Re: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables

2009-09-30 Thread Kevin Hilman
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Kevin Hilman
 wrote:
> "Premi, Sanjeev"  writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There is no generic function to translate an OPP to FREQ and vice versa.
>> Came across the problem while trying to submit a follow-up to earlier
>> patch for change in mpurate via bootargs.
>>
>> The function get_opp in resource34xx.c, but it is always called with an
>> explicit addition of MAX_VDDn_OPP e.g.
>>
>>   opp = get_opp(mpu_opps + MAX_VDD1_OPP, clk->rate);
>>   opp = get_opp(l3_opps + MAX_VDD2_OPP, clk->rate);
>>
>> This is 'addition' is required as there is no encapsulation of the
>> MIN and MAX VDDs associated to the table.
>>
>> The patch below fixes this issue; buy creating a 'table' object with
>> necessary information. It can also help in getting rid of the
>> empty {0, 0, 0} at index 0 of each OPP table.
>>
>> At the moment, it does not break any functionality in resource34xx.c;
>> migration to this encapsulation can be taken as next step.
>>
>> This code is bare 'git-diff' for early comments. Formal patch to follow...
>
> Looks ok.  Please send updated patch against current PM branch.

oops, please ignore.  I see you already posted a patch.  Will comment there.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables

2009-09-30 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Premi, Sanjeev"  writes:

> Hi all,
>
> There is no generic function to translate an OPP to FREQ and vice versa.
> Came across the problem while trying to submit a follow-up to earlier
> patch for change in mpurate via bootargs. 
>
> The function get_opp in resource34xx.c, but it is always called with an
> explicit addition of MAX_VDDn_OPP e.g.
>
>   opp = get_opp(mpu_opps + MAX_VDD1_OPP, clk->rate);
>   opp = get_opp(l3_opps + MAX_VDD2_OPP, clk->rate);
>
> This is 'addition' is required as there is no encapsulation of the
> MIN and MAX VDDs associated to the table.
>
> The patch below fixes this issue; buy creating a 'table' object with
> necessary information. It can also help in getting rid of the
> empty {0, 0, 0} at index 0 of each OPP table.
>
> At the moment, it does not break any functionality in resource34xx.c;
> migration to this encapsulation can be taken as next step.
>
> This code is bare 'git-diff' for early comments. Formal patch to follow...

Looks ok.  Please send updated patch against current PM branch.

Thanks,

Kevin

> Best regards,
> Sanjeev
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h 
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
> index 583e540..2357784 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ struct omap_opp {
> u16 vsel;
>  };
>  
> +/* struct omap_opp_table - View OPP table as an object
> + * @min: Minimum OPP id
> + * @max: Maximim OPP id
> + * @opps: Pointer to array defining the OPPs.
> + *
> + * An OPP table has varied length. Knowing minimum and maximum
> + * OPP ids allow easy traversal.
> + */
> +struct omap_opp_table {
> +   u8  min;
> +   u8  max;
> +   struct omap_opp* opps;
> +};
> +
>  extern struct omap_opp *mpu_opps;
>  extern struct omap_opp *dsp_opps;
>  extern struct omap_opp *l3_opps;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> index fec7d00..c90b1af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 
>  
>  #include "prm-regbits-34xx.h"
>  #include "pm.h"
> @@ -281,3 +282,50 @@ static int __init omap_pm_init(void)
> return error;
>  }
>  late_initcall(omap_pm_init);
> +
> +/*
> + * Get frequency corresponding to an OPP
> + */
> +int opp_to_freq(unsigned int* freq, struct omap_opp_table* table, u8 opp)
> +{
> +int i, found=0;
> +
> +if (table && table->opps) {
> +for (i=table->min;  table->opps[i].opp_id <= table->max; i++)
> +if (table->opps[i].opp_id == opp) {
> +found = 1;
> +break;
> +}
> +
> +if (found) {
> +*freq = table->opps[i].rate;
> +return 1;
> +}
> +}
> +
> +return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Get OPP corresponding to a frequency
> + */
> +int freq_to_opp(u8* opp, struct omap_opp_table* table, unsigned long freq)
> +{
> +int i, found=0;
> +
> +if (table && table->opps) {
> +for (i=table->min;  table->opps[i].opp_id <= table->max; i++)
> +if (table->opps[i].rate == freq) {
> +found = 1;
> +break;
> +}
> +
> +if (found) {
> +*opp = table->opps[i].opp_id;
> +return 1;
> +}
> +}
> +
> +return 0;
> +}
> +
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables

