RE: [PATCH 1/3] Move FIMD register headers to include/video/

2012-07-31 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hello,

On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 2:48 AM Jingoo Han wrote:

 On Monday, July 30, 2012 8:16 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
 
  Hello Jingoo Han,
 
  On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
   On Monday, July 30, 2012 5:45 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
  
   Moved the contents of regs-fb-v4.h and regs-fb.h from arch side
   to include/video/samsung_fimd.h
  
   Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
   ---
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h |  159 ---
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h|  403 -
include/video/samsung_fimd.h|  533 
   +++
3 files changed, 533 insertions(+), 562 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h
create mode 100644 include/video/samsung_fimd.h
  
   +*/
   +
   +/*FIMD V8 REG OFFSET */
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDTCON0 (0x20010)
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDTCON1 (0x20014)
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDTCON2 (0x20018)
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDTCON3 (0x2001C)
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDCON1  (0x20004)
 
 
 How about using soc_is_exynos5250()?
 
 +#define VIDTCON0 (soc_is_exynos5250() ? \
 + (0x20010) : (0x10))
 
 In this case, the FIMD driver does not need to change.
 Also, one binary is available.

Please don't mix two methods of runtime detection. FIMD driver (s3c-fb) already
has runtime hw detection based on platform device id. Adding such detection for 
exynos5 to DRM FIMD driver should not be a big issue too.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung Poland RD Center


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 1/3] Move FIMD register headers to include/video/

2012-07-31 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi,

On Tuesday 31 of July 2012 at 09:47:57, Jingoo Han wrote:
 On Monday, July 30, 2012 8:16 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
  Hello Jingoo Han,
  
  On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com wrote:
   On Monday, July 30, 2012 5:45 PM, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
   Moved the contents of regs-fb-v4.h and regs-fb.h from arch side
   to include/video/samsung_fimd.h
   
   Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
   ---
   
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h |  159 ---
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h|  403
-
include/video/samsung_fimd.h|  533
+++ 3 files changed, 533 insertions(+), 562
deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h
create mode 100644 include/video/samsung_fimd.h
   
   +*/
   +
   +/*FIMD V8 REG OFFSET */
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDTCON0 (0x20010)
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDTCON1 (0x20014)
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDTCON2 (0x20018)
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDTCON3 (0x2001C)
   +#define FIMD_V8_VIDCON1  (0x20004)
 
 How about using soc_is_exynos5250()?
 
 +#define VIDTCON0 (soc_is_exynos5250() ? \
 + (0x20010) : (0x10))
 
 In this case, the FIMD driver does not need to change.
 Also, one binary is available.
 

This would look good indeed, but there are some drawbacks:
- it would not scale nicely for future SoCs using the new FIMD
- it would add the overhead of checking SoC ID for every access to affected 
registers (at least 1 load, 1 AND, 1 compare, 1 move and 1 conditional OR, so 
5 instructions in total, possibly even more, as opposed to a single load from 
a variant struct).

I would stay with the way used in s3c-fb driver, using variant structs 
describing FIMD revisions.

Best regards,
Tomasz Figa

 
 Best regards,
 Jingoo Han
 
   CC'ed Marek.
   
   To Leela Krishna Amudala,
   
   Don't add these definitions for FIMD_V8_xxx registers, which arenot
   related to current regs-fb-v4.h 
  and regs-fb.h.
  
   Just move and merge regs-fb-v4.h and regs-fb.h to one header file,
   not add new definitions. If you want to add these definitions, please
   make new patch for this. 
  Will do it in the suggested way,
  
   Also, #define FIMD_V8_xxx is ugly.
   I think that there is better way.
   Please, find other way.
  
  I used FIMD_V8_xxx instead of  EXYNOS5_FIMD_*, because in future,
  there is a possibility that version 8 FIMD can be used in other
  application processors also.
  Thanks for reviewing the patch.
  
  Best Wishes,
  Leela Krishna.
  
   --
   1.7.0.4
   
   --
   To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fbdev
   in
   the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
   More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc
 in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC/PATCH 09/13] media: s5k6aa: Add support for device tree based instantiation

2012-07-31 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Guennadi,

On Tuesday 31 July 2012 13:14:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
 On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
  On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:56:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
   On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 11:18:33 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
 On 07/16/2012 11:42 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
  On Fri, 25 May 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
  The driver initializes all board related properties except the
  s_power() callback to board code. The platforms that require this
  callback are not supported by this driver yet for CONFIG_OF=y.
  
  Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrockis.nawro...@samsung.com
  Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej
  Zolnierkiewiczb.zolnier...@samsung.com
  Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Parkkyungmin.p...@samsung.com
  ---
  
.../bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt   |   57
+
drivers/media/video/s5k6aa.c   |  129
++-- 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 40
deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt
  
  diff --git
  a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt
  b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt
  new
  file
  mode 100644
  index 000..6685a9c
  --- /dev/null
  +++
  b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt
  @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
  +Samsung S5K6AAFX camera sensor
  +--
  +
  +Required properties:
  +
  +- compatible : samsung,s5k6aafx;
  +- reg : base address of the device on I2C bus;
  
  You said you ended up putting your sensors outside of I2C busses,
  is this one of changes, that are present in your git-tree but not
  in this series?
 
 No, I must have been not clear enough on that. Our idea was to keep
 I2C slave device nodes as an I2C controller's child nodes, according
 to the current convention.
 The 'sensor' nodes (the 'camera''s children) would only contain a
 phandle to a respective I2C slave node.
 
 This implies that we cannot access I2C bus in I2C client's device
 probe() callback. An actual H/W access could begin only from within
 and after invocation of v4l2_subdev .registered callback..

That's how I've envisioned the DT bindings for sensors as well, this
sounds good. The real challenge will be to get hold of the subdev to
register it without race conditions.
   
   Hrm... That's how early pre-subdev versions of soc-camera used to work,
   that's where all the device_video_probe() functions come from. But
   then we switched to dynamic i2c device registration. Do we want to
   switch all drivers back now?... Couldn't we temporarily use references
   from subdevs to hosts until the clock API is available?
  
  I don't think that requires a reference from subdevs to hosts in the DT.
  The subdev will need the host to be probed before a clock can be
  available so you won't be able to access the hardware in the probe()
  function in the generic case. You will need to wait until the
  registered() subdev operation is called, at which point the host can be
  accessed through the v4l2_device.
 
 Sure, I understand, but that's exactly what we wanted to avoid -
 succeeding client's i2c .probe() without even touching the hardware.

But should we allow host probe() to succeed if the sensor isn't present ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC/PATCH 09/13] media: s5k6aa: Add support for device tree based instantiation

2012-07-31 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

 Hi Guennadi,
 
 On Tuesday 31 July 2012 13:14:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
  On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
   On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:56:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
 On Wednesday 18 July 2012 11:18:33 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
  On 07/16/2012 11:42 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
   On Fri, 25 May 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
   The driver initializes all board related properties except the
   s_power() callback to board code. The platforms that require this
   callback are not supported by this driver yet for CONFIG_OF=y.
   
   Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrockis.nawro...@samsung.com
   Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej
   Zolnierkiewiczb.zolnier...@samsung.com
   Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Parkkyungmin.p...@samsung.com
   ---
   
 .../bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt   |   57
 +
 drivers/media/video/s5k6aa.c   |  129
 ++-- 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 40
 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt
   
   diff --git
   a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt
   b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt
   new
   file
   mode 100644
   index 000..6685a9c
   --- /dev/null
   +++
   b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt
   @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
   +Samsung S5K6AAFX camera sensor
   +--
   +
   +Required properties:
   +
   +- compatible : samsung,s5k6aafx;
   +- reg : base address of the device on I2C bus;
   
   You said you ended up putting your sensors outside of I2C busses,
   is this one of changes, that are present in your git-tree but not
   in this series?
  
  No, I must have been not clear enough on that. Our idea was to keep
  I2C slave device nodes as an I2C controller's child nodes, according
  to the current convention.
  The 'sensor' nodes (the 'camera''s children) would only contain a
  phandle to a respective I2C slave node.
  
  This implies that we cannot access I2C bus in I2C client's device
  probe() callback. An actual H/W access could begin only from within
  and after invocation of v4l2_subdev .registered callback..
 
 That's how I've envisioned the DT bindings for sensors as well, this
 sounds good. The real challenge will be to get hold of the subdev to
 register it without race conditions.

Hrm... That's how early pre-subdev versions of soc-camera used to work,
that's where all the device_video_probe() functions come from. But
then we switched to dynamic i2c device registration. Do we want to
switch all drivers back now?... Couldn't we temporarily use references
from subdevs to hosts until the clock API is available?
   
   I don't think that requires a reference from subdevs to hosts in the DT.
   The subdev will need the host to be probed before a clock can be
   available so you won't be able to access the hardware in the probe()
   function in the generic case. You will need to wait until the
   registered() subdev operation is called, at which point the host can be
   accessed through the v4l2_device.
  
  Sure, I understand, but that's exactly what we wanted to avoid -
  succeeding client's i2c .probe() without even touching the hardware.
 
 But should we allow host probe() to succeed if the sensor isn't present ?

I think we should, yes. The host hardware is there and functional - 
whether or not all or some of the clients are failing. Theoretically 
clients can also be hot-plugged. Whether and how many video device nodes 
we create, that's a different question.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC/PATCH 09/13] media: s5k6aa: Add support for device tree based instantiation

2012-07-31 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Guennadi,

On Tuesday 31 July 2012 13:29:55 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
 On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
  On Tuesday 31 July 2012 13:14:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
   On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:56:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
 On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
  On Wednesday 18 July 2012 11:18:33 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
   On 07/16/2012 11:42 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
The driver initializes all board related properties except
the s_power() callback to board code. The platforms that
require this callback are not supported by this driver yet
for CONFIG_OF=y.

Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrockis.nawro...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej
Zolnierkiewiczb.zolnier...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Parkkyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---

  .../bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt   |   57
  +
  drivers/media/video/s5k6aa.c   |  129
  ++-- 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 40
  deletions(-)
  create mode 100644
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.t
  xt

diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.t
xt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.t
xt
new
file
mode 100644
index 000..6685a9c
--- /dev/null
+++
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.t
xt
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+Samsung S5K6AAFX camera sensor
+--
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible : samsung,s5k6aafx;
+- reg : base address of the device on I2C bus;

You said you ended up putting your sensors outside of I2C
busses, is this one of changes, that are present in your git-
tree but not in this series?
   
   No, I must have been not clear enough on that. Our idea was to
   keep I2C slave device nodes as an I2C controller's child nodes,
   according to the current convention. The 'sensor' nodes (the
   'camera''s children) would only contain a phandle to a
   respective I2C slave node.
   
   This implies that we cannot access I2C bus in I2C client's
   device probe() callback. An actual H/W access could begin only
   from within and after invocation of v4l2_subdev .registered
   callback..
  
  That's how I've envisioned the DT bindings for sensors as well,
  this sounds good. The real challenge will be to get hold of the
  subdev to register it without race conditions.
 
 Hrm... That's how early pre-subdev versions of soc-camera used to
 work, that's where all the device_video_probe() functions come
 from. But then we switched to dynamic i2c device registration. Do we
 want to switch all drivers back now?... Couldn't we temporarily
 use references from subdevs to hosts until the clock API is
 available?

I don't think that requires a reference from subdevs to hosts in the
DT. The subdev will need the host to be probed before a clock can be
available so you won't be able to access the hardware in the probe()
function in the generic case. You will need to wait until the
registered() subdev operation is called, at which point the host can
be accessed through the v4l2_device.
   
   Sure, I understand, but that's exactly what we wanted to avoid -
   succeeding client's i2c .probe() without even touching the hardware.
  
  But should we allow host probe() to succeed if the sensor isn't present ?
 
 I think we should, yes. The host hardware is there and functional -
 whether or not all or some of the clients are failing. Theoretically
 clients can also be hot-plugged. Whether and how many video device nodes
 we create, that's a different question.

