Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()
From: Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 08:13:57 + Signed-off-by: Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk Applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:13:57AM +, Al Viro wrote: 9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) grr... 8 files changed, actually - that was from the diff that included mlx4 bits. Patch split correctly and sent in two pieces, summary left as is ;-/ Sorry about the confusion it might cause... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()
Acked-by: Eli Cohen e...@mellanox.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()
On 11/20/2014 10:17 AM, Al Viro wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:13:57AM +, Al Viro wrote: 9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) grr... 8 files changed, actually - that was from the diff that included mlx4 bits. Patch split correctly and sent in two pieces, summary left as is ;-/ Sorry about the confusion it might cause... Al, I think the best way to proceed here is to come up with mlx4 and mlx5 patches and get both of them in through netdev / net-nexttree, don't worry about each of these drivers have a part which is also under drivers/infiniband/hw -- it doesn't justify splitting in this case Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 07:09:31PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: On 11/20/2014 10:17 AM, Al Viro wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:13:57AM +, Al Viro wrote: 9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) grr... 8 files changed, actually - that was from the diff that included mlx4 bits. Patch split correctly and sent in two pieces, summary left as is ;-/ Sorry about the confusion it might cause... Al, I think the best way to proceed here is to come up with mlx4 and mlx5 patches and get both of them in through netdev / net-nexttree, don't worry about each of these drivers have a part which is also under drivers/infiniband/hw -- it doesn't justify splitting in this case Both had been sent to netdev today (and ACKed by respective drivers' maintainers). I'd certainly prefer not to put them through vfs.git, but beyond that I really don't care which tree do those go into... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html