2009-09-14 Thread Premi, Sanjeev
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org 
> [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Hilman
> Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 2:52 AM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables
> 
> "Premi, Sanjeev"  writes:
> 
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] 
> >> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 12:00 AM
> >> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> >> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables
> >> 
> >> "Premi, Sanjeev"  writes:
> >> 
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > There is no generic function to translate an OPP to FREQ 
> >> and vice versa.
> >> > Came across the problem while trying to submit a follow-up 
> >> to earlier
> >> > patch for change in mpurate via bootargs. 
> >> >
> >> > The function get_opp in resource34xx.c, but it is always 
> >> called with an
> >> > explicit addition of MAX_VDDn_OPP e.g.
> >> >
> >> >   opp = get_opp(mpu_opps + MAX_VDD1_OPP, clk->rate);
> >> >   opp = get_opp(l3_opps + MAX_VDD2_OPP, clk->rate);
> >> >
> >> > This is 'addition' is required as there is no 
> encapsulation of the
> >> > MIN and MAX VDDs associated to the table.
> >> >
> >> > The patch below fixes this issue; buy creating a 'table' 
> object with
> >> > necessary information. It can also help in getting rid of the
> >> > empty {0, 0, 0} at index 0 of each OPP table.
> >> >
> >> > At the moment, it does not break any functionality in 
> >> resource34xx.c;
> >> > migration to this encapsulation can be taken as next step.
> >> >
> >> > This code is bare 'git-diff' for early comments. Formal 
> >> patch to follow...
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Sanjeev
> >> 
> >> Is the goal of the min and max fields so you could have some OPPs
> >> in the table that aren't valid for some SoCs?  IOW, the 'max' value
> >> might be higher on newer SoCs with higher OPPs.
> >
> > The goal is to have get_*() functions where caller 
> shouldn't be aware
> > of the MAX_ for the table. Considering table as an object, it should
> > be able to provide its own length.
> >
> > Reason to use min and max was to maintain current 
> functionality as is.
> > Else, simple 'length' should be sufficient.
> >
> >> 
> >> What if you want a list of OPPs, but want to remove one from the
> >> middle of the list?  The min/max approach doesn't work here.
> >> 
> >> What about a also extending the struct omap_opp to have 
> some sort of
> >> valid field.
> >
> > This doesn't help in eliminating the addition of MAX value for each
> > function call.
> 
> No it doesn't.  I'm just thinking about the next step of 
> having a more flexible list of OPPs.

[sp] Oh yes, it will be a good addition.
 I misunderstood your earlier comment :(

Best regards,
Sanjeev
> 
> Kevin
> 
> snip---snip--snip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables

2009-09-11 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Premi, Sanjeev"  writes:

>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] 
>> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 12:00 AM
>> To: Premi, Sanjeev
>> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables
>> 
>> "Premi, Sanjeev"  writes:
>> 
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > There is no generic function to translate an OPP to FREQ 
>> and vice versa.
>> > Came across the problem while trying to submit a follow-up 
>> to earlier
>> > patch for change in mpurate via bootargs. 
>> >
>> > The function get_opp in resource34xx.c, but it is always 
>> called with an
>> > explicit addition of MAX_VDDn_OPP e.g.
>> >
>> >   opp = get_opp(mpu_opps + MAX_VDD1_OPP, clk->rate);
>> >   opp = get_opp(l3_opps + MAX_VDD2_OPP, clk->rate);
>> >
>> > This is 'addition' is required as there is no encapsulation of the
>> > MIN and MAX VDDs associated to the table.
>> >
>> > The patch below fixes this issue; buy creating a 'table' object with
>> > necessary information. It can also help in getting rid of the
>> > empty {0, 0, 0} at index 0 of each OPP table.
>> >
>> > At the moment, it does not break any functionality in 
>> resource34xx.c;
>> > migration to this encapsulation can be taken as next step.
>> >
>> > This code is bare 'git-diff' for early comments. Formal 
>> patch to follow...
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Sanjeev
>> 
>> Is the goal of the min and max fields so you could have some OPPs
>> in the table that aren't valid for some SoCs?  IOW, the 'max' value
>> might be higher on newer SoCs with higher OPPs.
>
> The goal is to have get_*() functions where caller shouldn't be aware
> of the MAX_ for the table. Considering table as an object, it should
> be able to provide its own length.
>
> Reason to use min and max was to maintain current functionality as is.
> Else, simple 'length' should be sufficient.
>
>> 
>> What if you want a list of OPPs, but want to remove one from the
>> middle of the list?  The min/max approach doesn't work here.
>> 
>> What about a also extending the struct omap_opp to have some sort of
>> valid field.
>
> This doesn't help in eliminating the addition of MAX value for each
> function call.