I think I can agree with you on this (although I could change my mind if this 
architecture turns out to result in unsolvable technical issues). That will 
involve a lot of work though.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH V2 0/5] arm: samsung: Move FIMD headers to include/video/

2012-07-31 Thread Leela Krishna Amudala
This patchset moves the contents of regs-fb-v4.h and regs-fb.h from arch side
to include/video/samsung_fimd.h

This patchset is created and rebased against master branch of torvalds tree.
Tested on smdk5250 board, build tested for other boards.

Changes from version 1:
- Split the patches as per Sylwester comments
- Changed FIMD_V8_xxx macro to EXYNOS5_xxx  

Leela Krishna Amudala (5):
  include/video: Add samsung FIMD register header
  include/video: Add Exynos5 specific FIMD register offsets
  arm: samsung: Include the modified FIMD header file
  driver: Include the modified FIMD header file
  arm: samsung: delete frame buffer header files from platform

 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimd0.c |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-hmt.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-ncp.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-real6410.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq5.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq7.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/mach-smdk6440.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/mach-smdk6450.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/mach-smdkc100.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c|2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h|  159 
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c   |2 +-
 drivers/video/s3c-fb.c |2 +-
 .../plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h |  152 +--
 26 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 194 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
 rename arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h = 
include/video/samsung_fimd.h (74%)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH V2 1/5] include/video: Add samsung FIMD register header

2012-07-31 Thread Leela Krishna Amudala
This patch copies the contents from regs-fb-v4.h and regs-fb.h to
include/video/samsung_fimd.h

Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
---
 include/video/samsung_fimd.h |  526 ++
 1 files changed, 526 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/video/samsung_fimd.h

diff --git a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..e979f42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
@@ -0,0 +1,526 @@
+/* include/video/samsung_fimd.h
+ *
+ * Copyright 2008 Openmoko, Inc.
+ * Copyright 2008 Simtec Electronics
+ *  http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/
+ *  Ben Dooks b...@simtec.co.uk
+ *
+ * S3C Platform - new-style fimd and framebuffer register definitions
+ *
+ * This is the register set for the fimd and new style framebuffer interface
+ * found from the S3C2443 onwards into the S3C2416, S3C2450 and the
+ * S3C64XX series such as the S3C6400 and S3C6410.
+ *
+ * The file does not contain the cpu specific items which are based on
+ * whichever architecture is selected, it only contains the core of the
+ * register set. See mach/regs-fb.h to get the specifics.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+*/
+
+/* VIDCON0 */
+
+#define VIDCON0(0x00)
+#define VIDCON0_INTERLACE  (1  29)
+#define VIDCON0_VIDOUT_MASK(0x3  26)
+#define VIDCON0_VIDOUT_SHIFT   (26)
+#define VIDCON0_VIDOUT_RGB (0x0  26)
+#define VIDCON0_VIDOUT_TV  (0x1  26)
+#define VIDCON0_VIDOUT_I80_LDI0(0x2  26)
+#define VIDCON0_VIDOUT_I80_LDI1(0x3  26)
+
+#define VIDCON0_L1_DATA_MASK   (0x7  23)
+#define VIDCON0_L1_DATA_SHIFT  (23)
+#define VIDCON0_L1_DATA_16BPP  (0x0  23)
+#define VIDCON0_L1_DATA_18BPP16(0x1  23)
+#define VIDCON0_L1_DATA_18BPP9 (0x2  23)
+#define VIDCON0_L1_DATA_24BPP  (0x3  23)
+#define VIDCON0_L1_DATA_18BPP  (0x4  23)
+#define VIDCON0_L1_DATA_16BPP8 (0x5  23)
+
+#define VIDCON0_L0_DATA_MASK   (0x7  20)
+#define VIDCON0_L0_DATA_SHIFT  (20)
+#define VIDCON0_L0_DATA_16BPP  (0x0  20)
+#define VIDCON0_L0_DATA_18BPP16(0x1  20)
+#define VIDCON0_L0_DATA_18BPP9 (0x2  20)
+#define VIDCON0_L0_DATA_24BPP  (0x3  20)
+#define VIDCON0_L0_DATA_18BPP  (0x4  20)
+#define VIDCON0_L0_DATA_16BPP8 (0x5  20)
+
+#define VIDCON0_PNRMODE_MASK   (0x3  17)
+#define VIDCON0_PNRMODE_SHIFT  (17)
+#define VIDCON0_PNRMODE_RGB(0x0  17)
+#define VIDCON0_PNRMODE_BGR(0x1  17)
+#define VIDCON0_PNRMODE_SERIAL_RGB (0x2  17)
+#define VIDCON0_PNRMODE_SERIAL_BGR (0x3  17)
+
+#define VIDCON0_CLKVALUP   (1  16)
+#define VIDCON0_CLKVAL_F_MASK  (0xff  6)
+#define VIDCON0_CLKVAL_F_SHIFT (6)
+#define VIDCON0_CLKVAL_F_LIMIT (0xff)
+#define VIDCON0_CLKVAL_F(_x)   ((_x)  6)
+#define VIDCON0_VLCKFREE   (1  5)
+#define VIDCON0_CLKDIR (1  4)
+
+#define VIDCON0_CLKSEL_MASK(0x3  2)
+#define VIDCON0_CLKSEL_SHIFT   (2)
+#define VIDCON0_CLKSEL_HCLK(0x0  2)
+#define VIDCON0_CLKSEL_LCD (0x1  2)
+#define VIDCON0_CLKSEL_27M (0x3  2)
+
+#define VIDCON0_ENVID  (1  1)
+#define VIDCON0_ENVID_F(1  0)
+
+#define VIDCON1(0x04)
+#define VIDCON1_LINECNT_MASK   (0x7ff  16)
+#define VIDCON1_LINECNT_SHIFT  (16)
+#define VIDCON1_LINECNT_GET(_v)(((_v)  16)  0x7ff)
+#define VIDCON1_VSTATUS_MASK   (0x3  13)
+#define VIDCON1_VSTATUS_SHIFT  (13)
+#define VIDCON1_VSTATUS_VSYNC  (0x0  13)
+#define VIDCON1_VSTATUS_BACKPORCH  (0x1  13)
+#define VIDCON1_VSTATUS_ACTIVE (0x2  13)
+#define VIDCON1_VSTATUS_FRONTPORCH (0x0  13)
+#define VIDCON1_VCLK_MASK  (0x3  9)
+#define VIDCON1_VCLK_HOLD  (0x0  9)
+#define VIDCON1_VCLK_RUN   (0x1  9)
+
+#define VIDCON1_INV_VCLK   (1  7)
+#define VIDCON1_INV_HSYNC  (1  6)
+#define VIDCON1_INV_VSYNC  (1  5)
+#define VIDCON1_INV_VDEN   (1  4)
+
+/* VIDCON2 */
+
+#define VIDCON2   

