Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 43/51] DMA-API: dma: edma.c: no need to explicitly initialize DMA masks

2013-09-23 Thread Vinod Koul
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:15:39AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
 register_platform_device_full() can setup the DMA mask provided the
 appropriate member is set in struct platform_device_info.  So lets
 make that be the case.  This avoids a direct reference to the DMA
 masks by this driver.
 
 Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
Acked-by: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com

This also brings me question that should we force the driver to use the
dma_set_mask_and_coherent() API or they have below flexiblity too?

~Vinod

 ---
  drivers/dma/edma.c |6 ++
  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
 index ff50ff4..7f9fe30 100644
 --- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
 +++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
 @@ -702,11 +702,13 @@ static struct platform_device *pdev0, *pdev1;
  static const struct platform_device_info edma_dev_info0 = {
   .name = edma-dma-engine,
   .id = 0,
 + .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
  };
  
  static const struct platform_device_info edma_dev_info1 = {
   .name = edma-dma-engine,
   .id = 1,
 + .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
  };


  
  static int edma_init(void)
 @@ -720,8 +722,6 @@ static int edma_init(void)
   ret = PTR_ERR(pdev0);
   goto out;
   }
 - pdev0-dev.dma_mask = pdev0-dev.coherent_dma_mask;
 - pdev0-dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
   }
  
   if (EDMA_CTLRS == 2) {
 @@ -731,8 +731,6 @@ static int edma_init(void)
   platform_device_unregister(pdev0);
   ret = PTR_ERR(pdev1);
   }
 - pdev1-dev.dma_mask = pdev1-dev.coherent_dma_mask;
 - pdev1-dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
   }
  
  out:
 -- 
 1.7.4.4
 
 ___
 Alsa-devel mailing list
 alsa-de...@alsa-project.org
 http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 43/51] DMA-API: dma: edma.c: no need to explicitly initialize DMA masks

2013-09-23 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 03:55:33PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:15:39AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
  register_platform_device_full() can setup the DMA mask provided the
  appropriate member is set in struct platform_device_info.  So lets
  make that be the case.  This avoids a direct reference to the DMA
  masks by this driver.
  
  Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
 Acked-by: Vinod Koul vinod.k...@intel.com
 
 This also brings me question that should we force the driver to use the
 dma_set_mask_and_coherent() API or they have below flexiblity too?

There's two issues here:
1. dma_set_mask_and_coherent() will only work if dev-dma_mask points at
   some storage for the mask.  This needs to have .dma_mask in the
   platform_device_info initialised.

2. Yes, this driver should also be calling the appropriate DMA mask setting
   functions in addition to having the mask initialized at device creation
   time.

Here's a replacement patch, though maybe it would be better to roll all
the additions of dma_set_mask_and_coherent() in drivers/dma into one
patch?  In other words, combine the addition of this with these two
patches:

dma: pl330: add dma_set_mask_and_coherent() call
dma: pl08x: add dma_set_mask_and_coherent() call

8=
From: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] DMA-API: dma: edma.c: no need to explicitly initialize DMA
 masks

register_platform_device_full() can setup the DMA mask provided the
appropriate member is set in struct platform_device_info.  So lets
make that be the case.  This avoids a direct reference to the DMA
masks by this driver.

While here, add the dma_set_mask_and_coherent() call which the DMA API
requires DMA-using drivers to call.

Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
---
 drivers/dma/edma.c |   10 ++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/edma.c b/drivers/dma/edma.c
index ff50ff4..fd5e48c 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/edma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/edma.c
@@ -631,6 +631,10 @@ static int edma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct edma_cc *ecc;
int ret;
 
+   ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(pdev-dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
+   if (ret)
+   return ret;
+
ecc = devm_kzalloc(pdev-dev, sizeof(*ecc), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ecc) {
dev_err(pdev-dev, Can't allocate controller\n);
@@ -702,11 +706,13 @@ static struct platform_device *pdev0, *pdev1;
 static const struct platform_device_info edma_dev_info0 = {
.name = edma-dma-engine,
.id = 0,
+   .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
 };
 
 static const struct platform_device_info edma_dev_info1 = {
.name = edma-dma-engine,
.id = 1,
+   .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
 };
 
 static int edma_init(void)
@@ -720,8 +726,6 @@ static int edma_init(void)
ret = PTR_ERR(pdev0);
goto out;
}
-   pdev0-dev.dma_mask = pdev0-dev.coherent_dma_mask;
-   pdev0-dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
}
 
if (EDMA_CTLRS == 2) {
@@ -731,8 +735,6 @@ static int edma_init(void)
platform_device_unregister(pdev0);
ret = PTR_ERR(pdev1);
}
-   pdev1-dev.dma_mask = pdev1-dev.coherent_dma_mask;
-   pdev1-dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
}
 
 out:
-- 
1.7.4.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html