No it doesn't.  I'm just thinking about the next step of having a more flexible 
list of OPPs.

Kevin

>> 
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h 
>> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
>> > index 583e540..2357784 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
>> > @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ struct omap_opp {
>> > u16 vsel;
>> >  };
>> >  
>> > +/* struct omap_opp_table - View OPP table as an object
>> > + * @min: Minimum OPP id
>> > + * @max: Maximim OPP id
>> > + * @opps: Pointer to array defining the OPPs.
>> > + *
>> > + * An OPP table has varied length. Knowing minimum and maximum
>> > + * OPP ids allow easy traversal.
>> > + */
>> > +struct omap_opp_table {
>> > +   u8  min;
>> > +   u8  max;
>> > +   struct omap_opp* opps;
>> > +};
>> > +
>> >  extern struct omap_opp *mpu_opps;
>> >  extern struct omap_opp *dsp_opps;
>> >  extern struct omap_opp *l3_opps;
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
>> > index fec7d00..c90b1af 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
>> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>> >  #include 
>> >  #include 
>> >  #include 
>> > +#include 
>> >  
>> >  #include "prm-regbits-34xx.h"
>> >  #include "pm.h"
>> > @@ -281,3 +282,50 @@ static int __init omap_pm_init(void)
>> > return error;
>> >  }
>> >  late_initcall(omap_pm_init);
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * Get frequency corresponding to an OPP
>> > + */
>> > +int opp_to_freq(unsigned int* freq, struct omap_opp_table* 
>> table, u8 opp)
>> > +{
>> > +int i, found=0;
>> > +
>> > +if (table && table->opps) {
>> > +for (

RE: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables

2009-09-10 Thread Premi, Sanjeev

> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] 
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 12:00 AM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables
> 
> "Premi, Sanjeev"  writes:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There is no generic function to translate an OPP to FREQ 
> and vice versa.
> > Came across the problem while trying to submit a follow-up 
> to earlier
> > patch for change in mpurate via bootargs. 
> >
> > The function get_opp in resource34xx.c, but it is always 
> called with an
> > explicit addition of MAX_VDDn_OPP e.g.
> >
> >   opp = get_opp(mpu_opps + MAX_VDD1_OPP, clk->rate);
> >   opp = get_opp(l3_opps + MAX_VDD2_OPP, clk->rate);
> >
> > This is 'addition' is required as there is no encapsulation of the
> > MIN and MAX VDDs associated to the table.
> >
> > The patch below fixes this issue; buy creating a 'table' object with
> > necessary information. It can also help in getting rid of the
> > empty {0, 0, 0} at index 0 of each OPP table.
> >
> > At the moment, it does not break any functionality in 
> resource34xx.c;
> > migration to this encapsulation can be taken as next step.
> >
> > This code is bare 'git-diff' for early comments. Formal 
> patch to follow...
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Sanjeev
> 
> Is the goal of the min and max fields so you could have some OPPs
> in the table that aren't valid for some SoCs?  IOW, the 'max' value
> might be higher on newer SoCs with higher OPPs.

The goal is to have get_*() functions where caller shouldn't be aware
of the MAX_ for the table. Considering table as an object, it should
be able to provide its own length.

Reason to use min and max was to maintain current functionality as is.
Else, simple 'length' should be sufficient.

> 
> What if you want a list of OPPs, but want to remove one from the
> middle of the list?  The min/max approach doesn't work here.
> 
> What about a also extending the struct omap_opp to have some sort of
> valid field.

