Re: [PATCH 18/33] pcmcia: sa1100: provide generic CF support

2016-09-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Russell King
 wrote:

> Provide generic non-voltage sensing socket support for StrongARM
> platforms using the gpiolib and regulator subsystems to obtain the
> resources to control the socket.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King 
(...)

> +static int sa11x0_drv_pcmcia_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +   struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt;
> +   struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> +   if (dev->id == -1)
> +   return sa11x0_drv_pcmcia_legacy_probe(pdev);

There is a typo there, it should be pdev->id rather than dev->id.

After fixing this, my legacy h3600 PCMCIA started probing again.

(It revealed another bug in fetching GPIOs but it is an orthogobal
problem altogether, looking into it.)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

___
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia


Re: [PATCH 18/33] pcmcia: sa1100: provide generic CF support

2016-09-14 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:52:39AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Russell King
>  wrote:
> 
> > Provide generic non-voltage sensing socket support for StrongARM
> > platforms using the gpiolib and regulator subsystems to obtain the
> > resources to control the socket.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King 
> (...)
> 
> > +static int sa11x0_drv_pcmcia_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +   struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt;
> > +   struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +
> > +   if (dev->id == -1)
> > +   return sa11x0_drv_pcmcia_legacy_probe(pdev);
> 
> There is a typo there, it should be pdev->id rather than dev->id.
> 
> After fixing this, my legacy h3600 PCMCIA started probing again.

Thanks, I've included a change there, should be part of the branch by
the time you get this email - sa1100 head should be 9ad0f8181616.  If
not, it's probably still being pushed out over my slow 'net link.

> (It revealed another bug in fetching GPIOs but it is an orthogobal
> problem altogether, looking into it.)

If you're referring to the generic sa1100 pcmcia code, there's a fix
for that already in my branch.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

___
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia


Re: [PATCH 05/33] gpio: add generic single-register fixed-direction GPIO driver

2016-09-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Linus Walleij  wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>  wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 11:06:28AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> I couldn't resist testing on the Compaq iPAQ h3600. It works the
>>> same as before so:
>>> Tested-by: Linus Walleij  [for Compaq iPAQ H3600]
>>
>> Great news.  I've been thinking about digging out my h3600, but it's
>> very old, and hasn't been turned on for many years.  I'm not sure what
>> state it's in.
>>
>> I've been hoping to try booting some kernels with qemu-system-arm, but
>> so far I've completely failed to get qemu-system-arm to do anything
>> useful - it just sits there doing apparently nothing, irrespective of
>> which platform I choose or which kernel I give it.
>>
>>> The only news in the bootlog is this:
>>> sa11x0-pcmcia: probe of sa11x0-pcmcia failed with error -2
>>
>> Not so great news - that's -ENOENT.  Did that happen before these
>> changes?  That could be that the gpiod lookup table isn't found.
>> However, if that were the case, I'd have expected an error message
>> along the lines of:
>>
>> Failed to get GPIO for xxx: -nnn
>>
>> from soc_pcmcia_request_gpiods().  The other possibility is that
>> we're not getting to sa11x0_drv_pcmcia_legacy_probe() but instead
>> trying to initialise it as a generic sa11x0 socket, and
>> sa11x0_pcmcia_hw_init() is failing as a result.
>>
>> We should be using the legacy probe on H3600, so sa11x0_pcmcia_hw_init()
>> should never be reached.
>
> However that is what happens, this is my callstack after
> adding some prints:
>
> sa11x0_pcmcia_init
> sa11x0_drv_pcmcia_probe
> soc_pcmcia_init_one
> soc_pcmcia_add_one
> soc_pcmcia_hw_init
> sa11x0_pcmcia_hw_init
> soc_pcmcia_add_one: pcmcia HW init failed
> sa11x0-pcmcia: probe of sa11x0-pcmcia failed with error -2

Bah I found the cause, just a simple oneliner typo in one of
the patches. I will comment on the patch in question so you can
fix it up on your branch.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

___
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia


Re: [PATCH 18/33] pcmcia: sa1100: provide generic CF support

2016-09-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
 wrote:

> Thanks, I've included a change there, should be part of the branch by
> the time you get this email - sa1100 head should be 9ad0f8181616.  If
> not, it's probably still being pushed out over my slow 'net link.

Thanks, fetched it and tested, this fix is there things work so far.

>> (It revealed another bug in fetching GPIOs but it is an orthogobal
>> problem altogether, looking into it.)
>
> If you're referring to the generic sa1100 pcmcia code, there's a fix
> for that already in my branch.

Unfortunately not, the bug is still there, I'll point it out in the relevant
patch, just need to do a boot test.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

___
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia


Re: [PATCH 10/33] pcmcia: soc_common: switch to using gpio_descs

2016-09-14 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Russell King
 wrote:

> Switch to using the gpiod_* consumer API rather than the legacy API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King 
(...)

> +int soc_pcmcia_request_gpiods(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt)
> +{
> +   int i;
> +
> +   for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(skt->stat); i++) {
> +   struct gpio_desc *desc;
> +

Here I inserted:

/* Skip over unnamed GPIOs, assume unused */
if (!skt->stat[i].name)
continue;

to get it working again on h3600.