[PATCH V2 2/5] include/video: Add Exynos5 specific FIMD register offsets

2012-07-31 Thread Leela Krishna Amudala
Exynos5 has VIDTCON and VIDCON registers at different offsets
from the previous SOCs. Hence, adding the macros.

Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
---
 include/video/samsung_fimd.h |7 +++
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
index e979f42..820f190 100644
--- a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
+++ b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
@@ -524,3 +524,10 @@
  * 1110-none-   -none-   -none-   -none--none-
  * -none-   -none-   -none-   -none--none-
 */
+
+/*EXYNOS5 FIMD REG OFFSET */
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON0   (0x20010)
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON1   (0x20014)
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON2   (0x20018)
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON3   (0x2001C)
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDCON1(0x20004)
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH V2 3/5] arm: samsung: Include the modified FIMD header file

2012-07-31 Thread Leela Krishna Amudala
The fimd register headers have been moved to include/video/
hence, modifying the machine files accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimd0.c |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-hmt.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-ncp.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-real6410.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq5.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq7.c   |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/mach-smdk6440.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/mach-smdk6450.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/mach-smdkc100.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c|2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c  |2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c  |2 +-
 22 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
index f98a83a..573a0c4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 #include asm/mach-types.h
 
 #include plat/adc.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 #include plat/regs-serial.h
 #include plat/cpu.h
 #include plat/devs.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c
index 5a12dc2..c69707e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 #include video/platform_lcd.h
 
 #include plat/regs-serial.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 #include plat/cpu.h
 #include plat/devs.h
 #include plat/sdhci.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c
index b26beb1..8a8acff 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
 #include plat/iic.h
 #include plat/keypad.h
 #include plat/mfc.h
-#include plat/regs-fb.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 #include plat/regs-serial.h
 #include plat/sdhci.h
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c
index 3cfa688..c2df6e8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 #include video/platform_lcd.h
 #include plat/regs-serial.h
 #include plat/regs-srom.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 #include plat/cpu.h
 #include plat/devs.h
 #include plat/fb.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c
index 4d1f40d..e6fb471 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 #include plat/fb.h
 #include plat/mfc.h
 #include plat/sdhci.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 #include plat/fimc-core.h
 #include plat/s5p-time.h
 #include plat/camport.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimd0.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimd0.c
index 07a6dbe..53c4c51 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimd0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimd0.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 #include linux/gpio.h
 
 #include plat/gpio-cfg.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 
 #include mach/map.h
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c
index c3100a0..c8d5f51 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
 #include plat/udc.h
 #include linux/platform_data/s3c-hsudc.h
 
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 #include plat/fb.h
 
 #include plat/common-smdk.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c
index ffa29dd..27e3087 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
 #include plat/regs-serial.h
 #include plat/iic.h
 #include plat/fb.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 
 #include plat/clock.h
 #include plat/devs.h
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c
index 09cd812..66e8c69 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
 #include mach/regs-gpio-memport.h
 
 #include plat/regs-serial.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 

[PATCH V2 4/5] driver: Include the modified FIMD header file

2012-07-31 Thread Leela Krishna Amudala
The fimd register headers have been moved to include/video/
hence, modifying the driver files accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c |2 +-
 drivers/video/s3c-fb.c   |2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
index 29fdbfe..8da90f9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 #include linux/pm_runtime.h
 
 #include drm/exynos_drm.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 
 #include exynos_drm_drv.h
 #include exynos_drm_fbdev.h
diff --git a/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c
index 69bf9d0..1226fdd 100644
--- a/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 #include linux/pm_runtime.h
 
 #include mach/map.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 #include plat/fb.h
 
 /* This driver will export a number of framebuffer interfaces depending
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH V2 5/5] arm: samsung: delete frame buffer header files from platform

2012-07-31 Thread Leela Krishna Amudala
The FIMD register headers are moved to include/video/
hence, deleting these files from platform side

Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
---
 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h |  159 -
 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h|  403 ---
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 562 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h 
b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 4c3647f..000
--- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,159 +0,0 @@
-/* arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
- *
- * Copyright 2008 Openmoko, Inc.
- * Copyright 2008 Simtec Electronics
- *  http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/
- *  Ben Dooks b...@simtec.co.uk
- *
- * S3C64XX - new-style framebuffer register definitions
- *
- * This is the register set for the new style framebuffer interface
- * found from the S3C2443 onwards and specifically the S3C64XX series
- * S3C6400 and S3C6410.
- *
- * The file contains the cpu specific items which change between whichever
- * architecture is selected. See plat/regs-fb.h for the core definitions
- * that are the same.
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
-*/
-
-/* include the core definitions here, in case we really do need to
- * override them at a later date.
-*/
-
-#include plat/regs-fb.h
-
-#define S3C_FB_MAX_WIN (5)  /* number of hardware windows available. */
-#define VIDCON1_FSTATUS_EVEN   (1  15)
-
-/* Video timing controls */
-#define VIDTCON0   (0x10)
-#define VIDTCON1   (0x14)
-#define VIDTCON2   (0x18)
-
-/* Window position controls */
-
-#define WINCON(_win)   (0x20 + ((_win) * 4))
-
-/* OSD1 and OSD4 do not have register D */
-
-#define VIDOSD_BASE(0x40)
-
-#define VIDINTCON0 (0x130)
-
-/* WINCONx */
-
-#define WINCONx_CSCWIDTH_MASK  (0x3  26)
-#define WINCONx_CSCWIDTH_SHIFT (26)
-#define WINCONx_CSCWIDTH_WIDE  (0x0  26)
-#define WINCONx_CSCWIDTH_NARROW(0x3  26)
-
-#define WINCONx_ENLOCAL(1  22)
-#define WINCONx_BUFSTATUS  (1  21)
-#define WINCONx_BUFSEL (1  20)
-#define WINCONx_BUFAUTOEN  (1  19)
-#define WINCONx_YCbCr  (1  13)
-
-#define WINCON1_LOCALSEL_CAMIF (1  23)
-
-#define WINCON2_LOCALSEL_CAMIF (1  23)
-#define WINCON2_BLD_PIX(1  6)
-
-#define WINCON2_ALPHA_SEL  (1  1)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_MASK   (0xf  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_SHIFT  (2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_1BPP   (0x0  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_2BPP   (0x1  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_4BPP   (0x2  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_8BPP_1232  (0x4  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_16BPP_565  (0x5  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_16BPP_A1555(0x6  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_16BPP_I1555(0x7  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_18BPP_666  (0x8  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_18BPP_A1665(0x9  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_19BPP_A1666(0xa  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_24BPP_888  (0xb  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_24BPP_A1887(0xc  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_25BPP_A1888(0xd  2)
-#define WINCON2_BPPMODE_28BPP_A4888(0xd  2)
-
-#define WINCON3_BLD_PIX(1  6)
-
-#define WINCON3_ALPHA_SEL  (1  1)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_MASK   (0xf  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_SHIFT  (2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_1BPP   (0x0  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_2BPP   (0x1  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_4BPP   (0x2  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_16BPP_565  (0x5  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_16BPP_A1555(0x6  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_16BPP_I1555(0x7  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_18BPP_666  (0x8  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_18BPP_A1665(0x9  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_19BPP_A1666(0xa  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_24BPP_888  (0xb  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_24BPP_A1887(0xc  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_25BPP_A1888(0xd  2)
-#define WINCON3_BPPMODE_28BPP_A4888(0xd  2)
-
-#define VIDINTCON0_FIFIOSEL_WINDOW2(0x10  5)
-#define 

Re: [RFC/PATCH 09/13] media: s5k6aa: Add support for device tree based instantiation

2012-07-31 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

 Hi Guennadi,
 
 On Tuesday 31 July 2012 13:29:55 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
  On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
   On Tuesday 31 July 2012 13:14:13 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
 On Tuesday 31 July 2012 11:56:44 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
  On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
   On Wednesday 18 July 2012 11:18:33 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 07/16/2012 11:42 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
 On Fri, 25 May 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
 The driver initializes all board related properties except
 the s_power() callback to board code. The platforms that
 require this callback are not supported by this driver yet
 for CONFIG_OF=y.
 
 Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrockis.nawro...@samsung.com
 Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej
 Zolnierkiewiczb.zolnier...@samsung.com
 Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Parkkyungmin.p...@samsung.com
 ---
 
   .../bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.txt   |   57
   +
   drivers/media/video/s5k6aa.c   |  129
   ++-- 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 40
   deletions(-)
   create mode 100644
   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.t
   xt
 
 diff --git
 a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.t
 xt
 b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.t
 xt
 new
 file
 mode 100644
 index 000..6685a9c
 --- /dev/null
 +++
 b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/camera/samsung-s5k6aafx.t
 xt
 @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
 +Samsung S5K6AAFX camera sensor
 +--
 +
 +Required properties:
 +
 +- compatible : samsung,s5k6aafx;
 +- reg : base address of the device on I2C bus;
 
 You said you ended up putting your sensors outside of I2C
 busses, is this one of changes, that are present in your git-
 tree but not in this series?

No, I must have been not clear enough on that. Our idea was to
keep I2C slave device nodes as an I2C controller's child nodes,
according to the current convention. The 'sensor' nodes (the
'camera''s children) would only contain a phandle to a
respective I2C slave node.

This implies that we cannot access I2C bus in I2C client's
device probe() callback. An actual H/W access could begin only
from within and after invocation of v4l2_subdev .registered
callback..
   
   That's how I've envisioned the DT bindings for sensors as well,
   this sounds good. The real challenge will be to get hold of the
   subdev to register it without race conditions.
  
  Hrm... That's how early pre-subdev versions of soc-camera used to
  work, that's where all the device_video_probe() functions come
  from. But then we switched to dynamic i2c device registration. Do we
  want to switch all drivers back now?... Couldn't we temporarily
  use references from subdevs to hosts until the clock API is
  available?
 
 I don't think that requires a reference from subdevs to hosts in the
 DT. The subdev will need the host to be probed before a clock can be
 available so you won't be able to access the hardware in the probe()
 function in the generic case. You will need to wait until the
 registered() subdev operation is called, at which point the host can
 be accessed through the v4l2_device.

Sure, I understand, but that's exactly what we wanted to avoid -
succeeding client's i2c .probe() without even touching the hardware.
   
   But should we allow host probe() to succeed if the sensor isn't present ?
  
  I think we should, yes. The host hardware is there and functional -
  whether or not all or some of the clients are failing. Theoretically
  clients can also be hot-plugged. Whether and how many video device nodes
  we create, that's a different question.
 
 I think I can agree with you on this (although I could change my mind if this 
 architecture turns out to result in unsolvable technical issues). That will 
 involve a lot of work though.

There's however at least one more gotcha that occurs to me with this 
approach: if clients fail to probe, how do we find out about that and turn 
clocks back off? One improvement to turning clocks on immediately in 
host's probe() is to only do it in a BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER notifier. But 
how do we find out, that probing failed? No notifier is called in this 
case. We could use a time-out, but that's ugly. I think, we could ever 
request a new notifier for this case. We could also require client 

Re: [RFC/PATCH 02/13] media: s5p-csis: Add device tree support

2012-07-31 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
On 07/31/2012 01:05 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
 What about CSI receivers that can reroute the lanes internally ? We
 would
 need to specify lane indices for each lane then, maybe with something
 like

 clock-lane =0;
 data-lanes =2 3 1;

 Sounds good to me. And the clock-lane could be made optional, as not all
 devices would need it.