This doesn't help in eliminating the addition of MAX value for each
function call.

> 
> Kevin
> 
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h 
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
> > index 583e540..2357784 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
> > @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ struct omap_opp {
> > u16 vsel;
> >  };
> >  
> > +/* struct omap_opp_table - View OPP table as an object
> > + * @min: Minimum OPP id
> > + * @max: Maximim OPP id
> > + * @opps: Pointer to array defining the OPPs.
> > + *
> > + * An OPP table has varied length. Knowing minimum and maximum
> > + * OPP ids allow easy traversal.
> > + */
> > +struct omap_opp_table {
> > +   u8  min;
> > +   u8  max;
> > +   struct omap_opp* opps;
> > +};
> > +
> >  extern struct omap_opp *mpu_opps;
> >  extern struct omap_opp *dsp_opps;
> >  extern struct omap_opp *l3_opps;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> > index fec7d00..c90b1af 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> > +#include 
> >  
> >  #include "prm-regbits-34xx.h"
> >  #include "pm.h"
> > @@ -281,3 +282,50 @@ static int __init omap_pm_init(void)
> > return error;
> >  }
> >  late_initcall(omap_pm_init);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Get frequency corresponding to an OPP
> > + */
> > +int opp_to_freq(unsigned int* freq, struct omap_opp_table* 
> table, u8 opp)
> > +{
> > +int i, found=0;
> > +
> > +if (table && table->opps) {
> > +for (i=table->min;  table->opps[i].opp_id 
> <= table->max; i++)
> > +if (table->opps[i].opp_id == opp) {
> > +found = 1;
> > +break;
> > +}
> > +
> > +if (found) {
> > +*freq = table->opps[i].rate;
> > +return 1;
> > +}
> > +}
> > +
> > +return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Get OPP corresponding to a

Re: [RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables

2009-09-10 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Premi, Sanjeev"  writes:

> Hi all,
>
> There is no generic function to translate an OPP to FREQ and vice versa.
> Came across the problem while trying to submit a follow-up to earlier
> patch for change in mpurate via bootargs. 
>
> The function get_opp in resource34xx.c, but it is always called with an
> explicit addition of MAX_VDDn_OPP e.g.
>
>   opp = get_opp(mpu_opps + MAX_VDD1_OPP, clk->rate);
>   opp = get_opp(l3_opps + MAX_VDD2_OPP, clk->rate);
>
> This is 'addition' is required as there is no encapsulation of the
> MIN and MAX VDDs associated to the table.
>
> The patch below fixes this issue; buy creating a 'table' object with
> necessary information. It can also help in getting rid of the
> empty {0, 0, 0} at index 0 of each OPP table.
>
> At the moment, it does not break any functionality in resource34xx.c;
> migration to this encapsulation can be taken as next step.
>
> This code is bare 'git-diff' for early comments. Formal patch to follow...
>
> Best regards,
> Sanjeev

Is the goal of the min and max fields so you could have some OPPs
in the table that aren't valid for some SoCs?  IOW, the 'max' value
might be higher on newer SoCs with higher OPPs.

What if you want a list of OPPs, but want to remove one from the
middle of the list?  The min/max approach doesn't work here.

What about a also extending the struct omap_opp to have some sort of
valid field.

