Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] PM / core: Print warn if device gets enabled as wakeup source during sleep

2018-01-02 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 30 December 2017 at 01:58, Rafael J. Wysocki  wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Ulf Hansson  wrote:
>> In general, wakeup settings are not supposed to be changed during any of
>> the system wide PM phases. The reason is simply that it would break
>> guarantees provided by the PM core, to properly act on active wakeup
>> sources.
>>
>> However, there are exceptions to when, in particular, disabling a device as
>> wakeup source makes sense. For example, in cases when a driver realizes
>> that its device is dead during system suspend. For these scenarios, we
>> don't need to care about acting on the wakeup source correctly, because a
>> dead device shouldn't deliver wakeup signals.
>>
>> To this reasoning and to help users to properly manage wakeup settings,
>> let's print a warning in cases someone calls device_wakeup_enable() during
>> system sleep.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson 
>> ---
>>  drivers/base/power/main.c   | 4 
>>  drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 4 
>>  include/linux/pm.h  | 1 +
>>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> index 1327726..6b0d312 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
>> @@ -1030,6 +1030,8 @@ static void device_complete(struct device *dev, 
>> pm_message_t state)
>> callback(dev);
>> }
>>
>> +   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup;
>> +
>> device_unlock(dev);
>>
>> pm_runtime_put(dev);
>> @@ -1747,6 +1749,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, 
>> pm_message_t state)
>>
>> device_lock(dev);
>>
>> +   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = false;
>> dev->power.wakeup_path = false;
>>
>> if (dev->power.no_pm_callbacks) {
>> @@ -1775,6 +1778,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, 
>> pm_message_t state)
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> suspend_report_result(callback, ret);
>> pm_runtime_put(dev);
>> +   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup;
>> return ret;
>> }
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
>> index cb72965..5445bea 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
>> @@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ int device_wakeup_enable(struct device *dev)
>> if (!dev || !dev->power.can_wakeup)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> +   if (!dev->power.may_set_wakeup)
>> +   dev_warn(dev, "don't enable as wakup source during 
>> sleep!\n");
>> +
>> ws = wakeup_source_register(dev_name(dev));
>> if (!ws)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -413,6 +416,7 @@ void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct device *dev, bool 
>> capable)
>> return;
>>
>> dev->power.can_wakeup = capable;
>> +   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = capable;
>> if (device_is_registered(dev) && !list_empty(>power.entry)) {
>> if (capable) {
>> int ret = wakeup_sysfs_add(dev);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
>> index ebc6ef8..106fb15 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
>> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
>> struct list_headentry;
>> struct completion   completion;
>> struct wakeup_source*wakeup;
>> +   boolmay_set_wakeup:1;
>> boolwakeup_path:1;
>> boolsyscore:1;
>> boolno_pm_callbacks:1;  /* Owned by the PM 
>> core */
>> --
>
> I didn't mean anything so complicated. :-)

Okay. :-)

>
> Just a warning message if (pm_suspend_target_state != PM_SUSPEND_ON)
> in device_wakeup_enable() (or equivalent) should be sufficient.

Alright, let me re-spin this and thanks for the suggestion.

Kind regards
Uffe


Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] PM / core: Print warn if device gets enabled as wakeup source during sleep