 However, as far as I can see, there is currently no generic API for
 handling this kind of data structure. E.g. number of cells for the
 interrupts property is specified with an additional
 #interrupt-cells property.

 It would have been much easier to handle something like:

 data-lanes = 2, 3, 1;

 i.e. an array of the lane indexes.

 I'm fine with that.

 ...on a second thought: shouldn't this be handled by pinctrl? Or is it
 some CSI-2 module internal lane switching, not the global SoC pin function
 configuration?
 
 On the hardware I came across, it's handled by the CSI2 receiver, not the SoC 
 pinmux feature.

Same here. Is there any hardware known to mux those MIPI-CSI
D-PHY high speed differential signals with general purpose IO pins ?

Or are there mostly dedicated pins used ?

However, if there are cases the lane configuration is done solely at CSI2
receiver level, there seems little point in involving the pinctrl API.

--

Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC/PATCH 09/13] media: s5k6aa: Add support for device tree based instantiation

2012-07-31 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
On 07/31/2012 02:26 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
 But should we allow host probe() to succeed if the sensor isn't present ?

 I think we should, yes. The host hardware is there and functional -
 whether or not all or some of the clients are failing. Theoretically
 clients can also be hot-plugged. Whether and how many video device nodes
 we create, that's a different question.

 I think I can agree with you on this (although I could change my mind if 
 this 
 architecture turns out to result in unsolvable technical issues). That will 
 involve a lot of work though.
 
 There's however at least one more gotcha that occurs to me with this 
 approach: if clients fail to probe, how do we find out about that and turn 
 clocks back off? One improvement to turning clocks on immediately in 

Hmm, wouldn't it be the client that turns a clock on/off when needed ?
I'd like to preserve this functionality, so client drivers can have
full control on the power up/down sequences. While we are trying to
improve the current situation...

 host's probe() is to only do it in a BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER notifier. But 
 how do we find out, that probing failed? No notifier is called in this 
 case. We could use a time-out, but that's ugly. I think, we could ever 
 request a new notifier for this case. We could also require client drivers 
 to call a V4L2 function in this case, but that's not very pretty either.

--

Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] include/video: Add Exynos5 specific FIMD register offsets

2012-07-31 Thread Sergei Shtylyov

Hello.

On 31-07-2012 16:23, Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:


Exynos5 has VIDTCON and VIDCON registers at different offsets
from the previous SOCs. Hence, adding the macros.



Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
---
  include/video/samsung_fimd.h |7 +++
  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)



diff --git a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
index e979f42..820f190 100644
--- a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
+++ b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
@@ -524,3 +524,10 @@
   * 1110   -none-   -none-   -none-   -none--none-
   *    -none-   -none-   -none-   -none--none-
  */
+
+/*EXYNOS5 FIMD REG OFFSET */
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON0   (0x20010)
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON1   (0x20014)
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON2   (0x20018)
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON3   (0x2001C)
+#define EXYNOS5_VIDCON1(0x20004)


   Parens not needed around simple literals.

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC/PATCH 09/13] media: s5k6aa: Add support for device tree based instantiation

2012-07-31 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:

 On 07/31/2012 02:26 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
  But should we allow host probe() to succeed if the sensor isn't present ?
 
  I think we should, yes. The host hardware is there and functional -
  whether or not all or some of the clients are failing. Theoretically
  clients can also be hot-plugged. Whether and how many video device nodes
  we create, that's a different question.
 
  I think I can agree with you on this (although I could change my mind if 
  this 
  architecture turns out to result in unsolvable technical issues). That 
  will 
  involve a lot of work though.
  
  There's however at least one more gotcha that occurs to me with this 
  approach: if clients fail to probe, how do we find out about that and turn 
  clocks back off? One improvement to turning clocks on immediately in 
 
 Hmm, wouldn't it be the client that turns a clock on/off when needed ?
 I'd like to preserve this functionality, so client drivers can have
 full control on the power up/down sequences. While we are trying to
 improve the current situation...

Eventually, when the clock API is available - yes, the client would just 
call clk_enable() / clk_disable(). But for now isn't it host's job to do 
that? Or you want to add new API for that?

Thanks
Guennadi

  host's probe() is to only do it in a BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER notifier. But 
  how do we find out, that probing failed? No notifier is called in this 
  case. We could use a time-out, but that's ugly. I think, we could ever 
  request a new notifier for this case. We could also require client drivers 
  to call a V4L2 function in this case, but that's not very pretty either.

---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] include/video: Add Exynos5 specific FIMD register offsets

2012-07-31 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
Hi,

On 07/31/2012 02:51 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
 +/*EXYNOS5 FIMD REG OFFSET */

How about changing it to, e.g.

/* EXYNOS5 specific register offset definitions */

(but just in case you happen to resend this patch series)

 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON0(0x20010)
 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON1(0x20014)
 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON2(0x20018)
 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON3(0x2001C)
 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDCON1(0x20004)
 
Parens not needed around simple literals.

Yes, I agree it looks insane. But, I think we could allow
this for consistency with the remaining definitions.

-- 

Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC/PATCH 09/13] media: s5k6aa: Add support for device tree based instantiation

2012-07-31 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
On 07/31/2012 02:59 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
 On Tue, 31 Jul 2012, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
 On 07/31/2012 02:26 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
 But should we allow host probe() to succeed if the sensor isn't present ?

 I think we should, yes. The host hardware is there and functional -
 whether or not all or some of the clients are failing. Theoretically
 clients can also be hot-plugged. Whether and how many video device nodes
 we create, that's a different question.

 I think I can agree with you on this (although I could change my mind if 
 this 
 architecture turns out to result in unsolvable technical issues). That 
 will 
 involve a lot of work though.