Kevin

>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h 
> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
> index 583e540..2357784 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ struct omap_opp {
> u16 vsel;
>  };
>  
> +/* struct omap_opp_table - View OPP table as an object
> + * @min: Minimum OPP id
> + * @max: Maximim OPP id
> + * @opps: Pointer to array defining the OPPs.
> + *
> + * An OPP table has varied length. Knowing minimum and maximum
> + * OPP ids allow easy traversal.
> + */
> +struct omap_opp_table {
> +   u8  min;
> +   u8  max;
> +   struct omap_opp* opps;
> +};
> +
>  extern struct omap_opp *mpu_opps;
>  extern struct omap_opp *dsp_opps;
>  extern struct omap_opp *l3_opps;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> index fec7d00..c90b1af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include 
>  #include 
>  #include 
> +#include 
>  
>  #include "prm-regbits-34xx.h"
>  #include "pm.h"
> @@ -281,3 +282,50 @@ static int __init omap_pm_init(void)
> return error;
>  }
>  late_initcall(omap_pm_init);
> +
> +/*
> + * Get frequency corresponding to an OPP
> + */
> +int opp_to_freq(unsigned int* freq, struct omap_opp_table* table, u8 opp)
> +{
> +int i, found=0;
> +
> +if (table && table->opps) {
> +for (i=table->min;  table->opps[i].opp_id <= table->max; i++)
> +if (table->opps[i].opp_id == opp) {
> +found = 1;
> +break;
> +}
> +
> +if (found) {
> +*freq = table->opps[i].rate;
> +return 1;
> +}
> +}
> +
> +return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Get OPP corresponding to a frequency
> + */
> +int freq_to_opp(u8* opp, struct omap_opp_table* table, unsigned long freq)
> +{
> +int i, found=0;
> +
> +if (table && table->opps) {
> +for (i=table->min;  table->opps[i].opp_id <= table->max; i++)
> +if (table->opps[i].rate == freq) {
> +found = 1;
> +break;
> +}
> +
> +if (found) {
> +*opp = table->opps[i].opp_id;
> +return 1;
> +}
> +}
> +
> +return 0;
> +}
> +
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[RFC] OMAP3 : PM : Handle variable length OPP tables

2009-09-07 Thread Premi, Sanjeev
Hi all,

There is no generic function to translate an OPP to FREQ and vice versa.
Came across the problem while trying to submit a follow-up to earlier
patch for change in mpurate via bootargs. 

The function get_opp in resource34xx.c, but it is always called with an
explicit addition of MAX_VDDn_OPP e.g.

  opp = get_opp(mpu_opps + MAX_VDD1_OPP, clk->rate);
  opp = get_opp(l3_opps + MAX_VDD2_OPP, clk->rate);

This is 'addition' is required as there is no encapsulation of the
MIN and MAX VDDs associated to the table.

The patch below fixes this issue; buy creating a 'table' object with
necessary information. It can also help in getting rid of the
empty {0, 0, 0} at index 0 of each OPP table.

At the moment, it does not break any functionality in resource34xx.c;
migration to this encapsulation can be taken as next step.

This code is bare 'git-diff' for early comments. Formal patch to follow...

Best regards,
Sanjeev

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h 
b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
index 583e540..2357784 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/mach/omap-pm.h
@@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ struct omap_opp {
u16 vsel;
 };
 
+/* struct omap_opp_table - View OPP table as an object
+ * @min: Minimum OPP id
+ * @max: Maximim OPP id
+ * @opps: Pointer to array defining the OPPs.
+ *
+ * An OPP table has varied length. Knowing minimum and maximum
+ * OPP ids allow easy traversal.
+ */
+struct omap_opp_table {
+   u8  min;
+   u8  max;
+   struct omap_opp* opps;
+};
+
 extern struct omap_opp *mpu_opps;
 extern struct omap_opp *dsp_opps;
 extern struct omap_opp *l3_opps;
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
index fec7d00..c90b1af 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 
 #include "prm-regbits-34xx.h"
 #include "pm.h"
@@ -281,3 +282,50 @@ static int __init omap_pm_init(void)
return error;
 }
 late_initcall(omap_pm_init);
+
+/*
+ * Get frequency corresponding to an OPP
+ */
+int opp_to_freq(unsigned int* freq, struct omap_opp_table* table, u8 opp)
+{
+int i, found=0;
+
+if (table && table->opps) {
+for (i=table->min;  table->opps[i].opp_id <= table->max; i++)
+if (table->opps[i].opp_id == opp) {
+found = 1;
+break;
+}
+
+if (found) {
+*freq = table->opps[i].rate;
+return 1;
+}
+}
+
+return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Get OPP corresponding to a frequency
+ */
+int freq_to_opp(u8* opp, struct omap_opp_table* table, unsigned long freq)
+{
+int i, found=0;
+
+if (table && table->opps) {
+for (i=table->min;  table->opps[i].opp_id <= table->max; i++)
+if (table->opps[i].rate == freq) {
+found = 1;
+break;
+}
+
+if (found) {
+*opp = table->opps[i].opp_id;
+return 1;
+}
+}
+
+return 0;
+}
+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html