2017-12-29 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Ulf Hansson  wrote:
> In general, wakeup settings are not supposed to be changed during any of
> the system wide PM phases. The reason is simply that it would break
> guarantees provided by the PM core, to properly act on active wakeup
> sources.
>
> However, there are exceptions to when, in particular, disabling a device as
> wakeup source makes sense. For example, in cases when a driver realizes
> that its device is dead during system suspend. For these scenarios, we
> don't need to care about acting on the wakeup source correctly, because a
> dead device shouldn't deliver wakeup signals.
>
> To this reasoning and to help users to properly manage wakeup settings,
> let's print a warning in cases someone calls device_wakeup_enable() during
> system sleep.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson 
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/main.c   | 4 
>  drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 4 
>  include/linux/pm.h  | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> index 1327726..6b0d312 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
> @@ -1030,6 +1030,8 @@ static void device_complete(struct device *dev, 
> pm_message_t state)
> callback(dev);
> }
>
> +   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup;
> +
> device_unlock(dev);
>
> pm_runtime_put(dev);
> @@ -1747,6 +1749,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, 
> pm_message_t state)
>
> device_lock(dev);
>
> +   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = false;
> dev->power.wakeup_path = false;
>
> if (dev->power.no_pm_callbacks) {
> @@ -1775,6 +1778,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, 
> pm_message_t state)
> if (ret < 0) {
> suspend_report_result(callback, ret);
> pm_runtime_put(dev);
> +   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup;
> return ret;
> }
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> index cb72965..5445bea 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ int device_wakeup_enable(struct device *dev)
> if (!dev || !dev->power.can_wakeup)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> +   if (!dev->power.may_set_wakeup)
> +   dev_warn(dev, "don't enable as wakup source during sleep!\n");
> +
> ws = wakeup_source_register(dev_name(dev));
> if (!ws)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -413,6 +416,7 @@ void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct device *dev, bool 
> capable)
> return;
>
> dev->power.can_wakeup = capable;
> +   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = capable;
> if (device_is_registered(dev) && !list_empty(>power.entry)) {
> if (capable) {
> int ret = wakeup_sysfs_add(dev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> index ebc6ef8..106fb15 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
> struct list_headentry;
> struct completion   completion;
> struct wakeup_source*wakeup;
> +   boolmay_set_wakeup:1;
> boolwakeup_path:1;
> boolsyscore:1;
> boolno_pm_callbacks:1;  /* Owned by the PM 
> core */
> --

I didn't mean anything so complicated. :-)

Just a warning message if (pm_suspend_target_state != PM_SUSPEND_ON)
in device_wakeup_enable() (or equivalent) should be sufficient.


[PATCH v2 4/4] PM / core: Print warn if device gets enabled as wakeup source during sleep

2017-12-29 Thread Ulf Hansson
In general, wakeup settings are not supposed to be changed during any of
the system wide PM phases. The reason is simply that it would break
guarantees provided by the PM core, to properly act on active wakeup
sources.

However, there are exceptions to when, in particular, disabling a device as
wakeup source makes sense. For example, in cases when a driver realizes
that its device is dead during system suspend. For these scenarios, we
don't need to care about acting on the wakeup source correctly, because a
dead device shouldn't deliver wakeup signals.

To this reasoning and to help users to properly manage wakeup settings,
let's print a warning in cases someone calls device_wakeup_enable() during
system sleep.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson 
---
 drivers/base/power/main.c   | 4 
 drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 4 
 include/linux/pm.h  | 1 +
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
index 1327726..6b0d312 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -1030,6 +1030,8 @@ static void device_complete(struct device *dev, 
pm_message_t state)
callback(dev);
}
 
+   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup;
+
device_unlock(dev);
 
pm_runtime_put(dev);
@@ -1747,6 +1749,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, 
pm_message_t state)
 
device_lock(dev);
 
+   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = false;
dev->power.wakeup_path = false;
 
if (dev->power.no_pm_callbacks) {
@@ -1775,6 +1778,7 @@ static int device_prepare(struct device *dev, 
pm_message_t state)
if (ret < 0) {
suspend_report_result(callback, ret);
pm_runtime_put(dev);
+   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = dev->power.can_wakeup;
return ret;
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
index cb72965..5445bea 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c
@@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ int device_wakeup_enable(struct device *dev)
if (!dev || !dev->power.can_wakeup)
return -EINVAL;
 
+   if (!dev->power.may_set_wakeup)
+   dev_warn(dev, "don't enable as wakup source during sleep!\n");
+
ws = wakeup_source_register(dev_name(dev));
if (!ws)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -413,6 +416,7 @@ void device_set_wakeup_capable(struct device *dev, bool 
capable)
return;
 
dev->power.can_wakeup = capable;
+   dev->power.may_set_wakeup = capable;
if (device_is_registered(dev) && !list_empty(>power.entry)) {
if (capable) {
int ret = wakeup_sysfs_add(dev);
diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
index ebc6ef8..106fb15 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm.h
@@ -606,6 +606,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
struct list_headentry;
struct completion   completion;
struct wakeup_source*wakeup;
+   boolmay_set_wakeup:1;
boolwakeup_path:1;
boolsyscore:1;
boolno_pm_callbacks:1;  /* Owned by the PM core 
*/
-- 
2.7.4