 There's however at least one more gotcha that occurs to me with this 
 approach: if clients fail to probe, how do we find out about that and turn 
 clocks back off? One improvement to turning clocks on immediately in 

 Hmm, wouldn't it be the client that turns a clock on/off when needed ?
 I'd like to preserve this functionality, so client drivers can have
 full control on the power up/down sequences. While we are trying to
 improve the current situation...
 
 Eventually, when the clock API is available - yes, the client would just 
 call clk_enable() / clk_disable(). But for now isn't it host's job to do 
 that? Or you want to add new API for that?

Indeed, looking at existing drivers, the clocks' handling is now mostly
done in the host drivers. Only the omap3isp appears to do the right thing,
i.e. delegating control over the clock to client drivers, but it does it
with platform_data callbacks.

We've already discussed adding a new API for that,
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg35359.html

However using common clock API and binding a clock to client device
(either DT based or not) sounds like a best approach to me.

Waiting for the common clock API to be generally available maybe we
could add some clock ops at the v4l2_device ? Just a humble suggestion,
I'm not sure whether it is really good and needed or not.

--

Thanks,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH V2 2/5] include/video: Add Exynos5 specific FIMD register offsets

2012-07-31 Thread Kukjin Kim
Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
 
 Exynos5 has VIDTCON and VIDCON registers at different offsets
 from the previous SOCs. Hence, adding the macros.
 
 Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
 ---
  include/video/samsung_fimd.h |7 +++
  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
 index e979f42..820f190 100644
 --- a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
 +++ b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
 @@ -524,3 +524,10 @@
   * 1110  -none-   -none-   -none-   -none--none-
   *   -none-   -none-   -none-   -none--none-
  */
 +
 +/*EXYNOS5 FIMD REG OFFSET */
 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON0 (0x20010)
 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON1 (0x20014)
 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON2 (0x20018)
 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDTCON3 (0x2001C)
 +#define EXYNOS5_VIDCON1  (0x20004)
 --
 1.7.0.4

All of EXYNOS5 SoCs including upcoming SoCs _really_ have same address like
above?

I don't think so. You need to consider its flexibility or some compatibility
when definitions are added.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH V2 3/5] arm: samsung: Include the modified FIMD header file

2012-07-31 Thread Kukjin Kim
Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
 
 The fimd register headers have been moved to include/video/
 hence, modifying the machine files accordingly.
 
 Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
 ---
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimd0.c |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-hmt.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-ncp.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-real6410.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq5.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq7.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/mach-smdk6440.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/mach-smdk6450.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/mach-smdkc100.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c|2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c  |2 +-
  22 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-
 nuri.c
 index f98a83a..573a0c4 100644
 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
 +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
 @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
  #include asm/mach-types.h
 
  #include plat/adc.h
 -#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
 +#include video/samsung_fimd.h
  #include plat/regs-serial.h
  #include plat/cpu.h
  #include plat/devs.h

NO! Don't just replace it. Please put the inclusions with the same kind like
following.

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
index ea785fc..90d8daa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include drm/exynos_drm.h

 #include video/platform_lcd.h
+#include video/samsung_fimd.h
 #include media/m5mols.h
 #include media/s5k6aa.h
 #include media/s5p_fimc.h
@@ -39,7 +40,6 @@
 #include asm/mach-types.h

 #include plat/adc.h
-#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
 #include plat/regs-serial.h
 #include plat/cpu.h
 #include plat/devs.h

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH V2 4/5] driver: Include the modified FIMD header file

2012-07-31 Thread Kukjin Kim
Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
 
 The fimd register headers have been moved to include/video/
 hence, modifying the driver files accordingly.
 
 Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
 ---
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c |2 +-
  drivers/video/s3c-fb.c   |2 +-
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 

[...]

 --- a/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c
 +++ b/drivers/video/s3c-fb.c
 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  #include linux/pm_runtime.h
 
  #include mach/map.h
 -#include plat/regs-fb-v4.h
 +#include video/samsung_fimd.h
  #include plat/fb.h
 
See my previous comments.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH V2 0/5] arm: samsung: Move FIMD headers to include/video/

2012-07-31 Thread Kukjin Kim
Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:
 
 This patchset moves the contents of regs-fb-v4.h and regs-fb.h from arch
 side
 to include/video/samsung_fimd.h
 
 This patchset is created and rebased against master branch of torvalds
 tree.
 Tested on smdk5250 board, build tested for other boards.
 
(Cc'ed Florian Tobias Schandinat)

Yeah, since it's merge window, this series could be created against on
mainline. And IMO, would be helpful to us if this series could be sent to
upstream via samsung tree after reviewing, because this touches too many
files in samsung tree and just adds include/video/samsung_fimd.h. But I'm
not sure the added inclusion will be used in other file of drivers/video. If
so, I can provide some topic branch can be merged into Florian's tree.
Florian, how about?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

 Changes from version 1:
   - Split the patches as per Sylwester comments
   - Changed FIMD_V8_xxx macro to EXYNOS5_xxx
 
 Leela Krishna Amudala (5):
   include/video: Add samsung FIMD register header
   include/video: Add Exynos5 specific FIMD register offsets
   arm: samsung: Include the modified FIMD header file
   driver: Include the modified FIMD header file
   arm: samsung: delete frame buffer header files from platform
 
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdk4x12.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-smdkv310.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-universal_c210.c |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-fimd0.c |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/mach-smdk2416.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-anw6410.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-crag6410.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-hmt.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-mini6410.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-ncp.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-real6410.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq5.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smartq7.c   |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-smdk6410.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/mach-smdk6440.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5p64x0/mach-smdk6450.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5pc100/mach-smdkc100.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-aquila.c|2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c  |2 +-
  arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h|  159

 
  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fimd.c   |2 +-
  drivers/video/s3c-fb.c |2 +-
  .../plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h |  152
 +--
  26 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 194 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
  rename arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h =
 include/video/samsung_fimd.h (74%)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/8 v2] ARM: EXYNOS5: Add machine data for USB 2.0

2012-07-31 Thread Joonyoung Shim

On 07/29/2012 10:11 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Saturday 28 July 2012, Vivek Gautam wrote:

Can you pleae explain why this is done in the changelog?

