RE: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] Add prefetch and dma support for omap2/3 NAND driver

2009-06-09 Thread Singh, Vimal


On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Tony Lindgrent...@atomide.com wrote:
 * Singh, Vimal 
 imceaex-_o=ti_ou=bd_cn=recipients_cn=x0094...@dlee86.itg.ti.com [090608 
 09:01]:

 On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Tony Lindgrent...@atomide.com wrote:
  * Singh, Vimal 
  imceaex-_o=ti_ou=bd_cn=recipients_cn=x0094...@dlee86.itg.ti.com [090605 
  05:00]:
 
 
  On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Tony Lindgrent...@atomide.com wrote:
   * vimal singh vimalsi...@ti.com [090604 02:34]:
   On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com 
   wrote:
* Singh, Vimal
   imceaex-_o=ti_ou=bd_cn=recipients_cn=x0094...@dlee86.itg.ti.com 
   [090602
   23:46]:
   
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com 
wrote:
 * vimal singh vimalsi...@ti.com [090602 05:40]:
 This patch adds prefetch support to access nand flash in both 
 mpu and dma
   mode.
 This patch also adds 8-bit nand support (omap_read/write_buf8).
 Prefetch can be used for both 8- and 16-bit devices.

 This should be reviewed on the linux-omap@vger.kernel.org list 
 for sure.
 One other comment below.

 Signed-off-by: Vimal Singh vimalsi...@ti.com
 ---
 I prepared this patch on top of OMAP2 / OMAP3 NAND driver 
 patch:
 http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-May/025562.html

 ---
  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |  102 ++
  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/gpmc.h |4
  drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig   |   17 +
  drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c   |  308
   -
  4 files changed, 422 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

 Index: mtd-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
 ===
 --- mtd-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
 +++ mtd-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
 @@ -54,6 +54,12 @@
  #define GPMC_CHUNK_SHIFT 24  /* 16 MB */
  #define GPMC_SECTION_SHIFT   28  /* 128 MB */

 +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH
 +#define CS_NUM_SHIFT 24
 +#define ENABLE_PREFETCH  7
 +#define DMA_MPU_MODE 2
 +#endif
 +
  static struct resource   gpmc_mem_root;
  static struct resource   gpmc_cs_mem[GPMC_CS_NUM];
  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpmc_mem_lock);
 @@ -383,6 +389,99 @@ void gpmc_cs_free(int cs)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpmc_cs_free);

 +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH
 +/**
 + * gpmc_prefetch_init - configures default configuration for 
 prefetch
   engine
 + */
 +static void gpmc_prefetch_init(void)
 +{
 + /* Setting the default threshold to 64 */
 + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONTROL, 0x0);
 + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG1, 0x40   8);
 + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG2, 0x0);
 +}

 Why would you want to have NAND specific init code int gpmc.c?

 The purpose if gpmc.c is to provide access to configuring the
 General Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC). You should just provide
 functions in gpmc.c for the platform init code to use, and then
 the drivers can stay platform independent.
   
In my understanding, this 'prefetch' engine is part of GPMC itself, 
it is a
kind of feature provided by GPMC which can be utilized by NAND 
driver.
So, to me, it makes sens to get initialized prefetch by GPMC itself 
so that
NAND driver can use it.
   
But it should not have a dependency to NAND.
  
   This engine, in GPMC, is dedicated for NAND devices only.
  
   
Another reason was that all read / write to GPMC register are done 
by
functions 'gpmc_read_reg' / 'gpmc_write_reg', which have been made
'static' in nature.
   
That's why you need to provide a generic function in gpmc.c to enable
prefetch that the platform code for any driver can use.
  
   Exactly, and whenever a platform code uses gpmc init call, gpmc 
   initializes
   this engine too. Since prefetch engine is the part of GPMC, IMHOP, it 
   should
   get initialized as part of GPMC initialization.
  
   No, the driver needing it should initialize it. There should not be any
   ifdefs needed in the gpmc.c for that.
 
