Re: [PATCH 00/09] OMAP:GPIO:Implement GPIO in HWMOD way

2010-05-11 Thread Kevin Hilman
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:

 * Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com [100510 08:09]:
 Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
 
  * Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com [100506 23:52]:
  Tony/ Kevin,
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Varadarajan, Charulatha
   Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:25 PM
   To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
   Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; p...@pwsan.com; t...@atomide.com;
   khil...@deeprootsystems.com; Varadarajan, Charulatha
   Subject: [PATCH 00/09] OMAP:GPIO:Implement GPIO in HWMOD way
   
   This patch series implements GPIO as an early platform driver.
   It makes OMAP2PLUS specific GPIO to get adapted to HWMOD FW.
   OMAP1 specific GPIO is implemented as early platform device.
   
   This patch series is created on origin/pm-wip/hwmods. 
  
  Planning to send few more patches for adapting some other
  drivers to HWMOD FW. 
  Which tree should those patches be created on?
  LO mainline? or hwmods branch? or runtime branch?
 
  All the patches should be against the most recent tag
  in Linus' mainline tree, currently v2.6.34-rc6.
 
  If there are some dependencies to other patches, we need
  to get those upstream immediately.
 
 Please use pm-wip/runtime, which is currently based on v2.6.34-rc6
 + PM changes already submitted for 2.6.35 (3 patches)

 That's for the few more patches for adapting some other drivers,
 not for the GPIO patches, right?

 AFAIK, the GPIO patches should not have dependencies to the pm-wip.

Basing on pm-wip/runtime is for a couple reasons, but the most
important is to avoid conflicts in the hwmod data files.  Since all the
hwmods are in the same file, it makes it easy for me to track them
if they apply onto existing hwmods.

 Kevin, let me know if you got some things ready to go that can
 be pulled into omap-for-linus.

Nothing yet for hwmod.  The stuff that's mostly done is UART + MMC,
but those both still need validation on OMAP2 and OMAP4.

 In addition, this has the in-progress UART + MMC hwmod changes.

 Sounds like those are not ready to go yet then. So I guess it's
 currently only your pm-next that's ready to go?

I've submitted PM core stuff in pm-next and I've also submitted some
GPIO changes for 2.6.35.

I have a few more things to add to pm-next, and I'll be doing that
today.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 00/09] OMAP:GPIO:Implement GPIO in HWMOD way

2010-05-10 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com [100510 08:09]:
 Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
 
  * Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com [100506 23:52]:
  Tony/ Kevin,
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Varadarajan, Charulatha
   Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:25 PM
   To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
   Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; p...@pwsan.com; t...@atomide.com;
   khil...@deeprootsystems.com; Varadarajan, Charulatha
   Subject: [PATCH 00/09] OMAP:GPIO:Implement GPIO in HWMOD way
   
   This patch series implements GPIO as an early platform driver.
   It makes OMAP2PLUS specific GPIO to get adapted to HWMOD FW.
   OMAP1 specific GPIO is implemented as early platform device.
   
   This patch series is created on origin/pm-wip/hwmods. 
  
  Planning to send few more patches for adapting some other
  drivers to HWMOD FW. 
  Which tree should those patches be created on?
  LO mainline? or hwmods branch? or runtime branch?
 
  All the patches should be against the most recent tag
  in Linus' mainline tree, currently v2.6.34-rc6.
 
  If there are some dependencies to other patches, we need
  to get those upstream immediately.
 
 Please use pm-wip/runtime, which is currently based on v2.6.34-rc6
 + PM changes already submitted for 2.6.35 (3 patches)

That's for the few more patches for adapting some other drivers,
not for the GPIO patches, right?

AFAIK, the GPIO patches should not have dependencies to the pm-wip.

Kevin, let me know if you got some things ready to go that can
be pulled into omap-for-linus.

 In addition, this has the in-progress UART + MMC hwmod changes.

Sounds like those are not ready to go yet then. So I guess it's
currently only your pm-next that's ready to go?

Cheers,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH 00/09] OMAP:GPIO:Implement GPIO in HWMOD way

2010-05-07 Thread Varadarajan, Charulatha
Tony/ Kevin,

 -Original Message-
 From: Varadarajan, Charulatha
 Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:25 PM
 To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; p...@pwsan.com; t...@atomide.com;
 khil...@deeprootsystems.com; Varadarajan, Charulatha
 Subject: [PATCH 00/09] OMAP:GPIO:Implement GPIO in HWMOD way
 
 This patch series implements GPIO as an early platform driver.
 It makes OMAP2PLUS specific GPIO to get adapted to HWMOD FW.
 OMAP1 specific GPIO is implemented as early platform device.
 
 This patch series is created on origin/pm-wip/hwmods. 

Planning to send few more patches for adapting some other
drivers to HWMOD FW. 
Which tree should those patches be created on?
LO mainline? or hwmods branch? or runtime branch?

-V Charulatha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 00/09] OMAP:GPIO:Implement GPIO in HWMOD way

2010-05-07 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Varadarajan, Charulatha ch...@ti.com [100506 23:52]:
 Tony/ Kevin,
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Varadarajan, Charulatha
  Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:25 PM
  To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
  Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; p...@pwsan.com; t...@atomide.com;
  khil...@deeprootsystems.com; Varadarajan, Charulatha
  Subject: [PATCH 00/09] OMAP:GPIO:Implement GPIO in HWMOD way
  
  This patch series implements GPIO as an early platform driver.
  It makes OMAP2PLUS specific GPIO to get adapted to HWMOD FW.
  OMAP1 specific GPIO is implemented as early platform device.
  
  This patch series is created on origin/pm-wip/hwmods. 
 
 Planning to send few more patches for adapting some other
 drivers to HWMOD FW. 
 Which tree should those patches be created on?
 LO mainline? or hwmods branch? or runtime branch?

All the patches should be against the most recent tag
in Linus' mainline tree, currently v2.6.34-rc6.

If there are some dependencies to other patches, we need
to get those upstream immediately.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html