Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()

2014-11-21 Thread David Miller
From: Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 08:13:57 +

 Signed-off-by: Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()

2014-11-20 Thread Al Viro
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:13:57AM +, Al Viro wrote:
  9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

grr... 8 files changed, actually - that was from the diff that included mlx4
bits.  Patch split correctly and sent in two pieces, summary left as is ;-/
Sorry about the confusion it might cause...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()

2014-11-20 Thread Eli Cohen
Acked-by: Eli Cohen e...@mellanox.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()

2014-11-20 Thread Or Gerlitz

On 11/20/2014 10:17 AM, Al Viro wrote:

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:13:57AM +, Al Viro wrote:

  9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

grr... 8 files changed, actually - that was from the diff that included mlx4
bits.  Patch split correctly and sent in two pieces, summary left as is ;-/
Sorry about the confusion it might cause...

Al,

I think the best way to proceed here is to come up with mlx4 and mlx5 
patches and get both of them in through netdev / net-nexttree, don't 
worry about each of these drivers have a part which is also under 
drivers/infiniband/hw -- it doesn't justify splitting in this case


Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: mlx5: don't duplicate kvfree()

2014-11-20 Thread Al Viro
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 07:09:31PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
 On 11/20/2014 10:17 AM, Al Viro wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:13:57AM +, Al Viro wrote:
   9 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
 grr... 8 files changed, actually - that was from the diff that included mlx4
 bits.  Patch split correctly and sent in two pieces, summary left as is ;-/
 Sorry about the confusion it might cause...
 Al,
 
 I think the best way to proceed here is to come up with mlx4 and
 mlx5 patches and get both of them in through netdev / net-nexttree,
 don't worry about each of these drivers have a part which is also
 under drivers/infiniband/hw -- it doesn't justify splitting in this
 case

Both had been sent to netdev today (and ACKed by respective drivers'
maintainers).  I'd certainly prefer not to put them through vfs.git,
but beyond that I really don't care which tree do those go into...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html