  Are you suggesting to move gpmc prefetch specific code to 
  'drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c'?
  This can be done but then, we will be accessing gpmc registers outside 
  gpmc.c. Is that ok?
 
  Well I'm thinking that you just basically need something like this in
  gpmc.c:
 
  int gpmc_prefetch_request(int cs);
  int gpmc_prefetch_enable(int cs);
  int gpmc_prefetch_reset(int cs);
  ...
 
  And gpmc_prefetch_request would then return an error if already taken.
  No need then to tinker with the GPMC prefetch registers in the NAND
  driver.

 This seems exactly what in this patch has been done, other than renaming the 
 functions and suggestion that gpmc prefetch init call

RE: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] Add prefetch and dma support for omap2/3 NAND driver

2009-06-08 Thread Singh, Vimal

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Tony Lindgrent...@atomide.com wrote:
 * Singh, Vimal 
 imceaex-_o=ti_ou=bd_cn=recipients_cn=x0094...@dlee86.itg.ti.com [090605 
 05:00]:


 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Tony Lindgrent...@atomide.com wrote:
  * vimal singh vimalsi...@ti.com [090604 02:34]:
  On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
   * Singh, Vimal
  imceaex-_o=ti_ou=bd_cn=recipients_cn=x0094...@dlee86.itg.ti.com [090602
  23:46]:
  
   On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* vimal singh vimalsi...@ti.com [090602 05:40]:
This patch adds prefetch support to access nand flash in both mpu 
and dma
  mode.
This patch also adds 8-bit nand support (omap_read/write_buf8).
Prefetch can be used for both 8- and 16-bit devices.
   
This should be reviewed on the linux-omap@vger.kernel.org list for 
sure.
One other comment below.
   
Signed-off-by: Vimal Singh vimalsi...@ti.com
---
I prepared this patch on top of OMAP2 / OMAP3 NAND driver patch:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-May/025562.html
   
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |  102 ++
 arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/gpmc.h |4
 drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig   |   17 +
 drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c   |  308
  -
 4 files changed, 422 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
   
Index: mtd-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
===
--- mtd-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
+++ mtd-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
@@ -54,6 +54,12 @@
 #define GPMC_CHUNK_SHIFT 24  /* 16 MB */
 #define GPMC_SECTION_SHIFT   28  /* 128 MB */
   
+#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH
+#define CS_NUM_SHIFT 24
+#define ENABLE_PREFETCH  7
+#define DMA_MPU_MODE 2
+#endif
+
 static struct resource   gpmc_mem_root;
 static struct resource   gpmc_cs_mem[GPMC_CS_NUM];
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpmc_mem_lock);
@@ -383,6 +389,99 @@ void gpmc_cs_free(int cs)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpmc_cs_free);
   
+#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH
+/**
+ * gpmc_prefetch_init - configures default configuration for 
prefetch
  engine
+ */
+static void gpmc_prefetch_init(void)
+{
+ /* Setting the default threshold to 64 */
+ gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONTROL, 0x0);
+ gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG1, 0x40   8);
+ gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG2, 0x0);
+}
   
Why would you want to have NAND specific init code int gpmc.c?
   
The purpose if gpmc.c is to provide access to configuring the
General Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC). You should just provide
functions in gpmc.c for the platform init code to use, and then
the drivers can stay platform independent.
  
   In my understanding, this 'prefetch' engine is part of GPMC itself, it 
   is a
   kind of feature provided by GPMC which can be utilized by NAND driver.
   So, to me, it makes sens to get initialized prefetch by GPMC itself so 
   that
   NAND driver can use it.
  
   But it should not have a dependency to NAND.
 
  This engine, in GPMC, is dedicated for NAND devices only.
 
  
   Another reason was that all read / write to GPMC register are done by
   functions 'gpmc_read_reg' / 'gpmc_write_reg', which have been made
   'static' in nature.
  
   That's why you need to provide a generic function in gpmc.c to enable
   prefetch that the platform code for any driver can use.
 
