Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Simon Horman
wrote:
> Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd,
>
> Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6.
>
>
> Allow serial to work once again on the Porter board (Revision B) which
> does not have the oscillator in question mounted.
Have you tested this on Porter?
I believe there's another change to be made for this revert to actually work,
cfr. "[PATCH] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks"
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/6/350)
> The following changes since commit f55532a0c0b8bb6148f4e07853b876ef73bc69ca:
>
> Linux 4.6-rc1 (2016-03-26 16:03:24 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git
> tags/renesas-fixes-for-v4.6
>
> for you to fetch changes up to e885767418bff0c591cc1e45babdd25d91b4a795:
>
> Revert "ARM: dts: porter: Enable SCIF_CLK frequency and pins" (2016-04-08
> 15:56:28 +0900)
>
>
> Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
>
> * Revert "ARM: dts: porter: Enable SCIF_CLK frequency and pins"
>
>
> Sjoerd Simons (1):
> Revert "ARM: dts: porter: Enable SCIF_CLK frequency and pins"
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Simon Horman > wrote: > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6. > > > > > > Allow serial to work once again on the Porter board (Revision B) which > > does not have the oscillator in question mounted. > > Have you tested this on Porter? I don't have working access to a porter at this time. > I believe there's another change to be made for this revert to actually work, > cfr. "[PATCH] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks" > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/6/350) Ok, understood. Could someone verify that?
Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
Hi Geert, Hi Sjoerd, On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:02:54AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Simon Horman > > wrote: > > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6. > > > > > > > > > Allow serial to work once again on the Porter board (Revision B) which > > > does not have the oscillator in question mounted. > > > > Have you tested this on Porter? > > I don't have working access to a porter at this time. > > > I believe there's another change to be made for this revert to actually > > work, > > cfr. "[PATCH] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks" > > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/6/350) > > Ok, understood. > > Could someone verify that? I have added "ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks" to the fixes-for-v4.6 branch and plan to push it in a fresh renesas-next tag a little later today. I would appreciate any review and/or testing on porter of that branch. Thanks!
Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:02:54AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Simon Horman
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd,
>> > >
>> > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Allow serial to work once again on the Porter board (Revision B) which
>> > > does not have the oscillator in question mounted.
>> >
>> > Have you tested this on Porter?
>>
>> I don't have working access to a porter at this time.
>>
>> > I believe there's another change to be made for this revert to actually
>> > work,
>> > cfr. "[PATCH] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks"
>> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/6/350)
>>
>> Ok, understood.
>>
>> Could someone verify that?
>
> I have added "ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks"
> to the fixes-for-v4.6 branch and plan to push it in a fresh renesas-next
> tag a little later today.
Thanks!
I would queue
ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks
before
Revert "ARM: dts: porter: Enable SCIF_CLK frequency and pins"
to preserve bisectability. So please reorder these two commits.
> I would appreciate any review and/or testing on porter of that branch.
I've provided my Reviewed-By in the original thread.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
Hey Simon, On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 14:12 +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > Hi Geert, Hi Sjoerd, > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:02:54AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Simon Horman > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > > > > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6. > > > > > > > > > > > > Allow serial to work once again on the Porter board (Revision > > > > B) which > > > > does not have the oscillator in question mounted. > > > Have you tested this on Porter? > > I don't have working access to a porter at this time. > > > > > > > > I believe there's another change to be made for this revert to > > > actually work, > > > cfr. "[PATCH] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced > > > optional clocks" > > > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/6/350) > > Ok, understood. > > > > Could someone verify that? > I have added "ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional > clocks" > to the fixes-for-v4.6 branch and plan to push it in a fresh renesas- > next > tag a little later today. > > I would appreciate any review and/or testing on porter of that branch. I've tested this branch (top commit 3d7277614d29) on a Porter revision B board and can confirm the serial console works as expected. Feel free to add: Tested-by: Sjoerd Simons -- Sjoerd Simons Collabora Ltd.
Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:23:10AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:02:54AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Simon Horman > >> > wrote: > >> > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > >> > > > >> > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Allow serial to work once again on the Porter board (Revision B) which > >> > > does not have the oscillator in question mounted. > >> > > >> > Have you tested this on Porter? > >> > >> I don't have working access to a porter at this time. > >> > >> > I believe there's another change to be made for this revert to actually > >> > work, > >> > cfr. "[PATCH] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional > >> > clocks" > >> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/6/350) > >> > >> Ok, understood. > >> > >> Could someone verify that? > > > > I have added "ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks" > > to the fixes-for-v4.6 branch and plan to push it in a fresh renesas-next > > tag a little later today. > > Thanks! > > I would queue > > ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks > > before > > Revert "ARM: dts: porter: Enable SCIF_CLK frequency and pins" > > to preserve bisectability. So please reorder these two commits. Thanks, I have reordered the commits as you suggest. > > I would appreciate any review and/or testing on porter of that branch. > > I've provided my Reviewed-By in the original thread. Thanks, got it.
Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:12:03AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > Hey Simon, > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 14:12 +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi Geert, Hi Sjoerd, > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:02:54AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Simon Horman > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > > > > > > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Allow serial to work once again on the Porter board (Revision > > > > > B) which > > > > > does not have the oscillator in question mounted. > > > > Have you tested this on Porter? > > > I don't have working access to a porter at this time. > > > > > > > > > > > I believe there's another change to be made for this revert to > > > > actually work, > > > > cfr. "[PATCH] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced > > > > optional clocks" > > > > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/6/350) > > > Ok, understood. > > > > > > Could someone verify that? > > I have added "ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional > > clocks" > > to the fixes-for-v4.6 branch and plan to push it in a fresh renesas- > > next > > tag a little later today. > > > > I would appreciate any review and/or testing on porter of that > branch. > > I've tested this branch (top commit 3d7277614d29) on a Porter revision > B board and can confirm the serial console works as expected. > > Feel free to add: > Tested-by: Sjoerd Simons Thanks, that is really helpful! I think I will leave out the extra tag as the patches in question are already signed off by you.
Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
Simon Horman writes: > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6. > > > The following changes since commit f55532a0c0b8bb6148f4e07853b876ef73bc69ca: > > Linux 4.6-rc1 (2016-03-26 16:03:24 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git > tags/renesas-fixes-for-v4.6 > > for you to fetch changes up to c531fb27e9699eaee478ee5686a3cca5dee73602: > > ARM: shmobile: timer: Fix preset_lpj leading to too short delays > (2016-04-20 08:52:55 +1000) > > > Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6 > > * Correct preset_lpj calculation which may lead to too short delays > * Correct handling of optional clocks on r8a7791 to restore > access to the serial port the porter board > > Applied to fixes, Kevin
Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6
Hi Simon, Kevin Hilman writes: > Simon Horman writes: > >> Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, >> >> Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6. >> >> >> The following changes since commit f55532a0c0b8bb6148f4e07853b876ef73bc69ca: >> >> Linux 4.6-rc1 (2016-03-26 16:03:24 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git >> tags/renesas-fixes-for-v4.6 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to c531fb27e9699eaee478ee5686a3cca5dee73602: >> >> ARM: shmobile: timer: Fix preset_lpj leading to too short delays >> (2016-04-20 08:52:55 +1000) >> >> >> Renesas ARM Based SoC Fixes for v4.6 >> >> * Correct preset_lpj calculation which may lead to too short delays >> * Correct handling of optional clocks on r8a7791 to restore >> access to the serial port the porter board >> >> > > Applied to fixes, > Note that when merging arm-soc/fixes back into our for-next branch, your fixes conflict with some other stuff you have queued up for v4.7. Please double-check my conflict resolutions in for-next. Thanks, Kevin
