Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77970: remove SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH flag

2018-07-09 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:19 PM Niklas Söderlund
 wrote:

> The datasheet does not document any registers to control drive strength,
> and no drive strength registers are for this reason described for this
> SoC. The flags indicating that drive strength can be controlled are
> however set for some pins in the driver.
>
> This leads to a NULL pointer dereference when the sh-pfc core tries to
> access the struct describing the drive strength registers, for example
> when reading the sysfs file pinconf-pins.
>
> Fix this by removing the SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH from all pins.
>
> Fixes: b92ac66a1819602b ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add R8A77970 PFC support")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman 
> Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 

Patch applied directly for fixes per Geert's suggestion.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77970: remove SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH flag

2018-07-03 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Niklas, Linus,

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:20 PM Niklas Söderlund
 wrote:
> The datasheet does not document any registers to control drive strength,
> and no drive strength registers are for this reason described for this
> SoC. The flags indicating that drive strength can be controlled are
> however set for some pins in the driver.
>
> This leads to a NULL pointer dereference when the sh-pfc core tries to
> access the struct describing the drive strength registers, for example
> when reading the sysfs file pinconf-pins.
>
> Fix this by removing the SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH from all pins.
>
> Fixes: b92ac66a1819602b ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add R8A77970 PFC support")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman 
> Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
>
> ---
>
> * Changes since v1
> - Fix spelling in commit message.
> - Add fixes tag.
> - Collect review tags.

Linus: As this fixes a bug (crash), can you please take this directly,
and queue it
for v4.18?

Thanks!

> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c | 14 ++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c 
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c
> index b02caf31671186d9..eeb58b3bbc9a0cef 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c
> @@ -21,15 +21,13 @@
>  #include "core.h"
>  #include "sh_pfc.h"
>
> -#define CFG_FLAGS SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH
> -
>  #define CPU_ALL_PORT(fn, sfx)  \
> -   PORT_GP_CFG_22(0, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS | SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE), \
> -   PORT_GP_CFG_28(1, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS),  \
> -   PORT_GP_CFG_17(2, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS | SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE), \
> -   PORT_GP_CFG_17(3, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS | SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE), \
> -   PORT_GP_CFG_6(4,  fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS),  \
> -   PORT_GP_CFG_15(5, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS)
> +   PORT_GP_CFG_22(0, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE),  \
> +   PORT_GP_28(1, fn, sfx), \
> +   PORT_GP_CFG_17(2, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE),  \
> +   PORT_GP_CFG_17(3, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE),  \
> +   PORT_GP_6(4,  fn, sfx), \
> +   PORT_GP_15(5, fn, sfx)
>  /*
>   * F_() : just information
>   * FM() : macro for FN_xxx / xxx_MARK

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


[PATCH v2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77970: remove SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH flag

2018-07-03 Thread Niklas Söderlund
The datasheet does not document any registers to control drive strength,
and no drive strength registers are for this reason described for this
SoC. The flags indicating that drive strength can be controlled are
however set for some pins in the driver.

This leads to a NULL pointer dereference when the sh-pfc core tries to
access the struct describing the drive strength registers, for example
when reading the sysfs file pinconf-pins.

Fix this by removing the SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH from all pins.

Fixes: b92ac66a1819602b ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Add R8A77970 PFC support")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund 
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman 
Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov 
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 

---

* Changes since v1
- Fix spelling in commit message.
- Add fixes tag.
- Collect review tags.
---
 drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c | 14 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c
index b02caf31671186d9..eeb58b3bbc9a0cef 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77970.c
@@ -21,15 +21,13 @@
 #include "core.h"
 #include "sh_pfc.h"
 
-#define CFG_FLAGS SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_DRIVE_STRENGTH
-
 #define CPU_ALL_PORT(fn, sfx)  \
-   PORT_GP_CFG_22(0, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS | SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE), \
-   PORT_GP_CFG_28(1, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS),  \
-   PORT_GP_CFG_17(2, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS | SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE), \
-   PORT_GP_CFG_17(3, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS | SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE), \
-   PORT_GP_CFG_6(4,  fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS),  \
-   PORT_GP_CFG_15(5, fn, sfx, CFG_FLAGS)
+   PORT_GP_CFG_22(0, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE),  \
+   PORT_GP_28(1, fn, sfx), \
+   PORT_GP_CFG_17(2, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE),  \
+   PORT_GP_CFG_17(3, fn, sfx, SH_PFC_PIN_CFG_IO_VOLTAGE),  \
+   PORT_GP_6(4,  fn, sfx), \
+   PORT_GP_15(5, fn, sfx)
 /*
  * F_() : just information
  * FM() : macro for FN_xxx / xxx_MARK
-- 
2.17.0