Re: opensm: Status of torus-2QoS patchset?

2010-02-27 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
On 09:29 Mon 22 Feb , Jim Schutt wrote:
 
 I'm happy to merge everything into a new series, and
 rebase to latest development head if you would prefer that.

Yes, that way it would be better. Thanks.

Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: opensm: Status of torus-2QoS patchset?

2010-02-22 Thread Jim Schutt

On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 04:43 -0700, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
 Hi Jim,
 
 On 13:34 Tue 16 Feb , Jim Schutt wrote:
  
  Do you have any feedback regarding my patches to add
  a new routing module specialized for 2D/3D torus topologies?
 
 I've started to look at this. There is a lot of code, so it takes a
 time. I will comment over patches.

Thanks - I know it's a lot of code, and I appreciate that
you don't want to add code until you understand how it
works.

 
  I was hoping there was some chance this work might make it
  into the OFED 1.6 release.
 
 1.6 is realistic.

Great.

Thanks again for taking a look.

-- Jim

 
 Sasha
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: opensm: Status of torus-2QoS patchset?

2010-02-22 Thread Jim Schutt

On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 04:58 -0700, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
 On 13:43 Sun 21 Feb , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
  
  I've started to look at this. There is a lot of code, so it takes a
  time. I will comment over patches.
 
 BTW, assuming that now we have three (0/11, 0/12 and 0/3) subsequent
 patch series (basic + reworks + fixes) wouldn't it be simpler for review
 and apply to merge everything into single final patch series?

I've been wondering which you prefer - I wasn't sure if
you wanted to preserve some of the patch history, particularly
for the bug fixes.

I'm happy to merge everything into a new series, and
rebase to latest development head if you would prefer that.

Please let me know.

-- Jim

 
 Sasha
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: opensm: Status of torus-2QoS patchset?

2010-02-21 Thread Sasha Khapyorsky
On 13:43 Sun 21 Feb , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
 
 I've started to look at this. There is a lot of code, so it takes a
 time. I will comment over patches.

BTW, assuming that now we have three (0/11, 0/12 and 0/3) subsequent
patch series (basic + reworks + fixes) wouldn't it be simpler for review
and apply to merge everything into single final patch series?

Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


opensm: Status of torus-2QoS patchset?

2010-02-16 Thread Jim Schutt
Hi Sasha,

Do you have any feedback regarding my patches to add
a new routing module specialized for 2D/3D torus topologies?
I was hoping there was some chance this work might make it
into the OFED 1.6 release.

Thanks -- Jim





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-rdma in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html