  Exactly, and whenever a platform code uses gpmc init call, gpmc 
  initializes
  this engine too. Since prefetch engine is the part of GPMC, IMHOP, it 
  should
  get initialized as part of GPMC initialization.
 
  No, the driver needing it should initialize it. There should not be any
  ifdefs needed in the gpmc.c for that.

 Are you suggesting to move gpmc prefetch specific code to 
 'drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c'?
 This can be done but then, we will be accessing gpmc registers outside 
 gpmc.c. Is that ok?

 Well I'm thinking that you just basically need something like this in
 gpmc.c:

 int gpmc_prefetch_request(int cs);
 int gpmc_prefetch_enable(int cs);
 int gpmc_prefetch_reset(int cs);
 ...

 And gpmc_prefetch_request would then return an error if already taken.
 No need then to tinker with the GPMC prefetch registers in the NAND
 driver.

This seems exactly what in this patch has been done, other than renaming the 
functions and suggestion that gpmc prefetch init call should happen from NAND 
driver and should return success or failure based on whether it has already 
been initialized or not. Am I correct?

But since, the prefetch and write-posting engine is a single-context engine 
that can be allocated to only one chip-select at a time for a read prefetch or 
a write-posting process, I

RE: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] Add prefetch and dma support for omap2/3 NAND driver

2009-06-05 Thread Singh, Vimal


On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Tony Lindgrent...@atomide.com wrote:
 * vimal singh vimalsi...@ti.com [090604 02:34]:
 On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
  * Singh, Vimal
 imceaex-_o=ti_ou=bd_cn=recipients_cn=x0094...@dlee86.itg.ti.com [090602
 23:46]:
 
  On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
   * vimal singh vimalsi...@ti.com [090602 05:40]:
   This patch adds prefetch support to access nand flash in both mpu and 
   dma
 mode.
   This patch also adds 8-bit nand support (omap_read/write_buf8).
   Prefetch can be used for both 8- and 16-bit devices.
  
   This should be reviewed on the linux-omap@vger.kernel.org list for sure.
   One other comment below.
  
   Signed-off-by: Vimal Singh vimalsi...@ti.com
   ---
   I prepared this patch on top of OMAP2 / OMAP3 NAND driver patch:
   http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-May/025562.html
  
   ---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |  102 ++
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/gpmc.h |4
drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig   |   17 +
drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c   |  308
 -
4 files changed, 422 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
  
   Index: mtd-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
   ===
   --- mtd-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
   +++ mtd-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
   @@ -54,6 +54,12 @@
#define GPMC_CHUNK_SHIFT 24  /* 16 MB */
#define GPMC_SECTION_SHIFT   28  /* 128 MB */
  
   +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH
   +#define CS_NUM_SHIFT 24
   +#define ENABLE_PREFETCH  7
   +#define DMA_MPU_MODE 2
   +#endif
   +
static struct resource   gpmc_mem_root;
static struct resource   gpmc_cs_mem[GPMC_CS_NUM];
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpmc_mem_lock);
   @@ -383,6 +389,99 @@ void gpmc_cs_free(int cs)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpmc_cs_free);
  
   +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH
   +/**
   + * gpmc_prefetch_init - configures default configuration for prefetch
 engine
   + */
   +static void gpmc_prefetch_init(void)
   +{
   + /* Setting the default threshold to 64 */
   + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONTROL, 0x0);
   + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG1, 0x40   8);
   + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG2, 0x0);
   +}
  
   Why would you want to have NAND specific init code int gpmc.c?
  
   The purpose if gpmc.c is to provide access to configuring the
   General Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC). You should just provide
   functions in gpmc.c for the platform init code to use, and then
   the drivers can stay platform independent.
 
  In my understanding, this 'prefetch' engine is part of GPMC itself, it is 
  a
  kind of feature provided by GPMC which can be utilized by NAND driver.
  So, to me, it makes sens to get initialized prefetch by GPMC itself so 
  that
  NAND driver can use it.
 
