Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: add IRQ trigger support
* Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org [090612 22:31]: On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:32:51 -0500 Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com wrote: There is currently no provision for passing IRQ trigger flags for serial IRQs with triggering requirements (such as GPIO IRQs.) This patch adds UPF_IRQ_TRIG_* flags which map on to IRQF_TRIGGER_* flags. Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com Acked-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com Note that this patch doesn't allow the interrupt to trigger on both edges (not that I have ever seen a 8250 with this behavior, but this is a valid configuration from an interrupt point of view). To me it sounds like the it would be better to have unsigned long irqflags in struct uart_port instead of trying to squeeze the irqflags the flags field. We're already not covering all the irqflags currently like Marc pointed out. Regards, Tony Aside from this remark: Acked-by: Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org --- drivers/serial/8250.c | 10 ++ include/linux/serial_core.h |4 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/serial/8250.c b/drivers/serial/8250.c index bab115e..8235ef5 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/8250.c +++ b/drivers/serial/8250.c @@ -1641,6 +1641,16 @@ static int serial_link_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up) struct irq_info *i; int ret, irq_flags = up-port.flags UPF_SHARE_IRQ ? IRQF_SHARED : 0; + /* Get IRQ Trigger Flag */ + if (up-port.flags UPF_IRQ_TRIG_RISING) + irq_flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING; + else if (up-port.flags UPF_IRQ_TRIG_FALLING) + irq_flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING; + else if (up-port.flags UPF_IRQ_TRIG_HIGH) + irq_flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH; + else if (up-port.flags UPF_IRQ_TRIG_LOW) + irq_flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW; + mutex_lock(hash_mutex); h = irq_lists[up-port.irq % NR_IRQ_HASH]; diff --git a/include/linux/serial_core.h b/include/linux/serial_core.h index 57a97e5..07591d5 100644 --- a/include/linux/serial_core.h +++ b/include/linux/serial_core.h @@ -296,7 +296,11 @@ struct uart_port { #define UPF_SPD_WARP ((__force upf_t) (0x1010)) #define UPF_SKIP_TEST ((__force upf_t) (1 6)) #define UPF_AUTO_IRQ ((__force upf_t) (1 7)) +#define UPF_IRQ_TRIG_RISING((__force upf_t) (1 8)) +#define UPF_IRQ_TRIG_FALLING ((__force upf_t) (1 9)) +#define UPF_IRQ_TRIG_HIGH ((__force upf_t) (1 10)) #define UPF_HARDPPS_CD ((__force upf_t) (1 11)) +#define UPF_IRQ_TRIG_LOW ((__force upf_t) (1 12)) #define UPF_LOW_LATENCY((__force upf_t) (1 13)) #define UPF_BUGGY_UART ((__force upf_t) (1 14)) #define UPF_NO_TXEN_TEST ((__force upf_t) (1 15)) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: add IRQ trigger support
To me it sounds like the it would be better to have unsigned long irqflags in struct uart_port instead of trying to squeeze the irqflags the flags field. We're already not covering all the irqflags currently like Marc pointed out. Agreed. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH] serial: 8250: add IRQ trigger support
-Original Message- From: Alan Cox [mailto:a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk] Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 8:24 AM To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Marc Zyngier; Pandita, Vikram; linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux- o...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: add IRQ trigger support To me it sounds like the it would be better to have unsigned long irqflags in struct uart_port instead of trying to squeeze the irqflags the flags field. We're already not covering all the irqflags currently like Marc pointed out. Agreed. I can post a patch with new irqflags in uart_port. Expect a patch today. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: add IRQ trigger support
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:32:51 -0500 Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com wrote: There is currently no provision for passing IRQ trigger flags for serial IRQs with triggering requirements (such as GPIO IRQs.) This patch adds UPF_IRQ_TRIG_* flags which map on to IRQF_TRIGGER_* flags. Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita vikram.pand...@ti.com Acked-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com Note that this patch doesn't allow the interrupt to trigger on both edges (not that I have ever seen a 8250 with this behavior, but this is a valid configuration from an interrupt point of view). Aside from this remark: Acked-by: Marc Zyngier m...@misterjones.org --- drivers/serial/8250.c | 10 ++ include/linux/serial_core.h |4 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/serial/8250.c b/drivers/serial/8250.c index bab115e..8235ef5 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/8250.c +++ b/drivers/serial/8250.c @@ -1641,6 +1641,16 @@ static int serial_link_irq_chain(struct uart_8250_port *up) struct irq_info *i; int ret, irq_flags = up-port.flags UPF_SHARE_IRQ ? IRQF_SHARED : 0; + /* Get IRQ Trigger Flag */ + if (up-port.flags UPF_IRQ_TRIG_RISING) + irq_flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING; + else if (up-port.flags UPF_IRQ_TRIG_FALLING) + irq_flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING; + else if (up-port.flags UPF_IRQ_TRIG_HIGH) + irq_flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH; + else if (up-port.flags UPF_IRQ_TRIG_LOW) + irq_flags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW; + mutex_lock(hash_mutex); h = irq_lists[up-port.irq % NR_IRQ_HASH]; diff --git a/include/linux/serial_core.h b/include/linux/serial_core.h index 57a97e5..07591d5 100644 --- a/include/linux/serial_core.h +++ b/include/linux/serial_core.h @@ -296,7 +296,11 @@ struct uart_port { #define UPF_SPD_WARP ((__force upf_t) (0x1010)) #define UPF_SKIP_TEST((__force upf_t) (1 6)) #define UPF_AUTO_IRQ ((__force upf_t) (1 7)) +#define UPF_IRQ_TRIG_RISING ((__force upf_t) (1 8)) +#define UPF_IRQ_TRIG_FALLING ((__force upf_t) (1 9)) +#define UPF_IRQ_TRIG_HIGH((__force upf_t) (1 10)) #define UPF_HARDPPS_CD ((__force upf_t) (1 11)) +#define UPF_IRQ_TRIG_LOW ((__force upf_t) (1 12)) #define UPF_LOW_LATENCY ((__force upf_t) (1 13)) #define UPF_BUGGY_UART ((__force upf_t) (1 14)) #define UPF_NO_TXEN_TEST ((__force upf_t) (1 15)) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html