Re: [CFT 11/11] Add feature removal of old OMAP private DMA implementation
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 01:37:11PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On 06/07/2012 06:09 AM, Russell King wrote: > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > > --- > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++ > > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > index 56000b3..1f7ba35 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > @@ -612,3 +612,14 @@ When: June 2013 > > Why: Unsupported/unmaintained/unused since 2.6 > > > > > > + > > +What: OMAP private DMA implementation > > +When: 2013 > > +Why: We have a DMA engine implementation; all users should be updated > > + to use this rather than persisting with the old APIs. The old APIs > > + block merging the old DMA engine implementation into the DMA > > + engine driver. > > +Who: Russell King , > > + Santosh Shilimkar > > + > > + > > Whose tree do feature-removal-schedule patches go in through? > > (They're not really documentation, they're design coordination/logistics.) I don't think there is any specific tree. It would also be silly to split it from this patch set; if it were to be split, and there would need to be coordination with the rest of the patch set to ensure this change didn't go in without the rest - that would not make sense. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [CFT 11/11] Add feature removal of old OMAP private DMA implementation
On 06/07/2012 06:09 AM, Russell King wrote: > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > Signed-off-by: Russell King > --- > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > index 56000b3..1f7ba35 100644 > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > @@ -612,3 +612,14 @@ When:June 2013 > Why: Unsupported/unmaintained/unused since 2.6 > > > + > +What:OMAP private DMA implementation > +When:2013 > +Why: We have a DMA engine implementation; all users should be updated > + to use this rather than persisting with the old APIs. The old APIs > + block merging the old DMA engine implementation into the DMA > + engine driver. > +Who: Russell King , > + Santosh Shilimkar > + > + Whose tree do feature-removal-schedule patches go in through? (They're not really documentation, they're design coordination/logistics.) Rob -- GNU/Linux isn't: Linux=GPLv2, GNU=GPLv3+, they can't share code. Either it's "mere aggregation", or a license violation. Pick one. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [CFT 11/11] Add feature removal of old OMAP private DMA implementation
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Russell King wrote: > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > Signed-off-by: Russell King > --- > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > index 56000b3..1f7ba35 100644 > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > @@ -612,3 +612,14 @@ When: June 2013 > Why: Unsupported/unmaintained/unused since 2.6 > > > + > +What: OMAP private DMA implementation > +When: 2013 > +Why: We have a DMA engine implementation; all users should be updated > + to use this rather than persisting with the old APIs. The old APIs > + block merging the old DMA engine implementation into the DMA > + engine driver. > +Who: Russell King , > + Santosh Shilimkar > + > + > -- Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [CFT 11/11] Add feature removal of old OMAP private DMA implementation
* Russell King [120607 04:14]: > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > Signed-off-by: Russell King Acked-by: Tony Lindgren > --- > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > index 56000b3..1f7ba35 100644 > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > @@ -612,3 +612,14 @@ When:June 2013 > Why: Unsupported/unmaintained/unused since 2.6 > > > + > +What:OMAP private DMA implementation > +When:2013 > +Why: We have a DMA engine implementation; all users should be updated > + to use this rather than persisting with the old APIs. The old APIs > + block merging the old DMA engine implementation into the DMA > + engine driver. > +Who: Russell King , > + Santosh Shilimkar > + > + > -- > 1.7.4.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