  But it should not have a dependency to NAND.

 This engine, in GPMC, is dedicated for NAND devices only.

 
  Another reason was that all read / write to GPMC register are done by
  functions 'gpmc_read_reg' / 'gpmc_write_reg', which have been made
  'static' in nature.
 
  That's why you need to provide a generic function in gpmc.c to enable
  prefetch that the platform code for any driver can use.

 Exactly, and whenever a platform code uses gpmc init call, gpmc initializes
 this engine too. Since prefetch engine is the part of GPMC, IMHOP, it should
 get initialized as part of GPMC initialization.

 No, the driver needing it should initialize it. There should not be any
 ifdefs needed in the gpmc.c for that.

Are you suggesting to move gpmc prefetch specific code to 
'drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c'?
This can be done but then, we will be accessing gpmc registers outside gpmc.c. 
Is that ok?


 And then there are prefetch start, stop and status functions calls have been
 provided to be used by NAND driver.

 These should really be done in the platform init code for the NAND driver.
 The NAND driver really should be generic, not omap specific.

Are you talking about different omap versions or omap itself, I am bit 
confused. This NAND driver is 
omap specific only.

-Vimal

 Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] Add prefetch and dma support for omap2/3 NAND driver

2009-06-03 Thread Singh, Vimal

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
 * vimal singh vimalsi...@ti.com [090602 05:40]:
 This patch adds prefetch support to access nand flash in both mpu and dma 
 mode.
 This patch also adds 8-bit nand support (omap_read/write_buf8).
 Prefetch can be used for both 8- and 16-bit devices.

 This should be reviewed on the linux-omap@vger.kernel.org list for sure.
 One other comment below.

 Signed-off-by: Vimal Singh vimalsi...@ti.com
 ---
 I prepared this patch on top of OMAP2 / OMAP3 NAND driver patch:
 http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-May/025562.html

 ---
  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c |  102 ++
  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/gpmc.h |4
  drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig   |   17 +
  drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c   |  308 
 -
  4 files changed, 422 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

 Index: mtd-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
 ===
 --- mtd-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
 +++ mtd-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c
 @@ -54,6 +54,12 @@
  #define GPMC_CHUNK_SHIFT 24  /* 16 MB */
  #define GPMC_SECTION_SHIFT   28  /* 128 MB */

 +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH
 +#define CS_NUM_SHIFT 24
 +#define ENABLE_PREFETCH  7
 +#define DMA_MPU_MODE 2
 +#endif
 +
  static struct resource   gpmc_mem_root;
  static struct resource   gpmc_cs_mem[GPMC_CS_NUM];
  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gpmc_mem_lock);
 @@ -383,6 +389,99 @@ void gpmc_cs_free(int cs)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpmc_cs_free);

 +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH
 +/**
 + * gpmc_prefetch_init - configures default configuration for prefetch engine
 + */
 +static void gpmc_prefetch_init(void)
 +{
 + /* Setting the default threshold to 64 */
 + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONTROL, 0x0);
 + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG1, 0x40   8);
 + gpmc_write_reg(GPMC_PREFETCH_CONFIG2, 0x0);
 +}

 Why would you want to have NAND specific init code int gpmc.c?

 The purpose if gpmc.c is to provide access to configuring the
 General Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC). You should just provide
 functions in gpmc.c for the platform init code to use, and then
 the drivers can stay platform independent.

In my understanding, this 'prefetch' engine is part of GPMC itself, it is a
kind of feature provided by GPMC which can be utilized by NAND driver.
So, to me, it makes sens to get initialized prefetch by GPMC itself so that 
NAND driver can use it.

Another reason was that all read / write to GPMC register are done by 
functions 'gpmc_read_reg' / 'gpmc_write_reg', which have been made
'static' in nature.

Regards,
vimal--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH] OMAP2 NAND: Fix __raw_readsl() length argument

2008-10-24 Thread Singh, Vimal

 -   __raw_readsl(nand-IO_ADDR_R, buf, len / 2);
 +   __raw_readsw(nand-IO_ADDR_R, buf, len / 2);

I would prefer len  1 rather len / 2.

