Signed-off-by: Jim Schutt jasc...@sandia.gov
---
opensm/osm_torus.c | 24
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/osm_torus.c b/opensm/osm_torus.c
index 29c1bb4..47654ce 100644
--- a/opensm/osm_torus.c
+++ b/opensm/osm_torus.c
@@ -856,9 +856,6 @@ bool parse_port(unsigned *pnum, const char *parse_sep)
if (!val)
return false;
*pnum = strtoul(val, nextchar, 0);
- if (*pnum IB_NODE_NUM_PORTS_MAX) {
- *pnum = 0;
- }
return true;
}
@@ -7018,7 +7015,8 @@ static
bool verify_setup(struct torus *t, struct fabric *f)
{
struct coord_dirs *o;
- unsigned n = 0;
+ struct f_switch *sw;
+ unsigned p, s, n = 0;
bool success = false;
bool all_sw_present, need_seed = true;
@@ -7044,6 +7042,24 @@ bool verify_setup(struct torus *t, struct fabric *f)
with two QoS levels (have %d need 8)\n,
(int)t-osm-subn.min_data_vls);
/*
+* Be sure all the switches in the torus support the port
+* ordering that might have been configured.
+*/
+ for (s = 0; s f-switch_cnt; s++) {
+ sw = f-sw[s];
+ for (p = 0; p sw-port_cnt; p++) {
+ if (t-port_order[p] = sw-port_cnt) {
+ OSM_LOG(t-osm-log, OSM_LOG_ERROR,
+ Error: port_order configured using
+ port %u, but only %u ports in
+ switch w/ GUID 0x%04PRIx64\n,
+ t-port_order[p], sw-port_cnt - 1,
+ cl_ntoh64(sw-n_id));
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ /*
* Unfortunately, there is a problem with non-unique topology for any
* torus dimension which has radix four. This problem requires extra
* input, in the form of specifying both the positive and negative
--
1.6.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