We try hard to do such mappings from the device driver instead,
so I'm surprised that this is necessary fo rthe USB phy.


We are doing the mapping for device address in the driver, but this memory
mapping for USB PHY registers that need to be programmed by the software
is done here. This is similar to what we see for exynos4 also. Is it
something
that i can still change? Please suggest.


Yes, I think the USB PHY handling for all exynos chips should be changed
from an ad-hoc method to a more formal device driver. As I commented
in another patch of this series, I think the main problem is that
treat the USB PHY as a property of the platform, which it really isn't.

We have a bunch of other USB PHY drivers for other platforms that are
inside of the drivers/usb hierarchy. For all I know, there is no formal
USB PHY driver API yet, and it seems that it would be a good idea to
introduce one now, but for now, just move the code to
drivers/usb/phy/ and make it one file per different kind of PHY.



Totally agree. I think that two PHY drivers need for usb2.0 PHY and
usb3.0 PHY in drivers/usb/phy directory. First, let's make usb2.0 PHY
driver for samsung SoCs from phy control codes of arch/arm, then add to
support usb2.0 PHY for exynos5 and make usb3.0 PHY driver for exynos.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Add I2S SFR base addresses

2012-07-31 Thread Kukjin Kim
PADMAVATHI VENNA wrote:

Padma, don't post with html styled :(

And you need to check the regarding addresses as per Sachin commented.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--- Original Message ---
Sender : Sachin Kamatsachin.ka...@linaro.org
Date : Jul 26, 2012 13:41 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Add I2S SFR base addresses
 
On 25 July 2012 17:35, Padmavathi Venna wrote:
 The base address of I2S 0 controller is similar in exynos4 and exynos5
 platforms. So this patch defines a common macro for the I2S controller
 0 base address in both the platforms and use the same macro.

 This patch also defines the I2S controller 1,2 base addresses in exynos5
 and correct the I2S controller 1 base address in exynos4

 Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna 
 ---
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-audio.c|2 +-
  arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h |6 --
  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-audio.c
b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-audio.c
 index b33a5b6..5dbc9a2 100644
 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-audio.c
 +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/dev-audio.c
 @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static struct s3c_audio_pdata i2sv5_pdata = {
  };

  static struct resource exynos4_i2s0_resource[] = {
 -   [0] = DEFINE_RES_MEM(EXYNOS4_PA_I2S0, SZ_256),
 +   [0] = DEFINE_RES_MEM(EXYNOS_PA_I2S0, SZ_256),
 [1] = DEFINE_RES_DMA(DMACH_I2S0_TX),
 [2] = DEFINE_RES_DMA(DMACH_I2S0_RX),
 [3] = DEFINE_RES_DMA(DMACH_I2S0S_TX),
 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
 index c72b675..5cf7d91 100644
 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
 +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h
 @@ -39,9 +39,11 @@

  #define EXYNOS4_PA_G2D 0x1280

 -#define EXYNOS4_PA_I2S00x0383
 -#define EXYNOS4_PA_I2S10xE310
 +#define EXYNOS_PA_I2S0 0x0383
 +#define EXYNOS4_PA_I2S10xE210
  #define EXYNOS4_PA_I2S20xE2A0

As per the TRM, these addresses (I2S1 and I2S2) are 0x1396 and
0x1397 respectively on Exynos4412 SoC.
Please verify.
I didn't verify Exynos4412 before. I will send a new patch for this.


 +#define EXYNOS5_PA_I2S10x12D6
 +#define EXYNOS5_PA_I2S20x12D7

  #define EXYNOS4_PA_PCM00x0384
  #define EXYNOS4_PA_PCM10x1398
 --
 1.7.4.4

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
linux-samsung-soc in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH] ASoC: Samsung: Update Kconfig for Exynos5250 and Exynos4412

2012-07-31 Thread Kukjin Kim
Padmavathi Venna wrote:
 
 Update Kconfig file to support the Exynos5250 and Exynos4412
 
 Signed-off-by: Sangsu Park sangsu4u.p...@samsung.com
 Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim sbki...@samsung.com
 Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna padm...@samsung.com
 ---
  sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig |8 
  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
 index fe3995c..d54e400 100644
 --- a/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
 +++ b/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  config SND_SOC_SAMSUNG
   tristate ASoC support for Samsung
 - depends on ARCH_S3C24XX || ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PC100 ||
 ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_S5P64X0 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
 + depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG
   select S3C64XX_DMA if ARCH_S3C64XX
   select S3C2410_DMA if ARCH_S3C24XX
   help
 @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ config SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM8580
 
  config SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM8994
   tristate SoC I2S Audio support for WM8994 on SMDK
 - depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG  (MACH_SMDKV310 || MACH_SMDKC210 ||
 MACH_SMDK4212)
 + depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG  (MACH_SMDKV310 || MACH_SMDKC210 ||
 MACH_SMDK4212 || MACH_SMDK4412 || SOC_EXYNOS5250)

Well, do you think _really_ all board which has a EXYNOS5250 SoC is needed
this config?

I don't think so?

[...]

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] arm: samsung: delete frame buffer header files from platform

2012-07-31 Thread Leela Krishna Amudala
Hello Kgene,

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
 Leela Krishna Amudala wrote:

 The FIMD register headers are moved to include/video/
 hence, deleting these files from platform side

 Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala l.kris...@samsung.com
 ---
  arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h |  159 -
  arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h|  403
 ---
 
  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 562 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h

 No. This should be squashed into first patch on this series. See below.

  arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h|  159
 
  .../plat/regs-fb.h = include/video/samsung_fimd.h |  145
 --
  2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 170 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb-v4.h
  rename arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/regs-fb.h =
 include/video/samsung_fimd.h (74%)


If I squash it with the first patch and if somebody set that as a head
commit, it will break the build. Hence, splitted it up from the first
patch.

Thank you Sylwester for suggesting this split up change.

Regards,
Leela Krishna

 Thanks.

 Best regards,
 Kgene.
 --
 Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com, Senior Engineer,
 SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

 --
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fbdev in
 the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
 More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html