---
vimal--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [RESENDING][PATCH 1/2]OMAP3 NAND: Add NAND support on OMAP3430

2008-10-06 Thread Singh, Vimal
On Modday 06 October 2008, Devid Brownell wrote:
 On Monday 06 October 2008, Tony Lindgren wrote:
   --- linux-omap-2.6_27_08_2008.orig/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
   +++ linux-omap-2.6_27_08_2008/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
   @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
 */
#define NAND_MAX_OOBSIZE 64
#define NAND_MAX_PAGESIZE2048
   -
   +#define NAND_BLOCK_SIZE  SZ_128K
/*
 
 This is specific to 3430 SDP though ... there are plenty
 of other NAND block sizes in the world.
 
 Suggest moving this definition to board-3430sdp-flash.c
 where it's relevant.

Agree. I will send a patch to move it.

...
vimal--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [Resend][PATCH - Omapzoom][NAND] Add prefetch and DMA support

2008-09-10 Thread Singh, Vimal
Hi,

 On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 01:03:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND_OMAP_PREFETCH
  + static int use_prefetch = 1;
  +
  + /* modprobe ... use_prefetch=0 etc */
  + module_param(use_prefetch, bool, 0);
  + MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_prefetch, enable/disable use of PREFETCH);
 
 Don't indent C code just because there's preprocessor stuff around it.

Ok, I will remove it.


  + init_completion(info-comp);
  + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(info-pdev-dev,
  + virt_to_phys(addr), count, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
 
 Please read the DMA API and use the proper functions.  This is an abuse
 of the DMA API.
 
  + omap_start_dma(info-dma_ch);
  + wait_for_completion(info-comp);
  + if (!is_write)
  + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(info-pdev-dev,
  + virt_to_phys(addr), count, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
 
 Ditto.  This is an abuse of the API.  This is how it's supposed to work:
 
 
 enum dma_direction dir = is_write ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE;
 dma_addr_t dma_addr;
 
 dma_addr = dma_map_single(info-pdev-dev, addr, count, dir);
 
 /* setup and start DMA using dma_addr */
 
 wait_for_completion(info-comp);
 
 dma_unmap_single(info-pdev-dev, dma_addr, count, dir);
 

I will fix this in my next patch.


  @@ -201,11 +304,33 @@
struct omap_nand_info *info = container_of(mtd,
struct omap_nand_info, mtd);
u16 *p = (u16 *) buf;
  -
  - len = 1;
  -
  - while (len--)
  - *p++ = cpu_to_le16(readw(info-nand.IO_ADDR_R));
 
 This driver needs work (see endianness explaination below.)

This has been fixed by David Brownell, and I will re-base my patch on top of it.

  + while (len) {
  + bytes_to_read  = ((prefetch_status  24)  
  0x7F)  1;
  + for (i = 0; (i  bytes_to_read)  (len); 
  i++, len -= 2)
  + *p++ = cpu_to_le16(*(volatile u16 
  *)(info-nand_pref_fifo_add));
 
 Yet you dereference it.  This is illegal according to the Linux APIs.
 Use __raw_readw() here.

Ok, I will do this.

 Moreover, 'p' is a pointer to CPU endian memory, not le16 memory, so
 using cpu_to_le16 is wrong here.  What endian is there data in flash?

Accessing nand flash is done by prefetch engine, which is also part of omap,
so has same endianness.
Yes I will remove cpu_to_le16 in my next patch.



Thanks,
vimal--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Kconfig support HW ECC for nand driver on OMAP3

2008-09-04 Thread Singh, Vimal
Hi,
This stuff should be all going to the MTD list now. If we still have
some MTD drivers that are not included in the MTD tree, we should
prepare them for merging and send them to the MTD list.
Thanks.
Ok, I will be taking it to mtd after few weeks.

Thanks,

Tony--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html