> +   desc = gpiod_get(skt->socket.dev.parent,
> +skt->stat[i].name, GPIOD_IN);
> +   if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
> +   dev_err(skt->socket.dev.parent,
> +   "Failed to get GPIO for %s: %ld\n",
> +   skt->stat[i].name, PTR_ERR(desc));
> +   __soc_pcmcia_hw_shutdown(skt, i);
> +   return PTR_ERR(desc);
> +   }


It bugs out for me on the legacy h3600, since it only defines
two of these pins not all of the ARRAY_SIZE(skt->stat) pins
will succeed and we get an error message like this:

sa11x0-pcmcia sa11x0-pcmcia: Failed to get GPIO for (null): -2
sa11x0-pcmcia: probe of sa11x0-pcmcia failed with error -2

With the patch above it goes away and the log is silent.
The debugfs gpio file looks like this:

cat gpio
gpiochip0: GPIOs 0-27, gpio:
 gpio-0   (|Power Button) in  hi
 gpio-10  (|pcmcia1-detect  ) in  hi
 gpio-11  (|pcmcia1-ready   ) in  hi
 gpio-17  (|pcmcia0-detect  ) in  hi
 gpio-18  (|Action button   ) in  hi
 gpio-21  (|pcmcia0-ready   ) in  hi
 gpio-23  (|dcd ) in  hi
 gpio-25  (|cts ) in  lo
 gpio-26  (|rts ) out lo

gpiochip1: GPIOs 28-43, parent: platform/htc-egpio, htc-egpio:
 gpio-28  (|Flash Vpp   ) out lo
 gpio-29  (|PCMCIA CARD RESET   ) out lo
 gpio-30  (|OPT RESET   ) out lo
 gpio-32  (|OPT NVRAM ON) out lo
 gpio-33  (|OPT ON  ) out lo
 gpio-34  (|LCD power   ) out lo
 gpio-36  (|LCD control ) out lo
 gpio-42  (|LCD 5v  ) out lo
 gpio-43  (|LCD 9v/-6.5v) out lo

Which seems like before the patch series.

I still suspect the PCMCIA is not really working but I have
limited experience of the bus so I don't really know how
to test it deeply or have my PCMCIA ethernet or harddrive
probe properly.

There are no regressions however, so with something like
the above patch applied:
Tested-by: Linus Walleij 

For the whole patch series on H3600.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

___
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia


Re: [PATCH 10/33] pcmcia: soc_common: switch to using gpio_descs

2016-09-14 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 01:29:04PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Russell King
>  wrote:
> 
> > Switch to using the gpiod_* consumer API rather than the legacy API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King 
> (...)
> 
> > +int soc_pcmcia_request_gpiods(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt)
> > +{
> > +   int i;
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(skt->stat); i++) {
> > +   struct gpio_desc *desc;
> > +
> 
> Here I inserted:
> 
> /* Skip over unnamed GPIOs, assume unused */
> if (!skt->stat[i].name)
> continue;
> 
> to get it working again on h3600.

Thanks, I'll add that.

> > +   desc = gpiod_get(skt->socket.dev.parent,
> > +skt->stat[i].name, GPIOD_IN);
> > +   if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
> > +   dev_err(skt->socket.dev.parent,
> > +   "Failed to get GPIO for %s: %ld\n",
> > +   skt->stat[i].name, PTR_ERR(desc));
> > +   __soc_pcmcia_hw_shutdown(skt, i);
> > +   return PTR_ERR(desc);
> > +   }
> 
> 
> It bugs out for me on the legacy h3600, since it only defines
> two of these pins not all of the ARRAY_SIZE(skt->stat) pins
> will succeed and we get an error message like this:
> 
> sa11x0-pcmcia sa11x0-pcmcia: Failed to get GPIO for (null): -2
> sa11x0-pcmcia: probe of sa11x0-pcmcia failed with error -2
> 
> With the patch above it goes away and the log is silent.
> The debugfs gpio file looks like this:
> 
> cat gpio
> gpiochip0: GPIOs 0-27, gpio:
>  gpio-0   (|Power Button) in  hi
>  gpio-10  (|pcmcia1-detect  ) in  hi
>  gpio-11  (|pcmcia1-ready   ) in  hi
>  gpio-17  (|pcmcia0-detect  ) in  hi
>  gpio-18  (|Action button   ) in  hi
>  gpio-21  (|pcmcia0-ready   ) in  hi
>  gpio-23  (|dcd ) in  hi
>  gpio-25  (|cts ) in  lo
>  gpio-26  (|rts ) out lo
> 
> gpiochip1: GPIOs 28-43, parent: platform/htc-egpio, htc-egpio:
>  gpio-28  (|Flash Vpp   ) out lo
>  gpio-29  (|PCMCIA CARD RESET   ) out lo
>  gpio-30  (|OPT RESET   ) out lo
>  gpio-32  (|OPT NVRAM ON) out lo
>  gpio-33  (|OPT ON  ) out lo
>  gpio-34  (|LCD power   ) out lo
>  gpio-36  (|LCD control ) out lo
>  gpio-42  (|LCD 5v  ) out lo
>  gpio-43  (|LCD 9v/-6.5v) out lo
> 
> Which seems like before the patch series.

Yay.

> I still suspect the PCMCIA is not really working but I have
> limited experience of the bus so I don't really know how
> to test it deeply or have my PCMCIA ethernet or harddrive
> probe properly.

Yes, to me the H3600 code looks really really really weird - the way
H3XXX_EGPIO_CARD_RESET is "shared" (badly) between both sockets is
certainly racy.  I've no idea what the semantics there are supposed
to be - I suspect that H3600 PCMCIA hasn't worked for a very long
time, or if it has, it's probably not been reliable.

> There are no regressions however, so with something like
> the above patch applied:
> Tested-by: Linus Walleij 
> 
> For the whole patch series on H3600.

Thanks!

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

___
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia