Hi Niklas,
Thank you for the patch.
On Monday, 29 January 2018 18:34:21 EET Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Remove over complicated logic to calculate the value for bytesperline
s/over complicated/overcomplicated/
> and sizeimage that was carried over from the soc_camera port. Update the
> calculations to match how other drivers are doing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c | 11 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c index
> 1169e6a279ecfb55..bca6e204a574772f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-v4l2.c
> @@ -118,10 +118,8 @@ static int rvin_format_align(struct rvin_dev *vin,
> struct v4l2_pix_format *pix) v4l_bound_align_image(&pix->width, 2,
> vin->info->max_width, walign, &pix->height, 4, vin->info->max_height, 2,
> 0);
>
> - pix->bytesperline = max_t(u32, pix->bytesperline,
> - rvin_format_bytesperline(pix));
> - pix->sizeimage = max_t(u32, pix->sizeimage,
> -rvin_format_sizeimage(pix));
> + pix->bytesperline = rvin_format_bytesperline(pix);
> + pix->sizeimage = rvin_format_sizeimage(pix);
Thus this mean that the driver will stop supporting configurable strides ?
Isn't that a regression ?
> if (vin->info->model == RCAR_M1 &&
> pix->pixelformat == V4L2_PIX_FMT_XBGR32) {
> @@ -270,11 +268,6 @@ static int __rvin_try_format(struct rvin_dev *vin,
> if (pix->field == V4L2_FIELD_ANY)
> pix->field = vin->format.field;
>
> -
> - /* Always recalculate */
> - pix->bytesperline = 0;
> - pix->sizeimage = 0;
> -
> /* Limit to source capabilities */
> ret = __rvin_try_format_source(vin, which, pix);
> if (ret)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
