 GMT
A previous post on this subject got little response. Here's another
post.
I've got a laptop with a D-LINK DE-660 pcmcia network card.
I've got RedHat 5.2 installed.
I had this card working for a few hours one night about 2 weeks ago, but
have not had any luck since. It works fine under Windows 98.
I'm getting the following error:
pcnet_reset_8390(): did not complete
I'm getting to high-toned beeps, indicating a successful install.
Anytime I reinstall Linux, I have to go in to /etc/pcmcia/config.opts
and
add my hardware address to one of the lines, otherwise I get an error
message
about not being able to determine my Hardware Address.
I've tried using the Card Services 3.05, 3.08, and 3.09.
The 3.09 version is where I had luck a few weeks ago.
Please help.
