Re: DSS2 and 2.6.36

2010-11-22 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Grant Erickson  wrote:
> I have a Mistral AM37x development board and am working on transitioning it 
> from the 2.6.32 provided with the SDK to 2.6.36 and have run into some issues 
> with the OMAP2 DSS driver that it seems others have encountered as well (e.g. 
> "DSS2 broken with 36-rc1"  "[PATCH 1/2] video: omap: vram: remove from normal memory" 
> ).
>
> Is 2.6.37-rcY the preferred canonical tree to fast-forward to pick up the 
> remap/allocation/reserve changes for this or is there another preferred tree 
> (e.g. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git 
> or git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git)?

2.6.36 should work fine, but you need to configure the amount of VRAM
to reserve: CONFIG_OMAP2_VRAM_SIZE=6, or something like that. Previous
methods (board, omap.vram boot param) don't work any more AFAIK.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: DSS2 and 2.6.36

2010-11-22 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Grant Erickson
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:35 PM
> To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: DSS2 and 2.6.36
> 
> I have a Mistral AM37x development board and am working on transitioning
> it from the 2.6.32 provided with the SDK to 2.6.36 and have run into some
> issues with the OMAP2 DSS driver that it seems others have encountered as
> well (e.g. "DSS2 broken with 36-rc1"

[Hiremath, Vaibhav] Are you using 2.6.36 stable version or 2.6.36-rcX? I would 
suggest you to use latest kernel, I started using 2.6.36 stable version and it 
is working fine for me.

Thanks,
Vaibhav

> <http://marc.info/?t=12819629504&r=1&w=2 and "[PATCH 1/2] video: omap:
> vram: remove from normal memory"
> <http://marc.info/?t=12871470534&r=1&w=2>).
> 
> Is 2.6.37-rcY the preferred canonical tree to fast-forward to pick up the
> remap/allocation/reserve changes for this or is there another preferred
> tree (e.g. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-
> omap-2.6.git or git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git)?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Grant
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


DSS2 and 2.6.36

2010-11-12 Thread Grant Erickson
I have a Mistral AM37x development board and am working on transitioning it 
from the 2.6.32 provided with the SDK to 2.6.36 and have run into some issues 
with the OMAP2 DSS driver that it seems others have encountered as well (e.g. 
"DSS2 broken with 36-rc1" ).

Is 2.6.37-rcY the preferred canonical tree to fast-forward to pick up the 
remap/allocation/reserve changes for this or is there another preferred tree 
(e.g. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git 
or git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git)?

Best,

Grant


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html