Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: fix vendor prefix for PCA9654

2017-11-30 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
 wrote:

> Despite commit 55020c8056a8 ("of: Add vendor prefix for ON Semiconductor
> Corp.") was made long ago, the latter commit 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x:
> add onsemi,pca9654 id") made use of another, undocumented vendor prefix.
> Since such prefix doesn't seem to be used in any device trees, I think we
> can just fix the "compatible" string in the driver and the bindings and be
> done with that...
>
> Fixes: 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x: add onsemi,pca9654 id")
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 

Patch applied with Rob's ACK.

Thanks for spotting this in time.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: fix vendor prefix for PCA9654

2017-11-20 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:18:32PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Despite commit 55020c8056a8 ("of: Add vendor prefix for ON Semiconductor
> Corp.") was made long ago, the latter commit 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x:
> add onsemi,pca9654 id") made use of another, undocumented vendor prefix.
> Since such prefix doesn't seem to be used in any device trees, I think we
> can just fix the "compatible" string in the driver and the bindings and be
> done with that...
> 
> Fixes: 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x: add onsemi,pca9654 id")
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> 
> ---
> The patch is against the 'fixes' branch of LinusW's 'linux-gpio.git' repo.
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca953x.txt |2 +-
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c |2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Rob Herring 


Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: fix vendor prefix for PCA9654

2017-11-20 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 01:47:04PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 12:06 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> > > Despite commit 55020c8056a8 ("of: Add vendor prefix for ON Semiconductor
> > > Corp.") was made long ago, the latter commit 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x:
> > > add onsemi,pca9654 id") made use of another, undocumented vendor prefix.
> > 
> > Ouch...
> > 
> > > Since such prefix doesn't seem to be used in any device trees, I think we
> > > can just fix the "compatible" string in the driver and the bindings and be
> > > done with that...
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x: add onsemi,pca9654 id")
> > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > The patch is against the 'fixes' branch of LinusW's 'linux-gpio.git' repo.
> > > 
> > >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca953x.txt |2 +-
> > >   drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c |2 +-
> > 
> > There's another (different) one in
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/idt_89hpesx.txt
> 
>Saw that. Do you think it also should be fixed (in this patch)?

IMO, separate.


Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: fix vendor prefix for PCA9654

2017-11-17 Thread Sergei Shtylyov

On 11/17/2017 12:06 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:


Despite commit 55020c8056a8 ("of: Add vendor prefix for ON Semiconductor
Corp.") was made long ago, the latter commit 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x:
add onsemi,pca9654 id") made use of another, undocumented vendor prefix.


Ouch...


Since such prefix doesn't seem to be used in any device trees, I think we
can just fix the "compatible" string in the driver and the bindings and be
done with that...

Fixes: 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x: add onsemi,pca9654 id")
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 

---
The patch is against the 'fixes' branch of LinusW's 'linux-gpio.git' repo.

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca953x.txt |2 +-
  drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c |2 +-


There's another (different) one in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/idt_89hpesx.txt


   Saw that. Do you think it also should be fixed (in this patch)?


Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

 Geert


MBR, Sergei


Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: fix vendor prefix for PCA9654

2017-11-17 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Sergei,

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
 wrote:
> Despite commit 55020c8056a8 ("of: Add vendor prefix for ON Semiconductor
> Corp.") was made long ago, the latter commit 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x:
> add onsemi,pca9654 id") made use of another, undocumented vendor prefix.

Ouch...

> Since such prefix doesn't seem to be used in any device trees, I think we
> can just fix the "compatible" string in the driver and the bindings and be
> done with that...
>
> Fixes: 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x: add onsemi,pca9654 id")
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
>
> ---
> The patch is against the 'fixes' branch of LinusW's 'linux-gpio.git' repo.
>
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca953x.txt |2 +-
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c |2 +-

There's another (different) one in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/idt_89hpesx.txt

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: fix vendor prefix for PCA9654

2017-11-16 Thread Sergei Shtylyov

On 11/16/2017 11:18 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:


Despite commit 55020c8056a8 ("of: Add vendor prefix for ON Semiconductor
Corp.") was made long ago, the latter commit 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x:


   Later, of course. Could be fixed while committing, I guess?


add onsemi,pca9654 id") made use of another, undocumented vendor prefix.
Since such prefix doesn't seem to be used in any device trees, I think we
can just fix the "compatible" string in the driver and the bindings and be
done with that...

Fixes: 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x: add onsemi,pca9654 id")
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 

[...]

MBR, Sergei



[PATCH] gpio: pca953x: fix vendor prefix for PCA9654

2017-11-16 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Despite commit 55020c8056a8 ("of: Add vendor prefix for ON Semiconductor
Corp.") was made long ago, the latter commit 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x:
add onsemi,pca9654 id") made use of another, undocumented vendor prefix.
Since such prefix doesn't seem to be used in any device trees, I think we
can just fix the "compatible" string in the driver and the bindings and be
done with that...

Fixes: 9f49f6dd0473 ("gpio: pca953x: add onsemi,pca9654 id")
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov 

---
The patch is against the 'fixes' branch of LinusW's 'linux-gpio.git' repo.

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca953x.txt |2 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c |2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-gpio/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca953x.txt
===
--- linux-gpio.orig/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca953x.txt
+++ linux-gpio/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca953x.txt
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Required properties:
ti,tca6424
ti,tca9539
ti,tca9554
-   onsemi,pca9654
+   onnn,pca9654
exar,xra1202
 
 Optional properties:
Index: linux-gpio/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
===
--- linux-gpio.orig/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
+++ linux-gpio/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id pca953x
{ .compatible = "ti,tca6416", .data = OF_953X(16, PCA_INT), },
{ .compatible = "ti,tca6424", .data = OF_953X(24, PCA_INT), },
 
-   { .compatible = "onsemi,pca9654", .data = OF_953X( 8, PCA_INT), },
+   { .compatible = "onnn,pca9654", .data = OF_953X( 8, PCA_INT), },
 
{ .compatible = "exar,xra1202", .data = OF_953X( 8, 0), },
{ }