[PATCH REBASE 0/6] i2c: omap: misc changes
Hi, this is just a rebase of the previous series adding support for amount of bytes transferred upon NACK. Well, actually the patches implementing transferred bytes reporting aren't here because we need to discuss how to move forward. This series is just a preparation for that, but it also contains a at least one bugfix. Each and every patch has been tested with pandaboard, it would be nice to get Tested-bys from other folks on other platforms before pushing this for v3.9 (there's more than enough time for that). Note that we're also dropping b_hw flag since that becomes useless since we'll never set STT and STP together anymore. Give it a good round of test, please. Felipe Balbi (6): i2c: omap: no need to access platform_device i2c: omap: also complete() when stat becomes zero i2c: omap: improve 'rev' a little bit i2c: omap: in case of VERSION_2 read IRQSTATUS_RAW but write to IRQSTATUS i2c: omap: wait for transfer completion before sending STP bit i2c: omap: get rid of b_hw flag drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 184 +- 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) -- 1.8.1.rc1.5.g7e0651a -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH REBASE 0/6] i2c: omap: misc changes
Hi, On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 06:34:03PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > this is just a rebase of the previous series adding support > for amount of bytes transferred upon NACK. > > Well, actually the patches implementing transferred bytes > reporting aren't here because we need to discuss how to move > forward. > > This series is just a preparation for that, but it also > contains a at least one bugfix. > > Each and every patch has been tested with pandaboard, it > would be nice to get Tested-bys from other folks on other > platforms before pushing this for v3.9 (there's more than > enough time for that). > > Note that we're also dropping b_hw flag since that becomes > useless since we'll never set STT and STP together anymore. > > Give it a good round of test, please. Wolfram, I have these patches rebased on top of v3.8-rc3 if you wish. Let me know if I should resend them (again). cheers -- balbi signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH REBASE 0/6] i2c: omap: misc changes
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:16:28PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 06:34:03PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > this is just a rebase of the previous series adding support > > for amount of bytes transferred upon NACK. > > > > Well, actually the patches implementing transferred bytes > > reporting aren't here because we need to discuss how to move > > forward. > > > > This series is just a preparation for that, but it also > > contains a at least one bugfix. > > > > Each and every patch has been tested with pandaboard, it > > would be nice to get Tested-bys from other folks on other > > platforms before pushing this for v3.9 (there's more than > > enough time for that). > > > > Note that we're also dropping b_hw flag since that becomes > > useless since we'll never set STT and STP together anymore. > > > > Give it a good round of test, please. > > Wolfram, I have these patches rebased on top of v3.8-rc3 if you wish. > Let me know if I should resend them (again). Yes, please rebase on top of Aaro's patches (probably in v3.8-rc5). Patches look mostly good, have to think more about what Patch 5 is wanting to achieve at the end of the day. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
